跳转到主内容
mtDNA · 母亲 lineage

U8C

mtDNA Haplogroup U8C

一个家族分支的参考简介 。 共享haplogroups 无法建立家庭关系或文化认同 。

参考简介

部门背景

mtDNA 谱系分支 U8C 的历史背景

Origins and Evolution

Haplogroup U8C is a low-frequency branch of the broader mtDNA macro-haplogroup U8 (which itself sits within haplogroup U). U8 branches split early within the West Eurasian maternal radiation; U8C is generally interpreted as a later, regionally restricted offshoot that likely formed during the Late Upper Paleolithic or the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to early post-glacial interval. Its time depth is modest compared with the oldest U lineages, consistent with a local diversification event within populations that persisted in refugia or small, structured hunter-gatherer groups.

Genetically, U8C retains diagnostic mutations that place it inside the U8 topology but outside the more widespread U8-derived clades (for example the lineage that gives rise to haplogroup K). Because U8 lineages have been repeatedly documented in ancient European and Near Eastern samples, the existence of U8C fits the pattern of Paleolithic and Mesolithic maternal diversity in West Eurasia.

Subclades (if applicable)

At present, U8C is treated as a relatively shallow and rare branch; publicly available phylogenies and population surveys show few deeply branching named subclades under U8C. This reflects both its low modern frequency and limited representation in ancient DNA datasets. Additional whole-mitogenome sampling, especially from undersampled regions and archaeological contexts, may reveal further internal structure or nominate named subclades in the future.

Geographical Distribution

U8C is found at low frequencies in modern populations across parts of Southern and Western Europe and into adjacent Near Eastern and Caucasus regions. The distribution pattern is patchy, consistent with survival in local refugia and subsequent drift and local founder effects. Ancient DNA studies of Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic European remains have documented various U8-lineages; while U8C itself appears infrequently in published ancient datasets, its inferred origin and presence are consistent with a West Eurasian Paleolithic/Mesolithic signature.

Because U8C is rare in large modern surveys, its detection is often limited to targeted mitogenome sequencing or deep regional studies (for example, focused work in the Iberian Peninsula, Italy, the Balkans, and the Caucasus). The patchiness and low frequency also mean that estimates of its precise range and frequency are subject to change with additional sampling.

Historical and Cultural Significance

  • Paleolithic/Mesolithic association: The phylogenetic placement and time depth suggest U8C was present among hunter-gatherer groups in Europe during the Late Upper Paleolithic and/or Mesolithic. It likely contributed to the maternal pool of early post-glacial populations that recolonized parts of Europe after the LGM.
  • Interaction with Neolithic farmers: With the spread of Neolithic farming from the Near East into Europe, many local hunter-gatherer mtDNA lineages—including rare U branches—were diluted by incoming lineages. However, U8C's continued presence at low frequency in some modern populations indicates survival through the Neolithic and later demographic transitions, likely via population continuity in pockets or assimilation into farming communities.
  • Archaeogenetic utility: Because U8C is rare and regionally restricted, when it is found in ancient remains it can provide useful information about local continuity, refugial populations, and minor maternal lineages that did not expand broadly with major culture complexes.

Conclusion

mtDNA haplogroup U8C represents a minor, regionally focused branch of the U8 maternal radiation in West Eurasia. It most likely arose in the Late Pleistocene or early Holocene and is associated with hunter-gatherer substrate populations in Europe and neighboring regions. Its rarity in modern samples and limited presence in ancient datasets make it a candidate for targeted mitogenome studies; increased sampling and ancient DNA recovery will refine its phylogeny, geographic limits, and archaeological associations.

关键点

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
参考简介

树形关系( N)

phylgenetic 上下文和子拼写

进化路径

沿已记录的上级分支追溯至 U8C。年代为估计值,可能随参考数据更新而调整。

步骤 单倍群 年龄估计 考古时代 时间流逝 直系后裔 被测试的现代后裔 古代连接
1 U8C 当前 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 years 0 29 6
2 U8B'C - - - 2 1,834 0
3 U8 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 years 2 1,873 5
4 U2'3'4'7'8'9 - - - 5 3,500 0
5 U ~46,000 years ago Paleolithic 46,000 years 5 5,557 110
6 R ~55,000 years ago Paleolithic 55,000 years 17 22,830 57
7 NA - - - 1 22,830 0
8 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 years 16 26,150 13
9 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 years 7 30,162 6
10 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
11 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
12 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
13 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
14 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
15 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 years 2 32,236 5

Subclades (0)

终端分支 -没有记录的子密钥

Siblings (1)

来自同一父分支的分支( oplogroup)

参考简介

哪里是这个世界

地理分布和现代存在

记录来源

Western Eurasia

现代发行

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup U8C is found include:

