Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I3921
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Vanuatu in the Late Prehistoric era

I3921
610 CE - 770 CE
Male
Vanuatu 1,300 Years Ago
Vanuatu
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I3921

Date Range

610 CE - 770 CE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

P1d1

Y-DNA Haplogroup

M-M5

Cultural Period

Vanuatu 1,300 Years Ago

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Vanuatu
Locality Epi Island. Burumbe
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I3921 610 CE - 770 CE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Vanuatu, an archipelago of over 80 islands in the South Pacific Ocean, has a rich and varied history. Around 1,300 years ago, the culture and society of Vanuatu were primarily influenced by its Melanesian roots, further enriched by the interactions and migrations of various Oceanic peoples. This period marks a phase where Vanuatu was a part of the broader Lapita cultural complex, which had a significant impact on the development of societies in the Pacific Islands.

Social Structure and Organization

  1. Clan and Kinship Systems: The societal structure was organized around clans and extended family units. Kinship was pivotal, influencing social roles, inheritance, and community responsibilities. Leadership roles were often assigned based on lineage and age, with elder members usually holding authority and responsibility in decision-making processes.

  2. Chiefdoms: Some islands and communities might have had emerging chiefdom structures, where a chief or leader enjoyed a higher social status and had the responsibility for overseeing trade, resolving conflicts, and conducting important ceremonial duties.

Economy and Subsistence

  1. Agriculture and Horticulture: The inhabitants engaged in subsistence agriculture, cultivating crops such as yams, taro, sweet potatoes, bananas, and coconuts. Slash-and-burn techniques were possibly prevalent for clearing land for cultivation.

  2. Fishing and Marine Resources: The ocean was a crucial resource. Fishing, gathering shellfish, and utilizing marine resources constituted a significant part of their diet. Canoe-building skills were advanced, enabling efficient fishing and inter-island travel.

  3. Craftsmanship and Trade: The production of pottery, tools, and ornaments was well-practiced. Pottery, with its intricate geometric designs, reflects influences from the Lapita culture and was an artifact of trade and cultural exchange across islands, signaling a complex network of interaction and commerce.

Cultural Practices and Beliefs

  1. Spirituality and Religion: The spiritual world was likely animated by animistic beliefs, with spirits inhabiting natural features such as mountains, rivers, and forests. Ancestor worship was probably significant, with rituals conducted to honor and appease ancestral spirits.

  2. Art and Expression: Artistic expression was evident in tattooing, carvings, and body ornamentation. These art forms served as identifiers of social status, achievements, and spiritual protection.

  3. Language and Oral Tradition: Though written records are absent, oral tradition played a pivotal role in preserving history, culture, and knowledge. Storytelling was an important cultural activity, passing down myths, legends, and genealogies through generations.

Housing and Settlements

  1. Dwelling Constructions: Housing structures were likely constructed from locally available materials such as wood, pandanus leaves, and thatch. Villages were built in areas that provided strategic access to resources, including proximity to the sea or fertile land for agriculture.

  2. Settlement Patterns: Communities were often clustered, with social and economic activities centered around communal spaces. Over time, larger and more complex settlements could have developed, showing signs of increased social stratification or complexity.

Environmental Interaction

  1. Adaptation to Environment: The inhabitants demonstrated adeptness at utilizing the diverse environments of the islands, from coastal areas for fishing to interiors for agriculture. This adaptability was crucial for sustaining communities amid environmental changes.

  2. Resource Management: There is evidence that suggests early Vanuatu populations practiced forms of environmental management, understanding the need for sustainable harvests and use of natural resources to prevent depletion.

Conclusion

The society of Vanuatu around 1,300 years ago was dynamic and intricately linked to the broader Austronesian-speaking world. The culture was rich with traditions that balanced environmental stewardship, social organization, and spiritual beliefs. These elements laid the foundation for Vanuatu’s cultural identity, which would continue to evolve with further migrations, external contacts, and internal innovations. Understanding this period provides a glimpse into the resilience and adaptability of the Melanesian culture in the face of the ever-changing landscapes and seascapes they inhabited.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population Turnover in Remote Oceania Shortly after Initial Settlement

Authors Lipson M, Skoglund P, Spriggs M
Abstract

Ancient DNA from Vanuatu and Tonga dating to about 2,900-2,600 years ago (before present, BP) has revealed that the "First Remote Oceanians" associated with the Lapita archaeological culture were directly descended from the population that, beginning around 5000 BP, spread Austronesian languages from Taiwan to the Philippines, western Melanesia, and eventually Remote Oceania. Thus, ancestors of the First Remote Oceanians must have passed by the Papuan-ancestry populations they encountered in New Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago, and the Solomon Islands with minimal admixture [1]. However, all present-day populations in Near and Remote Oceania harbor >25% Papuan ancestry, implying that additional eastward migration must have occurred. We generated genome-wide data for 14 ancient individuals from Efate and Epi Islands in Vanuatu from 2900-150 BP, as well as 185 present-day individuals from 18 islands. We find that people of almost entirely Papuan ancestry arrived in Vanuatu by around 2300 BP, most likely reflecting migrations a few hundred years earlier at the end of the Lapita period, when there is also evidence of changes in skeletal morphology and cessation of long-distance trade between Near and Remote Oceania [2, 3]. Papuan ancestry was subsequently diluted through admixture but remains at least 80%-90% in most islands. Through a fine-grained analysis of ancestry profiles, we show that the Papuan ancestry in Vanuatu derives from the Bismarck Archipelago rather than the geographically closer Solomon Islands. However, the Papuan ancestry in Polynesia-the most remote Pacific islands-derives from different sources, documenting a third stream of migration from Near to Remote Oceania.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27