Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I14774
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Russia in the Middle Neolithic era

I14774
3750 BCE - 3600 BCE
Female
Boisman Culture in Russia's Middle Neolithic
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I14774

Date Range

3750 BCE - 3600 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

C5a

Cultural Period

Boisman Culture in Russia's Middle Neolithic

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Primorsky Krai. Boisman-2
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I14774 3750 BCE - 3600 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Middle Neolithic Boisman Culture, centered in the Russian Far East, represents a significant era in Circum-Arctic prehistory, delineating major advancements in human adaptation, subsistence practices, and cultural developments. The Boisman Culture, thriving roughly between 5500 and 4900 BC, showcases the creative and adaptive strategies employed by prehistoric communities in response to their environmental contexts. This culture is named after the Boisman archaeological site, which provides vital insights into their way of life.

Geographic Context

The Boisman Culture was primarily situated around the Primorye region along the Sea of Japan, characterized by a diverse ecological landscape that included coastal areas, rivers, forests, and mountains. This varied environmental setting offered an abundance of resources, facilitating the development of a semi-sedentary lifestyle for the Boisman people.

Subsistence and Economy

The Boisman Culture is notable for its sophisticated subsistence strategies that involved both maritime and terrestrial resources. Evidence from archaeological sites indicates that these communities engaged in fishing, shellfish gathering, hunting of marine mammals, and small-scale terrestrial hunting. The presence of fishing implements such as harpoons, fishhooks, and net sinkers suggests a strong reliance on aquatic resources.

Agriculture was not a predominant part of their economy; instead, the Boisman people exploited wild plant resources. This reliance on diverse ecological zones underscores an adaptive strategy that buffered them against resource shortages, demonstrating an understanding of seasonal resource availability.

Material Culture and Technology

The material culture of the Boisman people was rich and varied, reflecting their adaptation to both marine and terrestrial life. Pottery from this era is distinct, with comb-impressed designs and various decorative motifs that illustrate complex social and symbolic aspects of their culture. The ceramics suggest culinary practices linked to fish and game processing.

Lithic technology is also prominent, with the use of microblade and core technologies evident in their toolkits. This equipment allowed for a wide range of activities, from hunting to woodworking. Bone and antler tools further highlight their resourcefulness in utilizing available materials effectively.

Settlement Patterns and Architecture

Boisman communities exhibited a semi-sedentary settlement pattern, with archaeological evidence indicating they established long-term dwellings. Sites often reveal pit-houses or semi-subterranean structures, reflecting an adaptation to the harsh climatic conditions of the region. These dwellings were likely used seasonally, moving with resource availability.

Social Organization and Cultural Practices

While specific social structures of the Boisman people remain largely speculative, the archaeological record provides insights into their social and cultural practices. The burial practices observed, which include both individual and collective interments, often accompanied by grave goods, suggest the presence of social stratification and ritualistic behaviors.

Artistic and Symbolic Expression

The Boisman Culture exhibits a rich tradition of artistic expression, as seen in their pottery and portable art objects. The decorative elements of their ceramics, often featuring geometric and naturalistic motifs, hint at a complex symbolic system. Such intricate designs suggest a developed sense of identity and possibly spiritual or religious beliefs tied to their interpretation of the natural world.

Interaction and Influence

Geographically positioned at a cultural crossroads, the Boisman people were likely influenced by neighboring cultures and vice versa. This is reflected in their technological and artistic developments, which exhibit parallels with nearby cultural groups. Evidence of trade or exchange networks is indicated by the presence of non-local materials and similar stylistic elements across regions, suggesting interaction and cultural exchange.

Conclusion

The Middle Neolithic Boisman Culture represents a formative period in prehistoric Circum-Arctic human adaptation. Their ability to exploit a variety of ecological niches while developing a rich material and symbolic culture underscores the ingenuity and resilience of these ancient communities. As ongoing archaeological research continues to uncover more about the Boisman Culture, it remains a pivotal subject in understanding the broader narrative of human prehistory in the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I14774 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Asians 96.1%
Ancient Native Americans 3.9%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 99.3%
Northern Asian 53.9%
Mongolian 28.7%
Siberian 25.2%
Japanese & Korean 36.4%
Japanese 36.4%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 7.2%
Chinese 7.2%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 1.8%
Central Asian 1.8%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Russia in the Middle Neolithic era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Oroqen
2.8268
2
Nanai
3.4106
3
Ulchi
3.8839
4
Negidal
4.7931
5
Nivkh
5.7371
6
Khamnegan
6.7732
7
Hezhen
7.0369
8
Daur
7.6319
9
Buryat
8.8545
10
Mongol
9.4439
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I14774 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I14774,0.03169726,-0.43130798,0.08142066,-0.0401743,-0.0577089,-0.04110396,0.0198983,0.0243195,0.00908798,0.01580408,-0.00989412,0.00112322,0.00035638,0.00248652,-0.01092342,-0.01135568,-0.0061677,0.00838194,0.0156897,0.00888268,0.01930468,-0.0198643,-0.00088448,0.00197976,0.00958037
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27