  1. Iberian Peninsula (modern and some ancient Iberian hunter-gatherer samples)
  2. Southern Italy and Sicily (low-frequency detections in modern populations)
  3. Balkans (sporadic modern and ancient occurrences)
  4. Caucasus region (patchy presence in some modern samples)
  5. Near East (rare detections in limited surveys)
  6. Central and Western Europe (occasional low-frequency findings in regional studies)
历史背景

分枝穿越时间

大致历史时间范围内的估计形成情况:周期标志提供了背景,并不意味着与特定文化的联系。

  1. ~20k 年前

    上一个冰川最大值

    上一个冰河时代的高峰,人口隔离

  2. ~18k 年前

    Haplogroup U8C

    此 mtDNA 分支的形成时间为推定值,日期和地点仅作参考。

    这个分支
  3. ~10k 年前

    新石器革命

    农业开始,定居社区形成

  4. ~5k 年前

    青铜时代

    金属加工、书写和早期文明

  5. ~3k 年前

    铁器时代

    铁工具,扩大贸易网络

  6. ~2.5k 年前

    古典时代

    希腊和罗马文明蓬勃发展

  7. 现

    现日

    现代时代

参考简介

考古学背景

已记录的 mtDNA 分支 U8C 考古关联

有记录的协会

这些标签描述与 U8C 相关的参考样本所处的考古背景。仅凭这种关联,无法判断所有携带者都属于某种文化或沿同一路线迁徙。

Austria_Avar-2 Buran-Kaya Cioclovina France_Occitanie_Gard_AvendelaBoucle_N Gravettian Italy Hohle Fels Magdalenian Paglicci Culture Pavlovian Culture Solutrean Sunghir Culture
文化任务基于古代DNA样本的考古背景,可能代表特定时期的区域协会.
参考简介

样本目录

单倍群 U8C 的直接携带者 6 名

6 显示 ^ 6 匹配样本

Portraits是AI生成的插图,样本标签和加入ID识别参考记录.

纵向 样本 国家 大纪元 日期 文化 mtDNA 匹配
AI生成的示例性肖像 Apulia Gravettian individual, Paglicci (Apulia, Foggia, Rignano Garganico), Italy (29,104-28,678 BCE)
Sample ID: PA12
Italy Italian Gravettian 29104-28678 calBCE (24600±90 BP, MAMS-19075(S-EVA 28202)) Gravettian Italy U8c Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 Czechia Gravettian individual, Dolni Vestonice, Czech Republic (29,200-28,500 BCE)
Sample ID: Vestonice13
Czech Republic Vestonice 13 Site, Czech Republic 29200-28500 BCE Pavlovian Culture U8c Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 European Upper Paleolithic individual, Sunghir, Russia (32,326-30,080 BCE)
Sample ID: Sunghir1
Russia Sunghir 1 Site, Russia 32326 BCE - 30080 BCE Sunghir Culture U8c Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 Palaeolithic Upper individual, Sunghir, Russia (32,326-30,080 BCE)
Sample ID: Sunghir1
Russia The Upper Paleolithic 32326 BCE - 30080 BCE U8c Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 Paleolithic European individual, Apulia. Paglicci, Italy (33,150-29,250 BCE)
Sample ID: Paglicci133
Italy Paglicci 133 Hunter-Gatherer, Southern Italy 33150 BCE - 29250 BCE Paglicci Culture U8c Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 Italy Hg individual, Apulia. Paglicci, Italy (33,150-29,250 BCE)
Sample ID: Paglicci133
Italy Ancient Hunter-Gatherers of Italy 33150 BCE - 29250 BCE U8c Direct
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

古代世系证据地图

跟随母舰飞向这个分支 探索古代载体的发现地点

正在装入古老的观测...

标记是考古发现地点。一个破碎的连接器是连续分支之间一种不确定的、拟议中的地理过渡,辅以多个日期的观察;它不是一个准确的旅行路线、出生地或直接血统的证明。父系样本可能属于其他后代分支。在证据不足的地方,差距依然存在。样本日期与随机群形成日期不同。

参考简介

载体分布图

6 个古代 DNA 样本的地理分布,涵盖 U8C 及其下游分支的携带者

直接承运人
时间段过滤器
所有时间段
显示全部样本
参考简介

时间分布

载体在考古时期的分布

参考简介

地理分布

按有记录的抽样国家计算,反映的是现有的参考选择,而不是人口频率。

参考简介

国家 × 大纪元发行

比较各国和考古时期记录的样本数量。选择一个人口密集的细胞来检查样本。

数据

数据证明( P)

来源信息和数据质量

上次更新 2026-06-14
信心分数 50/100
覆盖范围 Low

数据来源

分类、估计日期和地理背景反映了所记录的参考数据,随着证据的修订而可能发生变化,样本覆盖范围不均匀;所记录的地点和考古协会没有确定个人出身或文化特征。