Pacific Coast North American Worlds: Coastal Communities, River Networks, and Living Homelands
Washington and Oregon coast–river contexts (orientation only) · Perfil con revisión de fuentes

Meier: lower Columbia household work and storage

Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented.

The project describes a large plankhouse and associated work areas, with only part of the interior excavated. Smith examines how activities and later deposition affected object distributions; a find spot is not an automatic status label.

Plank-house household and production context Approximately 1400–1700 CE focus; continued occupation into the nineteenth century separate Excavated house features, artifact distribution, food remains and site-formation analysis St Helens, Oregon, United States (orientation only): approximate public-town or distant institutional orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site, private compound or vulnerable-deposit location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty, fishing, farming, water-rights or route boundary. The orientation may be far from the archaeological context. No access, collecting or travel permission is implied.
Resumo

Casas costeiras, conexões fluviais e evidências

Conexões costeiras, insulares, estuarinas e fluviais

St Helens, Oregon, United States is a modern orientation, not an ancient capital or boundary. A large household's production and storage differ from a whole town, and rank reconstructions require explicit evidence.

Organização política e escala comunitária

A large household's production and storage differ from a whole town, and rank reconstructions require explicit evidence. Storage capacity and artifact distribution are models, not exact resident totals or the identity of every worker; later occupation is not all precontact.

Transformação posterior, património vivo e recepção moderna

Living communities and heritage institutions retain their own authority; this atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, recognition or membership. Chinookan historical context does not assign one language or status to every person using the household. Later colonial, research, reconstruction and stewardship events are dated separately from the main archaeological context.

Household archive The project describes a large plankhouse and associated work areas, with only part of the interior excavated.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Formation processes Smith examines how activities and later deposition affected object distributions; a find spot is not an automatic status label.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Craft comparison Fuld compares bone and antler technologies at Meier and Cathlapotle rather than treating the settlements as interchangeable.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
Sequência histórica

Uma cronologia breve e documentada

Estes marcos servem de orientação e não constituem uma história completa.

  1. Household sequence begins

    The project places the excavated house sequence around this period; dates are archaeological estimates.

    [S1]

  2. Storage and repeated work

    House features and production materials provide evidence of household activities, not a precise population census.

    [S2]

  3. Continued occupation

    Published ranges extend after European contact; that later evidence must not all be called precontact.

    [S3]

  4. Field excavation

    PSU investigations sampled house, midden and surrounding work areas.

    [S1]

  5. Technological comparison

    Fuld studied artifacts from both river settlements in their respective contexts.

    [S3]
Cultura e língua

Práticas alimentares, artesanato, trabalho doméstico e paisagens cuidados

Línguas mencionadas neste perfil

  • Chinookan historical context does not assign one language or status to every person using the household.

Família linguística: Language, material classification, political allegiance, residence and living identity are distinct; this record does not classify every ancient speaker.

Research focus: Excavated house features, artifact distribution, food remains and site-formation analysis.

A large household's production and storage differ from a whole town, and rank reconstructions require explicit evidence.

Storage capacity and artifact distribution are models, not exact resident totals or the identity of every worker; later occupation is not all precontact.

No artifact, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery or restricted knowledge is reproduced.

DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.

Guia de pesquisa com IA

Pergunta sobre este perfil revisto

O guia pode explicar e relacionar fatos que já aparecem nesta página. Não pode procurar na web aberta, estabelecer identidade ou cidadania, nem avaliar ascendência ou informação genética.

Baseada no conteúdo aprovado do perfil As citações usam os identificadores de fontes abaixo Sem contexto de conta ou DNA

Interpretação de similaridade genética gerada por IA, sem comprovação de ancestralidade. Conteúdo informativo, sem caráter de orientação profissional.

Ler o aviso completo

Antes de continuar, saiba que a análise será produzida por um modelo de IA. O conteúdo pode ser incompleto, impreciso ou incorreto. Ele descreve similaridade genética estatística com populações de referência e não comprova ancestralidade, etnia, identidade ou descendência. Destina-se apenas a fins informativos e educacionais e não constitui orientação médica, diagnóstica, genealógica, jurídica ou de outra natureza profissional. Não se baseie nele para tomar decisões de saúde, financeiras, jurídicas ou familiares. Na medida permitida pela legislação aplicável, a DNA Genics, S.L. não assume responsabilidade por perdas ou decisões decorrentes do uso desse conteúdo.

Não introduza nomes, dados de contato, informações da árvore genealógica, identificadores de conta ou kit, nem dados genéticos.

Cadastro de Testes

Fontes usadas nesta página

Prefer Indigenous governments, museums, heritage organizations, accountable field projects and public heritage institutions. Give source title, author or organization, date and stable link. Brief summaries are DNAGENICS AI-assisted interpretations, not author or community endorsement, reproduction permission or community review.

  1. C1

    About the Makah Cultural and Research Center

    Makah Cultural and Research Center · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  2. C2

    3500 years of shellfish mariculture on the Northwest Coast of North America

    Nicole F. Smith and coauthors; PLOS ONE · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2019-02-27

  3. C3

    Reevaluating the antiquity of the Palmrose site

    Gabriel M. Sanchez; PLOS ONE · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2021-08-17

  4. C4

    Historic Timeline

    Musqueam Teaching Resource; Musqueam and UBC Museum of Anthropology · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  5. C5

    History

    Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  6. C6

    History

    Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    Gwaii Haanas Management Plan 2018

    Parks Canada · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2018

  8. C8

    Collaborative digital curation and recursive publics: The making of Sq’éwlets

    Project team; Museums and the Web · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2018

  9. S1

    Virtual Meier Site: Introduction

    Cameron M. Smith; Portland State University · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  10. S2

    Formation Processes at Meier

    Cameron M. Smith; Portland State University · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2005

  11. S3

    The Technological Role of Bone and Antler Artifacts on the Lower Columbia

    Kristen Ann Fuld; Portland State University · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2010

Las fuentes y los nombres siguen siendo propiedad de sus respectivos editores y comunidades. Se incluyen con fines de cita y educación; su inclusión no implica que avalen a DNAGENICS. Los resúmenes son paráfrasis editoriales originales y deben contrastarse con la fuente enlazada para usos importantes.

Revisión editorial: 20 outubro 2026

Continuar a explorar
Washington and Oregon coast–river contexts (orientation only) Cathlapotle: lower Columbia plank-house communities Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. Ler o Perfil Washington and Oregon coast–river contexts (orientation only) Hoko River: wet-site technologies and seasonal work Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. Ler o Perfil Washington and Oregon coast–river contexts (orientation only) Netarts Bay: settlement, estuary change, and research limits Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. Ler o Perfil