Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I13957
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Mongolia in the Copper Age era

I13957
2857 BCE - 2501 BCE
Male
Chalcolithic Afanasievo Culture 2, Mongolia
Mongolia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I13957

Date Range

2857 BCE - 2501 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

G2a-a

Y-DNA Haplogroup

C2a1a1-Z18161

Cultural Period

Chalcolithic Afanasievo Culture 2, Mongolia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Mongolia
Locality Bayan-Ulgii aimag. Ulaankhus sum. Kurgak govi barrow 1. infant burial in main grave
Coordinates 49.3360, 88.7120
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I13957 2857 BCE - 2501 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Chalcolithic Afanasievo culture, emerging around the 4th millennium BCE, represents a significant phase in the prehistory of the Eurasian Steppe, extending into what is now Mongolia. This culture is notable for its role as an early marker of Indo-European expansion into the region and is characterized by its unique integration of technologies and socio-cultural practices, as well as its interactions with its environment and neighboring communities.

Origins and Chronology

The Afanasievo culture is one of the earliest known cultures identifiable as Indo-European on the Eurasian Steppe. It is believed to have originated from the areas further west, possibly contiguous with the broader Yamnaya cultural horizon. Around the middle of the 4th millennium BCE, the Afanasievo people began to migrate eastward, reaching the Altai Mountains and further extending into what is present-day Mongolia.

Geography and Environment

The Afanasievo culture thrived in a diverse and expansive geographical zone that included steppes, semi-arid highlands, and the forested regions of the Altai and Sayan Mountains. This environment provided ample resources for pastoralism and limited agriculture, which were the mainstays of the Afanasievo economy. The climate was generally colder and more humid than today, supporting a rich biodiversity that the Afanasievo people exploited.

Subsistence and Economy

The economy of the Afanasievo culture was primarily based on a mixed system of pastoralism and agriculture. The herding of sheep, goats, cattle, and horses was central to their lifestyle. The domestication and use of horses is particularly noteworthy, as it highlights an important aspect of mobility and cultural transmission across the steppe regions. In addition to pastoralism, they practiced limited farming, focusing on hardy grains and other crops suitable for their environment.

Technology and Material Culture

A hallmark of the Chalcolithic period is the use of copper, and the Afanasievo were adept metalworkers, producing tools and ornaments. Their pottery was typically round-bottomed and undecorated, reflecting functional design more than aesthetic. The adoption and use of wheeled vehicles, possibly chariots, also mark a significant technological advancement during this period.

Social and Cultural Aspects

Afanasievo society was likely organized into tribal groups, with a social hierarchy inferred from burial practices. The kurgan burials (burial mounds) are especially telling, with richer grave goods indicating higher status individuals. These burials often included a variety of grave goods such as pottery, metal objects, and animal remains, showcasing a belief in an afterlife and reflecting the socio-economic structure.

The resemblance of Afanasievo artistic motifs and burial practices to those found in Indo-European contexts supports the theory of an Indo-European lineage. This cultural transmission included linguistic influences, as posited by some researchers linking the Afanasievo to the prehistoric spread of Indo-European languages.

Interaction with Neighbors

The Afanasievo culture was not isolated but interacted with various neighboring cultures across the Eurasian Steppe. Trade networks facilitated the exchange of goods and ideas, evident from the diffusion of bronze technology and other cultural elements. These interactions could have been both peaceful and contentious, as the region saw fluctuating periods of cooperation and conflict.

Legacy and Conclusion

The Afanasievo culture is significant for its role in the early spread of Indo-European peoples and culture across vast areas of the steppe. It laid a foundational layer for subsequent steppe cultures, such as the later Andronovo and Sintashta cultures, contributing to a long-standing tradition of pastoralist nomadism that would shape the history of the Eurasian Steppe.

In conclusion, the Chalcolithic Afanasievo culture represents a pivotal chapter in the history of prehistoric Eurasia, marked by technological innovation, far-reaching migrations, and the birth of a cultural legacy that would influence the region for millennia.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26