Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I3617
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Taiwan in the Iron Age era

I3617
246 CE - 365 CE
Female
Iron Age Taiwan
Taiwan
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I3617

Date Range

246 CE - 365 CE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

F4b1

Cultural Period

Iron Age Taiwan

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Taiwan
Locality Hanben. Blihun site
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I3617 246 CE - 365 CE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Iron Age in Taiwan, particularly among the Austronesian-speaking peoples, marks a significant period in the island’s prehistoric and cultural development. This era is characterized by the widespread use of iron tools and weapons, which began to appear around 500 CE and lasted until the arrival of European explorers and colonists in the 17th century. The Iron Age in Taiwan is notable for its technological, cultural, and social advancements, shaped by both indigenous developments and increased external interactions.

Technological Advancements

  1. Ironworking: The introduction of iron technology was a major turning point. Iron tools replaced earlier stone and bronze tools, increasing agricultural productivity and influencing other areas such as woodworking and construction. The adoption of iron tools allowed for more efficient land clearing and farming, which likely contributed to population growth and settlement expansion.

  2. Pottery and Textiles: Pottery from this period shows more advanced forms and decorations, reflecting increased artistic expression and technical skill. Textiles also became more sophisticated with the likely introduction of new weaving techniques and materials.

  3. Maritime Technology: The Austronesian peoples are renowned for their seafaring skills. During the Iron Age, advancements in boat-building and navigation techniques facilitated trade and cultural exchanges with nearby regions, including the Philippines, Southeast Asia, and beyond.

Cultural Developments

  1. Trade and Interaction: Taiwan's location made it a natural hub for maritime trade. The Iron Age saw an increase in long-distance trade, enhanced by improved seafaring technologies. This period likely saw the exchange of goods such as pottery, jade, and other ornaments, as well as ideas and cultural practices.

  2. Social Structure and Organization: With agricultural advancements and increased trade, social hierarchies likely became more complex. There was probably an emergence of tribal chiefdoms or other forms of leadership, as communities began to organize more formally around resources and trade.

  3. Ritual and Religion: We can infer that religious and spiritual practices also evolved. Artifacts such as pottery and tools often carry symbolic significance, indicating that ritual activities may have played a significant role in community life.

External Influences

Taiwan's Iron Age culture was not isolated but interacted with broader Austronesian migrations and cultural exchanges. The influences from mainland China, as well as maritime interactions with the Philippines, Indonesia, and other parts of Southeast Asia, likely introduced new cultural and technological elements.

  1. Chinese Influence: Contact with mainland China, especially during the Tang and Song dynasties, might have introduced new agricultural practices, metals, and pottery styles. There were likely both direct and indirect contacts and exchanges through trade networks.

  2. Austronesian Connections: Taiwan is considered an ancestral home of the Austronesian peoples, and the Iron Age period would have seen sustained contact with other Austronesian regions. This exchange could foster shared cultural practices and languages, reflecting in similarities in artifacts found across diverse locations.

Archeological Evidence

Archaeological sites from this period, such as the Hanben site, provide insights into the complexity of Iron Age culture in Taiwan. Excavations reveal settlements that demonstrate advanced construction skills with evidence of dwellings, defensive structures, and communal spaces. Burial sites indicate sophisticated funerary practices and social stratification.

Conclusion

The Iron Age in Taiwan represents a period of significant transformation, driven by technological innovations and cultural interactions. This era laid critical foundations for later developments and influenced the cultural identity of Taiwan's indigenous Austronesian-speaking communities. Understanding this period offers valuable insights into the broader Austronesian narrative and the prehistoric connections across Asia and the Pacific.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26