West African Worlds: Rivers, Forests, Cities, and Living Heritage
West Africa; selected Ghana context · Perfil con revisión de fuentes

Birimi and Kintampo-associated communities

No ancient self-designation is inferred from this research label or modern place name.

The national inventory includes Birimi among studied archaeological localities. The 2002 study investigates pearl millet within Kintampo subsistence questions. The 2003 dating study separates multiple sedimentary and archaeological components.

Archaeological classification and subsistence context Later third–second millennium BCE contexts; older sediments separately identified Charred plant remains, artifact assemblages and luminescence dating Nalerigu, Ghana: approximate public-town orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site or private-land location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty or route boundary. No access, collecting or travel permission is implied.
Resumo

Famílias, paisagens, instituições e evidências

Rios, ambientes e conexões regionais

Nalerigu is a modern orientation for the named context. No territorial extent or automatic continuity is inferred. Kintampo is a research classification, not proof of one political organization.

Organização política e escala comunitária

Kintampo is a research classification, not proof of one political organization.

Transformação posterior, património vivo e recepção moderna

Living communities and heritage institutions retain their own authority. Later research and interpretation are dated separately below. No Kintampo language or modern ethnic descent can be assigned from pottery or millet. The atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent or membership.

Evidence The national inventory includes Birimi among studied archaeological localities.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of the registered source, not author or community endorsement; retain the stated sample and chronological limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Research context The 2002 study investigates pearl millet within Kintampo subsistence questions.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of the registered source, not author or community endorsement; retain the stated sample and chronological limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Interpretive limit The 2003 dating study separates multiple sedimentary and archaeological components.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of the registered source, not author or community endorsement; retain the stated sample and chronological limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
Sequência histórica

Uma cronologia breve e documentada

Estes marcos servem de orientação e não constituem uma história completa.

  1. Background distinguished

    Middle Stone Age-bearing sediments are not the dates of all later artifacts.

    [S3]

  2. Food production questions

    Millet evidence concerns selected samples and does not establish one origin of farming.

    [S2]

  3. Plant study

    Original research examined millet and subsistence.

    [S2]

  4. Dating study

    Luminescence work investigated a multi-component sequence.

    [S3]
Cultura e língua

Alimentação, artesanato, trabalho, aprendizagem e crenças

Línguas mencionadas neste perfil

  • No Kintampo language or modern ethnic descent can be assigned from pottery or millet.

Família linguística: Language, script, archaeological style and political affiliation are distinct; this selected evidence does not classify every resident.

The national inventory includes Birimi among studied archaeological localities.

The 2002 study investigates pearl millet within Kintampo subsistence questions.

The 2003 dating study separates multiple sedimentary and archaeological components.

Material evidence and transmitted accounts require context; no artifact, manuscript, ancestral-remains or sacred-site imagery is reproduced.

Independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted educational summaries, not reproductions of the cited works or professional scholarly review. Cited communities, museums, researchers, universities, heritage authorities, UNESCO and publishers did not author or endorse this atlas. Names identify sources only; no logos, source imagery, human remains, restricted cultural expressions or sensitive coordinates are reproduced. Public availability does not establish cultural consent. Use the site's contact channel for corrections or concerns.

Guia de pesquisa com IA

Pergunta sobre este perfil revisto

O guia pode explicar e relacionar fatos que já aparecem nesta página. Não pode procurar na web aberta, estabelecer identidade ou cidadania, nem avaliar ascendência ou informação genética.

Baseada no conteúdo aprovado do perfil As citações usam os identificadores de fontes abaixo Sem contexto de conta ou DNA

Interpretação de similaridade genética gerada por IA, sem comprovação de ancestralidade. Conteúdo informativo, sem caráter de orientação profissional.

Ler o aviso completo

Antes de continuar, saiba que a análise será produzida por um modelo de IA. O conteúdo pode ser incompleto, impreciso ou incorreto. Ele descreve similaridade genética estatística com populações de referência e não comprova ancestralidade, etnia, identidade ou descendência. Destina-se apenas a fins informativos e educacionais e não constitui orientação médica, diagnóstica, genealógica, jurídica ou de outra natureza profissional. Não se baseie nele para tomar decisões de saúde, financeiras, jurídicas ou familiares. Na medida permitida pela legislação aplicável, a DNA Genics, S.L. não assume responsabilidade por perdas ou decisões decorrentes do uso desse conteúdo.

