Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I12970
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Mongolia in the Early Iron Age era

I12970
399 BCE - 231 BCE
Male
Early Iron Age Sagly Culture 4, Mongolia
Mongolia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I12970

Date Range

399 BCE - 231 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

A8a

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Q1b1a3a1-L332

Cultural Period

Early Iron Age Sagly Culture 4, Mongolia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Mongolia
Locality Uvs aimag. Ulaangom sum. Chandman Uul. Ulaangom cemetery Grave #48 burial 7
Coordinates 49.9600, 92.0500
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I12970 399 BCE - 231 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Early Iron Age Sagly Culture 4 refers to a specific phase within the broader Sagly Culture, which thrived in Mongolia during the Early Iron Age. This cultural phase is part of the nomadic steppe cultures that existed across the Eurasian steppes, characterized by a unique blend of nomadism, pastoralism, and emerging metallurgical technologies.

Geographic and Temporal Context

Geographic Setting:
The Sagly Culture occupied regions of present-day Mongolia, specifically in areas that are part of the vast Eurasian steppe. This expansive grassland ecosystem stretches from Eastern Europe to Mongolia and has for millennia supported nomadic civilizations due to its suitability for pastoralism.

Temporal Frame:
The Early Iron Age represents the period when iron began to play a significant role in tool and weapon-making, following the Late Bronze Age. For the Sagly Culture, this would be around the first millennium BCE, although precise dating can vary.

Economy and Subsistence

Pastoralism:
Like many steppe cultures, the Sagly people were pastoralists who relied heavily on livestock herding. Horses, sheep, goats, and cattle were central to their economy. The horse, in particular, played a crucial role not just in transportation but also in warfare and hunting, reflecting its cultural significance.

Mobility:
Their pastoral lifestyle necessitated a nomadic or semi-nomadic existence, where movements were dictated by seasonal grazing needs. This mobility influenced social structures, with flexible, kin-based groups that could adapt to environmental changes.

Social Structure

Tribal Organization:
Societies within the Sagly Culture were likely organized into tribes or clans with kinship ties. Leadership might have been more fluid compared to sedentary cultures, likely centered around chieftains or charismatic leaders who could rally support during migrations or conflicts.

Status and Hierarchies:
Evidence from burials indicates a degree of social stratification. Grave goods, such as weapons, jewelry, and horse gear, suggest distinctions in status and wealth, possibly correlated with chieftainship or warrior prowess.

Technology and Craftsmanship

Iron Metallurgy:
The hallmark of the Early Iron Age, metallurgy, signifies technological advancements that the Sagly Culture adopted. Iron tools and weapons supplanted bronze in many utilities, offering advantages in durability and abundance of raw materials.

Craftsmanship:
Artifact finds, including pottery, metalwork, and textiles, indicate a sophisticated level of craftsmanship. Decorative metalwork in iron or bronze and intricate horse harnesses reflect a blend of utility and artistry.

Culture and Belief Systems

Religion and Rituals:
Spiritual life likely involved ancestor worship and reverence for natural elements. The kurgan burial mounds typical in the region signify ritualistic burial practices, where the wealth of accompanying grave goods suggests beliefs in an afterlife.

Art and Symbolism:
Artistic expressions found in the form of petroglyphs and artifact decorations reveal an affinity for animal motifs, reflecting the importance of fauna in daily and spiritual life. These artworks symbolize the deep connection between the Sagly people and their environment.

Interaction and Influence

Trade and Exchange:
Despite their mobility, the Sagly engaged in trade with neighboring cultures, facilitated by their strategic location on the Eurasian steppe, which served as a conduit for cultural and material exchange across the continent.

War and Diplomacy:
Interaction with other cultures sometimes led to conflict, as evidenced by fortifications and weaponry. However, diplomacy and alliances were also essential, as peaceful exchanges were crucial for trade and cultural contact.

Legacy and Evolution

The Sagly Culture, as part of the wider tapestry of Eurasian nomadic peoples, laid the groundwork for subsequent cultures and empires. Their advancements in metallurgy, horsemanship, and mobile pastoralism influenced later societies, such as the Xiongnu and eventually the Mongol Empire. Their way of life contributed to the dynamic cultural and economic exchanges that characterized the Eurasian steppes for centuries.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I12970 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Asians 41.7%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 28.3%
European Hunter-Gatherers 17.6%
Neolithic Farmers 9.0%
Ancient Native Americans 3.4%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 54.6%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 30.7%
Central Asian 19.7%
Pakistan 11.0%
Northern Asian 21.6%
Siberian 18.7%
Mongolian 2.9%
Northern West Asian 2.3%
Caucasian 2.3%
Europe 40.8%
Eastern European 24.6%
Eastern European 24.6%
Northwestern European 16.2%
Finnish 10.7%
Scandinavian 3.0%
Northwestern European 2.0%
English 0.6%
America 4.7%
America 4.7%
Native American 4.7%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in Mongolia in the Early Iron Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Bashkir
3.5282
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I12970 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I12970,0.09526234,-0.08013172,0.06438678,0.04303406,-0.03627166,0.0002794,-0.00480052,-0.00300038,-0.00399336,-0.01854202,0.00420512,-0.00146826,0.00681152,-0.01571942,0.00269552,-0.00124394,-0.00822784,-0.00090362,-0.00185266,-0.0002188,-0.0055282,0.00046088,-0.00383336,0.00755048,0.00179217
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27