Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

M44

mtDNA Haplogroup M44

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig M44

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup M44 is a downstream branch of haplogroup M4, itself a member of macro-haplogroup M, which diversified strongly within South Asia after the initial out-of-Africa dispersals. Based on the phylogenetic position of M44 beneath M4 and the age estimates for M4, M44 most plausibly originated in the late Pleistocene to early Holocene (roughly ~12 kya by reasonable inference), arising within the indigenous maternal pool of the South Asian subcontinent and expanding in localized populations.

The age estimate for M44 is younger than the parent M4 (commonly dated around ~25 kya) because it occupies a derived position on that branch; its emergence likely reflects population structure and local demographic events (founder effects, drift, and small-scale expansions) in South Asia during the terminal Pleistocene and postglacial period.

Subclades (if applicable)

M44 is a narrowly defined lineage with one or more minor downstream sublineages reported in population surveys and sequence-based studies. Where full mitogenomes are available, researchers have identified small internal branches (often labeled in studies as M44a, M44b, etc.), but these subclades are typically rare and geographically restricted. The limited number of confirmed complete mitogenomes means the internal topology of M44 is not yet as well resolved as larger, more common South Asian mtDNA clades.

Geographical Distribution

M44 is concentrated in South Asia, appearing principally in tribal and caste groups across India, with detectable presence in neighboring regions. Observations from population surveys and limited ancient DNA indicate:

  • Moderate presence in the Indian subcontinent, especially in tribal/indigenous communities and some caste groups.
  • Low but consistent frequencies in Himalayan and adjacent populations (Nepal, Tibetan border groups) suggesting some upland dispersal or gene flow across mountain corridors.
  • Sporadic occurrences in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Myanmar, typically at low frequency in modern samples.
  • Very occasional, low-frequency reports from Central and Southeast Asia, likely reflecting historical gene flow or rare long-distance movements rather than primary centers of diversity.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because M44 is a sublineage of a deeply rooted South Asian haplogroup, it is part of the maternal legacy associated with pre-Neolithic and early Holocene populations of the subcontinent. Its persistence in tribal and indigenous groups ties it to long-standing local population continuity. In archaeological terms, M44 may have been present among populations living through the Mesolithic and into the Neolithic and Bronze Age transitions in South Asia; however, direct associations with specific archaeological cultures are limited by sparse ancient mtDNA sampling. The appearance of M4-derived lineages in some Holocene ancient samples supports continuity of local maternal lineages across cultural transitions.

Conclusion

mtDNA haplogroup M44 represents a localized South Asian maternal lineage derived from M4, characterized by low to moderate modern frequencies concentrated in the Indian subcontinent and adjacent highland regions. It is most informative for studies of regional maternal continuity and microevolutionary processes (founder effects, drift, and local expansions) in South Asia. Better resolution of M44's internal phylogeny will come from additional full mitogenome sequencing and wider ancient DNA sampling across South Asia and the Himalaya.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis M44. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 M44 Aktuell ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 0 3 0
2 M ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 42 2,671 41
3 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
4 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
5 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
6 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
7 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
8 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
9 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (41)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

South Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup M44 is found include:

  1. Tribal and indigenous groups across India (e.g., various Dravidian-speaking and Adivasi communities)
  2. Caste and general-population samples from North and South India
  3. Nepali and Himalayan groups (including Tibetan-adjacent populations)
  4. Pakistani populations (Sindhi, Punjabi and other groups at low–moderate frequency)
  5. Sri Lankan populations (both Tamil and Sinhalese groups)
  6. Bengali and eastern South Asian populations (Bangladesh and eastern India)
  7. Myanmar and adjacent Southeast Asian populations (low frequency)
  8. Select Central Asian samples (sporadic, low frequency)
  9. Himalayan highland and plateau-edge populations (sporadic presence)
  10. A small number of archaeological/ancient South Asian samples (Holocene contexts; 2 documented ancient occurrences in available databases)
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~12k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe M44

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  2. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig M44

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu M44. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Andamanese British Neolithic Goyet Cave Gravettian Loebanr Culture Medieval Italian Ostuni Culture Roopkund Culture Spanish Gravettian
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.