Não introduza nomes, dados de contato, informações da árvore genealógica, identificadores de conta ou kit, nem dados genéticos.

Cadastro de Testes

Fontes usadas nesta página

Prefer national heritage institutions, accountable archaeological projects, academic editions, original studies and living community knowledge in its authorized context. Identify institutional summaries, repository abstracts, preliminary reports, older colonial research, advisory evaluations and tentative nominations rather than treating them as independent excavation confirmation. Attribute chronology, composition date, genre, audience and viewpoint. Public access is not permission to reproduce source images, archives or restricted knowledge.

  1. C1

    Human interactions with tropical environments over the last 14,000 years at Iho Eleru, Nigeria

    Cerasoni and colleagues; iScience; PubMed research record · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2023

  2. C2

    Optical and thermoluminescence dating of Middle Stone Age and Kintampo bearing sediments at Birimi, a multi-component archaeological site in Ghana

    Quickert, Godfrey-Smith and Casey; Quaternary Science Reviews · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2003

  3. C3

    10,000 year history of plant use at Bosumpra Cave, Ghana

    Oas, D’Andrea and Watson; University of Ghana repository; Vegetation History and Archaeobotany · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2015

  4. C4

    To Timbuktu From A Land Far Away: Migrating Manuscripts

    Ali Diakité and Paul Naylor; Hill Museum & Manuscript Library · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2025-01-30

  5. C5

    Learning From Our Past

    University of Victoria; community-linked educational publication · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2023

  6. C6

    Banda Through Time

    University of Victoria Libraries; Banda Heritage Initiative · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · Undated; consulted 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    Site archéologique de Bura

    Niger State Party; UNESCO tentative-list record · Tentative nomination, not World Heritage inscription · 2006

  8. C8

    The Oudierin Drainage Archaeological Project: New Perspectives on the Saloum Delta Shell Middens (Senegal)

    Original archaeological project; African Archaeological Review; PMC · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2022

  9. C9

    Early Oyo History Reconsidered

    Babatunde A. Agiri; History in Africa 2, 1–16; Cambridge University Press · Original historical study; oral-tradition and chronology critique · 1975; online edition 2014

  10. C10

    St. George’s Castle (Elmina Castle), Elmina (1482)

    Ghana Museums and Monuments Board · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · Undated; consulted 2026-10-20

  11. C11

    Bibliothèque de Manuscrits al-Imam Essayouti

    Hill Museum & Manuscript Library · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · Undated; consulted 2026-10-20

  12. S1

    Archaeological Sites and other sites of historical-cultural relevance to Ghana

    Ghana Museums and Monuments Board · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · Undated; consulted 2026-10-20

  13. S2

    Pearl Millet and Kintampo Subsistence

    D’Andrea and Casey; African Archaeological Review · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2002

  14. S3

    Optical and thermoluminescence dating of Middle Stone Age and Kintampo bearing sediments at Birimi, a multi-component archaeological site in Ghana

    Quickert, Godfrey-Smith and Casey; Quaternary Science Reviews · Institutional project account or original research; brief attributed summary · 2003

Las fuentes y los nombres siguen siendo propiedad de sus respectivos editores y comunidades. Se incluyen con fines de cita y educación; su inclusión no implica que avalen a DNAGENICS. Los resúmenes son paráfrasis editoriales originales y deben contrastarse con la fuente enlazada para usos importantes.

Revisión editorial: 20 outubro 2026

Relatório de DNA opcional

An optional separate paid genetic-similarity report, not a historical source or a report representing every West African community.

The Historical Atlas is free and uses no DNA or genetic data. The paid report is separate, and this atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, recognition, territory or community membership.
Ver o relatório
Continuar a explorar
West Africa; selected Ghana context Banda: households and connected livelihoods No ancient self-designation is inferred from this research label or modern place name. Ler o Perfil West Africa; selected Ghana context Begho: crafts, households, and exchange No ancient self-designation is inferred from this research label or modern place name. Ler o Perfil West Africa; selected Ghana context Bosumpra and Kwahu plant-work histories No ancient self-designation is inferred from this research label or modern place name. Ler o Perfil