Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I4451
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Vanuatu in the Early Prehistoric era

I4451
410 BCE - 210 BCE
Male
Vanuatu 2,300 Years Ago
Vanuatu
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I4451

Date Range

410 BCE - 210 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

M28a7

Y-DNA Haplogroup

S-P315

Cultural Period

Vanuatu 2,300 Years Ago

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Vanuatu
Locality Efate. Mele-Taplins
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I4451 410 BCE - 210 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Vanuatu, an archipelago in the South Pacific, has a rich and intricate history that stretches back thousands of years. Around 2,300 years ago (circa 300 BCE), this region was inhabited by Austronesian-speaking peoples who were part of the broader Lapita cultural complex. This period is crucial in understanding the initial phases of human settlement and cultural development in Vanuatu.

Geographical Context

Vanuatu is a chain of islands located southeast of the Solomon Islands, northeast of New Caledonia, and west of Fiji. The island group consists of over 80 islands, offering diverse ecological zones ranging from coastal areas with sandy beaches to mountainous inland regions. This geographical diversity allowed early settlers to exploit various natural resources, which played a significant role in their sustenance and development.

The Arrival of the Austronesians

The Austronesian settlers were part of the Lapita culture, known for their distinctive pottery, maritime skills, and agricultural practices. These settlers arrived in Vanuatu around 3,000 years ago and brought with them a fully developed package of agriculture, domesticated animals, and advanced seafaring technology. By 2,300 years ago, these communities were well established across the archipelago.

Cultural Characteristics

  1. Lapita Pottery: One of the most significant archaeological hallmarks of this era is the Lapita pottery, characterized by intricate geometric designs often impressed into the clay using dentate-stamped patterns. These designs were not merely decorative but also served as a cultural indicator of shared identity among the Austronesian people across the Pacific.

  2. Agriculture and Subsistence: The inhabitants of Vanuatu practiced horticulture, cultivating crops like yam, taro, and banana. They also domesticated animals such as pigs and chickens, which supplemented their diet. The exploitation of marine resources, including fish and shellfish, was equally vital, given the island location.

  3. Social Organization: Social structures were likely organized around kinship, with clans or extended families forming the primary social units. Leadership likely involved some form of chieftainship or elder council, with status and power potentially being linked to control over resources and knowledge of navigation and agriculture.

  4. Seafaring and Trade: The Austronesians were exceptional navigators with advanced knowledge of astronomy and ocean currents, enabling them to traverse vast distances. This seafaring ability facilitated trade and cultural exchange across the Pacific Ocean, with Vanuatu being an essential node in these networks.

  5. Art and Symbols: Apart from pottery, art in this period could have included personal ornaments made from shells and other materials, reflecting a culture that valued artistic expression and symbolic communication.

  6. Rituals and Beliefs: While the specifics of their belief systems are not definitively known due to limited archaeological evidence, the Austronesians in Vanuatu likely practiced ancestor worship, and rituals could have played a crucial role in social cohesion and cultural identity.

Environmental Adaptation

Adapting to the island environment, the settlers developed strategies for resource management. This adaptability ensured the sustainability of their communities despite challenges posed by natural disasters such as cyclones and volcanic eruptions, which are common in the region.

Conclusion

The era of 2,300 years ago in Vanuatu signifies a period of cultural richness and expansion within the broader Austronesian migration across the Pacific. With their ceramic artistry, agricultural ingenuity, and maritime prowess, these peoples laid the cultural foundations for the future societies of Vanuatu. Understanding this period provides insight into the spread of Austronesian languages and cultures across Oceania, marking a significant chapter in human history.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population Turnover in Remote Oceania Shortly after Initial Settlement

Authors Lipson M, Skoglund P, Spriggs M
Abstract

Ancient DNA from Vanuatu and Tonga dating to about 2,900-2,600 years ago (before present, BP) has revealed that the "First Remote Oceanians" associated with the Lapita archaeological culture were directly descended from the population that, beginning around 5000 BP, spread Austronesian languages from Taiwan to the Philippines, western Melanesia, and eventually Remote Oceania. Thus, ancestors of the First Remote Oceanians must have passed by the Papuan-ancestry populations they encountered in New Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago, and the Solomon Islands with minimal admixture [1]. However, all present-day populations in Near and Remote Oceania harbor >25% Papuan ancestry, implying that additional eastward migration must have occurred. We generated genome-wide data for 14 ancient individuals from Efate and Epi Islands in Vanuatu from 2900-150 BP, as well as 185 present-day individuals from 18 islands. We find that people of almost entirely Papuan ancestry arrived in Vanuatu by around 2300 BP, most likely reflecting migrations a few hundred years earlier at the end of the Lapita period, when there is also evidence of changes in skeletal morphology and cessation of long-distance trade between Near and Remote Oceania [2, 3]. Papuan ancestry was subsequently diluted through admixture but remains at least 80%-90% in most islands. Through a fine-grained analysis of ancestry profiles, we show that the Papuan ancestry in Vanuatu derives from the Bismarck Archipelago rather than the geographically closer Solomon Islands. However, the Papuan ancestry in Polynesia-the most remote Pacific islands-derives from different sources, documenting a third stream of migration from Near to Remote Oceania.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27