Mainland Southeast Asian Worlds: River Valleys, Cities, and Connected Landscapes
Upper Mun Valley · Perfil con revisión de fuentes

Ban Non Wat: settlement, chronology, and households

Reviewed place and institutional names are retained; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented.

The dating study combines stratigraphic order with radiocarbon measurements to investigate transitions among Neolithic, bronze-using and iron-using phases. Higham's later discussion situates the site within continuing arguments about dating, farming and social change rather than treating chronology as a settled regional template.

Prehistoric settlement and chronological research Approximately second millennium BCE–early first millennium CE; modeled phases and modern research distinguished Stratigraphy, radiocarbon models, excavated objects and community-linked research Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand: approximate public-town or distant institutional orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site, cave-entrance, private compound, underwater or vulnerable-deposit location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty, fishing, water-rights or route boundary. The orientation may be far from the archaeological context. No access, collecting, ritual or travel permission is implied.
Resumen

Ríos, trabajo, instituciones religiosas y poder cambiante

Valles fluviales y conexiones regionales

Upper Mun Valley settlements in the Khorat Plateau; dating at one village does not establish a uniform regional sequence. Modern place names provide orientation only and never reconstruct territorial, ethnic, linguistic, religious or sovereignty boundaries.

Organización política y escala comunitaria

Household and status differences are research questions, not evidence of one named kingdom. Ban Non Wat's modeled sequence is not a universal Southeast Asian clock; metalwork does not by itself establish a state, ethnicity or living descent.

Transformación posterior, patrimonio vivo y recepción moderna

Living communities and religious or heritage institutions retain their own authority. This atlas cannot establish identity, religion, ancestry, descent, recognition or membership. Ban Non Wat's modeled sequence is not a universal Southeast Asian clock; metalwork does not by itself establish a state, ethnicity or living descent. Events after 1500 CE are separately identified as later outcomes, research, conservation or reception.

A modeled sequence The dating study combines stratigraphic order with radiocarbon measurements to investigate transitions among Neolithic, bronze-using and iron-using phases.

Brief independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author, institution or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-21 [S1]
Debate remains visible Higham's later discussion situates the site within continuing arguments about dating, farming and social change rather than treating chronology as a settled regional template.

Brief independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author, institution or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-21 [S2]
Living landscape Chang discusses research in a contemporary village and questions archaeological authority over the past; residents are not simply a surviving prehistoric population.

Brief independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author, institution or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-21 [S3]
Secuencia histórica

Una cronología breve y documentada

Estos hitos sirven de orientación y no constituyen una historia completa.

  1. Early settlement phases

    The chronology places early farming settlement before the bronze-using phases; modeled ranges are not exact foundation dates.

  2. Copper-base metal entered the sequence

    The dating model associates metal objects with changing practices, not proof of one replacement population.

  3. Excavation program developed

    Chang describes several excavation seasons directed jointly with Thai Fine Arts Department archaeologists.

  4. Chronology and interpretation debated

    The model and subsequent discussion address both sample quality and the social implications of the sequence.

Cultura e idioma

Hogares, construcción, agua, trabajo, creencias e intercambio

Idiomas mencionados en este perfil

  • No prehistoric spoken language is securely recoverable from the dated layers alone.

Familia lingüística: Language, script, material classification, political allegiance, religion and living identity are distinct; no classification of every resident is inferred.

Research focus: Stratigraphy, radiocarbon models, excavated objects and community-linked research.

Household and status differences are research questions, not evidence of one named kingdom.

Ban Non Wat's modeled sequence is not a universal Southeast Asian clock; metalwork does not by itself establish a state, ethnicity or living descent.

No artifact, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery, restricted knowledge or personal genetic interpretation is reproduced.

DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.

Guía de investigación con IA

Pregunta sobre este perfil revisado

La guía puede explicar y relacionar hechos que ya aparecen en esta página. No puede buscar en la web abierta, establecer identidad ni ciudadanía, ni evaluar ascendencia o información genética.

Basada en el contenido aprobado del perfil Las citas utilizan los identificadores de fuentes de abajo Sin contexto de cuenta ni de ADN

No introduzcas nombres, datos de contacto, información del árbol genealógico, identificadores de cuenta o kit, ni datos genéticos.

Registro de pruebas

Fuentes utilizadas en esta página

Prefer accountable dating studies, excavation projects, regional scholars, national museums and attributed heritage assessments. Historical reports, retrospective court narratives and public institutional interpretations retain their dates and limits. Brief original paraphrases cite sources; no cited author, institution or community endorsed this atlas.

  1. C1

    A new chronological framework for prehistoric Southeast Asia, based on a Bayesian model from Ban Non Wat

    Charles Higham and Thomas Higham; Antiquity 83 · Archaeological study or attributed institutional heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2009

  2. C2

    The Mon-Dvaravati Tradition of Early North-Central Thailand

    Kurt Behrendt; Metropolitan Museum of Art · Archaeological study or attributed institutional heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2007

  3. C3

    The Prehistoric House: A Missing Factor in Southeast Asia

    Charles Higham; New Perspectives in Southeast Asian and Pacific Prehistory, chapter 21; ANU Press · Archaeological study or attributed institutional heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2017

  4. C4

    Vat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · Archaeological study or attributed institutional heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-21

  5. C5

    Temple Zone of Sambor Prei Kuk, Archaeological Site of Ancient Ishanapura

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · Archaeological study or attributed institutional heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-21

  6. C6

    Mrauk-U: A Guide to the Heritage of the Ancient Kingdom

    Robert Leslie Hudson, Daw Khin Than, U Win Kyaing and other contributors; Ministry of Religious Affairs and Culture, Myanmar; author-uploaded copy · Archaeological study or attributed institutional heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2020; author upload 2023

  7. C7

    Central Sector of the Imperial Citadel of Thang Long - Hanoi

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · Archaeological study or attributed institutional heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-21

  8. C8

    Temple of Preah Vihear: inscription decision

    UNESCO World Heritage Committee · Archaeological study or attributed institutional heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2008

  9. S1

    A new chronological framework for prehistoric Southeast Asia, based on a Bayesian model from Ban Non Wat

    Charles Higham and Thomas Higham; Antiquity 83 · Archaeological study or attributed institutional heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2009

  10. S2

    Debating a great site: Ban Non Wat and the wider prehistory of Southeast Asia

    Charles Higham; Antiquity · Archaeological study or attributed institutional heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2015

  11. S3

    Past and present at Ban Non Wat, Thailand

    Nigel Chang; Archaeology Abroad 39, 9–12; James Cook University repository abstract · Archaeological study or attributed institutional heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2008

Las fuentes y los nombres siguen siendo propiedad de sus respectivos editores y comunidades. Se incluyen con fines de cita y educación; su inclusión no implica que avalen a DNAGENICS. Los resúmenes son paráfrasis editoriales originales y deben contrastarse con la fuente enlazada para usos importantes.

Revisión editorial: 21 octubre 2026