Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I13180
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Mongolia in the Early Bronze Age era

I13180
3012 BCE - 2875 BCE
Female
Early Bronze Age Ulgii 1, Mongolia
Mongolia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I13180

Date Range

3012 BCE - 2875 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

A-a1

Cultural Period

Early Bronze Age Ulgii 1, Mongolia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Mongolia
Locality Bayan-Ulgii aimag. Ulaankhus sum. Kumdii govi barrow. burial 2
Coordinates 49.3000, 88.8300
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I13180 3012 BCE - 2875 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Early Bronze Age Ulgii 1 culture, located in the region of modern-day Mongolia and the Eurasian Steppe, represents a fascinating era characterized by significant developments in social structure, economy, and technology. This cultural phase lies within a broader continuum of Bronze Age developments across Central Asia, reflecting unique adaptations to the challenging environments of the steppe.

Geographical and Environmental Context

Ulgii 1 culture emerged in the landscapes of northern Mongolia, a region defined by its rugged terrain, vast grasslands, and harsh climatic conditions. The area is bordered by the Altai Mountains and includes a network of rivers and seasonal lakes. These natural features provided both opportunities and challenges, influencing the lifestyle and survival strategies of its inhabitants.

Economy and Subsistence

The people of Ulgii 1 were predominantly pastoralists, relying heavily on animal husbandry as their primary economic activity. The domestication of horses, cattle, sheep, and goats was central to their way of life, providing food, clothing, and materials for trade and tool-making. This era marks a significant period in the history of horse domestication, which would later play a crucial role in the mobility and expansion of nomadic groups across the steppe.

In addition to pastoralism, the Ulgii 1 culture engaged in limited agriculture. They cultivated hardy crops that could withstand the short growing seasons, supplementing their diet and supporting sedentary or semi-sedentary settlements. Seasonal hunting and gathering also contributed to their sustenance, with evidence of hunting tools and remains of wild animals found in archaeological sites.

Social Organization

The social structure of the Ulgii 1 culture likely consisted of small, kin-based groups or tribal communities. These groups were often led by chieftains or elders who held authority based on their skills, knowledge, and the capacity to provide for their communities. Social status may have been reflected in burial practices, with more elaborate graves reserved for higher-status individuals, as evidenced by the presence of grave goods.

Material Culture and Technology

The Ulgii 1 culture saw the advancement of metalworking, particularly bronze, used to produce tools, weapons, and ornaments. The craftsmanship of bronze artifacts, such as axes, knives, and spearheads, indicates a sophisticated knowledge of metallurgy and suggests the existence of trade networks with neighboring cultures to acquire necessary raw materials. Pottery from this period is also notable, featuring simple forms and designs that served practical purposes.

Art and Symbolism

Artistic expression in Ulgii 1 culture can be seen in petroglyphs, stone carvings, and decorative items. These works often depict animals, hunting scenes, and possibly spiritual or symbolic motifs. The art suggests a deep connection to the natural world and may have played a role in rituals or as markers of territorial boundaries.

Burial Practices and Beliefs

The Ulgii 1 culture demonstrated distinct burial practices that provide insights into their beliefs and social hierarchy. Burial sites often contain circular stone arrangements or cairns, with the deceased laid to rest accompanied by grave goods such as pottery, tools, and ornaments. The orientation and placement of the dead and the artifacts suggest beliefs in an afterlife or the significance of ensuring the dead were equipped for their journey beyond.

Interaction and Influence

The location of the Ulgii 1 culture in the Eurasian Steppe facilitated both interaction and exchange with neighboring cultures. Trade likely played a role in the dissemination of technological innovations and cultural practices. This exchange with other Bronze Age societies in the region contributed to the dynamic cultural landscape of Central Asia during this period.

Legacy

The Early Bronze Age Ulgii 1 culture represents a critical phase in the development of steppe societies, contributing to the cultural and technological foundations that would influence later nomadic civilizations. Their advancements in metallurgy, pastoralism, and social organization paved the way for the complex interactions and expansions characteristic of the later Steppe cultures.

In summary, the Ulgii 1 culture of Early Bronze Age Mongolia exemplifies the adaptability and innovation of steppe societies, highlighting their ability to thrive in challenging environments through the development of sophisticated social, economic, and technological systems.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I13180 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Asians 76.6%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 14.6%
Ancient Native Americans 4.4%
Neolithic Farmers 4.4%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 93.5%
Northern Asian 42.8%
Siberian 27.8%
Mongolian 14.9%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 33.1%
Central Asian 32.8%
Japanese & Korean 9.4%
Japanese 9.4%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 8.3%
Tibetan 8.3%
America 6.5%
America 6.5%
Native American 6.5%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Mongolia in the Early Bronze Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Khakass
5.6407
2
Teleut
5.8450
3
Tubalar
6.5119
4
Shor
6.6169
5
Shor Khakassia
6.6279
6
Shor Mountain
6.8101
7
Kazakh Xinjiang
7.5842
8
Kazakh
7.6270
9
Kirghiz
7.8973
10
Khakass Kachins
7.9828
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I13180 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I13180,0.06434968,-0.24168098,0.06730372,0.02666136,-0.04499018,-0.01251196,-0.00905812,-0.00635868,0.00308086,-0.00654294,0.00744678,-0.0079112,0.01079062,-0.02617406,-0.0127009,-0.00818906,-0.00355286,0.00436728,0.0095272,0.00370352,-0.0031706,0.00367222,0.0141694,0.00151206,0.00446055
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27