Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A man buried in China in the Paleolithic era
Ancient Individual

A man buried in China in the Paleolithic era

A man buried in China during the Epipaleolithic China

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

Qihe3
9798 BCE - 9407 BCE
Male
China
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

Qihe3

Date Range

9798 BCE - 9407 BCE

Cultural Period

Epipaleolithic China

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

R9c1b

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Social Role

Hunter (AI estimate, era-typical)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country China
Locality Fujian. Zhangping. Qihe Cave
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

Qihe3 9798 BCE - 9407 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Region & Environment

Epipaleolithic communities in China occupied a mosaic of environments, including river valleys, coastal margins, and forested uplands. Seasonal differences in temperature, rainfall, and resource availability shaped where people could hunt, fish, and collect plant foods.

Historical Context

This period falls before widespread agriculture and complex state formation in East Asia. It is best understood as part of the broader late Pleistocene–early Holocene sequence in which human groups adapted to changing climates and shifting ecosystems.

Populations & Lifeways

Populations were likely organized in small, mobile groups. Lifeways emphasized foraging and hunting, with repeated seasonal rounds to exploit stable local resources such as wild plants, freshwater fauna, and game animals. Evidence generally points to temporary or short-term occupations rather than permanent villages.

Archaeology & Material Culture

Archaeologically, the Epipaleolithic is commonly identified through regional stone-tool assemblages, often including blade and flake production and microlithic forms. Site types such as open-air localities and rockshelters (where present) preserve discard patterns from tool making, resharpening, and hunting-related tasks. Organic materials are less often preserved, so stone tools provide most of the evidence for technology.

Culture & Society

Across this pre-agricultural world, social structures were probably flexible and tied to mobility, kin networks, and shared knowledge of local resources. Material culture is typically dominated by small toolkits—durable components that could be transported and repaired as needs changed.

Legacy & Transition

The Epipaleolithic record reflects long-term adaptation to post-glacial and early Holocene environmental change. Over time, many regions of China show increasing intensification of food use and eventually transitions toward more sedentary lifeways and farming-associated material culture in later prehistoric phases.

Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
BalongKD06 Balong Jin Period China 250 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Beijing Town. Balong Cave, China View
BalongKD07 Balong Jin Period China 262 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Beijing Town. Balong Cave, China View
BalongKD08 Balong Jin Period China 250 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Beijing Town. Balong Cave, China View
BalongKD10 Balong Jin Period China 382 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Beijing Town. Balong Cave, China View
BandaKD11 Banda Period China 484 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Banda Cave, China View
BandaKD15 Banda Period China 433 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Banda Cave, China View
Baojianshan5_M1 China Guangxi Baojianshan Neolithic 6400 BCE Guangxi. Chongzuo City. Longzhou County. Baojianshan Cave A, China View
Baojianshan5_M2 China Guangxi Baojianshan Neolithic 6400 BCE Guangxi. Chongzuo City. Longzhou County. Baojianshan Cave A, China View
CenxunKP05 Tang Dynasty China 484 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Taiping Town. Cenxun Cave, China View
CenxunKP07 Tang Dynasty China 584 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Taiping Town. Cenxun Cave, China View
CenxunKP13 Tang Dynasty China 440 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Taiping Town. Cenxun Cave, China View
Dushan4_1 Neolithic Guangxi Dushan, China 7025 BCE Guangxi. Dushan, China View
GaofengNL23 Qing Dynasty China 1530 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Gaofeng Cave, China View
HuaqiaoNL26 Ming Dynasty China 1437 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huaqiao Village. Baitai Mountain. Huaqiao Caves, China View
HuatuyanNL02 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1484 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL04 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1400 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL06 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1400 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL11 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1474 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL17 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1442 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL18 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1400 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL19 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1495 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL21 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1456 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
LadaKH01 China Guangxi Lada Northern And Southern Dynasties Sui Tang 484 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Jinchengjiang District. Lada Cave, China View
LayiKD01 Layi Period China 419 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Beijing Town. Baida Village. Layi Cave, China View
Longlin_1 Epipaleolithic Guangxi Longlin, China 9853 BCE Guangxi. Longlin Cave, China View
Qihe3 Epipaleolithic China 9798 BCE Fujian. Zhangping. Qihe Cave, China View
QinchangKD13 Qinchang Period China 431 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Yantan Town. Qinchang Cave, China View
QinchangKD14 Qinchang Period China 406 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Yantan Town. Qinchang Cave, China View
ShenxianKP09 China Guangxi Shenxian Sui Tang 601 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Shenxian Cave, China View
Yinwang China Guangxi Yinwang Ming 1400 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Liming Township. Liming Village. Nian Mountain. Yinwang Cave, China View
YiyangKP17 Northern and Southern Dynasties 484 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Yiyang Cave, China View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
Qihe3 Epipaleolithic China 9798 BCE Fujian. Zhangping. Qihe Cave, China View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

Human population history at the crossroads of East and Southeast Asia since 11,000 years ago

Authors Wang T, Wang W, Xie G, Li Z, Fan X et al.
Abstract

Past human genetic diversity and migration between southern China and Southeast Asia have not been well characterized, in part due to poor preservation of ancient DNA in hot and humid regions. We sequenced 31 ancient genomes from southern China (Guangxi and Fujian), including two ∼12,000- to 10,000-year-old individuals representing the oldest humans sequenced from southern China. We discovered a deeply diverged East Asian ancestry in the Guangxi region that persisted until at least 6,000 years ago. We found that ∼9,000- to 6,000-year-old Guangxi populations were a mixture of local ancestry, southern ancestry previously sampled in Fujian, and deep Asian ancestry related to Southeast Asian Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers, showing broad admixture in the region predating the appearance of farming. Historical Guangxi populations dating to ∼1,500 to 500 years ago are closely related to Tai-Kadai and Hmong-Mien speakers. Our results show heavy interactions among three distinct ancestries at the crossroads of East and Southeast Asia.

Use code for 20% off Expires Jul 22