Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

H106

mtDNA Haplogroup H106

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig H106

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup H106 is a downstream lineage of H10, itself a member of the broader macro-haplogroup H that dominates much of modern European maternal ancestry. Given its phylogenetic position beneath H10, H106 most likely arose in western or adjacent parts of Eurasia during the Holocene, after the major post‑glacial expansions that shaped the H haplogroup landscape. The estimated time depth placed here (~6 kya) situates H106 in the Late Neolithic to Chalcolithic period, although uncertainty remains because the clade is rare and direct ancient calibrations are limited.

The evolutionary history of H106 should be seen in the context of two broad processes that shaped many H subclades: (1) post‑glacial reexpansion from refugia in southwestern Europe, and (2) demographic movements associated with Neolithic farming and later Bronze Age transformations. As a relatively young and uncommon subclade, H106 likely represents a localized diversification from H10 following these broader population events.

Subclades (if applicable)

Because H106 is an uncommon subclade with limited published sample counts, its internal structure is not as deeply resolved as more frequent H lineages (e.g., H1, H3). Where sublineages have been reported, they tend to show very low diversity consistent with a small number of founder events and restricted regional spread. Continued sequencing of full mitochondrial genomes from modern and ancient individuals will be necessary to resolve internal branching and to detect any geographically structured subclades.

Geographical Distribution

H106 occurs at low frequency in modern population surveys but is detected across several parts of Europe and the Near East. Known occurrences and reasonable inferences from its parent H10 indicate presence (often sporadic) in:

  • Western Europe (Iberia, France, Britain)
  • Southern Europe (Italy, the Balkans, Greece)
  • Scandinavia at low levels
  • Central and Eastern Europe in rare instances
  • The Near East/Anatolia at low frequency
  • Northwest Africa occasionally, reflecting Mediterranean contact

Ancient DNA finds that include H10-related lineages in Mesolithic, Neolithic and later contexts suggest H106 could appear in archaeological assemblages from the Late Neolithic and Bronze Age, but the signal in aDNA is currently sparse.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because H106 is rare, it does not mark any single large-scale prehistoric migration by itself. Instead, its significance is primarily as a marker of localized maternal ancestry that likely participated in broader demographic processes (Neolithic farmer dispersals, later Bronze Age movements). H106's sporadic presence in aDNA from Late Neolithic to Bronze Age contexts suggests it may have been carried by small groups or families that contributed to regional genetic pools without producing a widespread continental signature.

In cultural terms, H106 may appear in contexts associated with West European Neolithic farming communities, Chalcolithic societies, and Bronze Age horizons, but evidence tying it specifically to large archaeological cultures (e.g., Bell Beaker or Corded Ware) is limited and should be treated as provisional until more ancient genomes are characterized.

Conclusion

mtDNA H106 is a low-frequency, regionally distributed subclade of H10 that probably arose in the Holocene within western/adjacent Eurasia. Its rarity means current knowledge relies heavily on inferences from the distribution of H10 and other H subclades; expanding full mitochondrial genome sampling in both modern populations and ancient remains will refine its time depth, internal structure, and precise geographic history. For now, H106 is best interpreted as a minor but informative lineage within the broader European maternal genetic landscape.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis H106. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 H106 Aktuell ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 0 5 0
2 H ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 78 9,404 991
3 HV ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 14 11,092 228
4 R0 ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 2 11,230 4
5 R ~55,000 years ago Paleolithic 55,000 Jahre 17 22,830 57
6 NA - - - 1 22,830 0
7 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 16 26,150 13
8 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
9 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
10 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
11 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
12 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
13 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
14 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (77)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Western Europe / Near East

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where MTDNA haplogroup H106 is found include:

  1. Iberian populations (Spain, Portugal)
  2. Western European populations (France, Britain, Ireland)
  3. Southern Europe (Italy, Greece, the Balkans)
  4. Scandinavian populations (Norway, Sweden, Denmark) at low frequency
  5. Central and Eastern Europe (Germany, Poland, Czechia, Hungary) sporadically
  6. Near Eastern and Anatolian populations (Turkey, Caucasus, Levant) at low levels
  7. Northwest African populations (Morocco, Algeria) occasionally
  8. Present sporadically in island and diaspora Mediterranean communities
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~6k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe H106

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig H106

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu H106. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Bell Beaker Bodrogkeresztur Central Saka Linear Pottery Culture Norse Sopot Culture Swiss Neolithic Viking
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.