Skip to main content
mtDNA · Maternal lineage

M10A1A1B

mtDNA Haplogroup M10A1A1B

A reference profile for one lineage branch. Shared haplogroups do not establish a family relationship or cultural identity.

Reference profile

Branch background

Historical context for mtDNA lineage branch M10A1A1B

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup M10A1A1B is a downstream branch of M10A1A1 and therefore sits within the broader East Eurasian M10 lineage. Based on the parent clade's estimated emergence in the mid-to-late Holocene, M10A1A1B most likely diversified on the eastern Eurasian steppe region during the later Bronze Age to early Iron Age interval (a few thousand years before present). Its phylogenetic position as a subclade of M10A1A1 implies a relatively recent origin (within the last ~3–4 kya), consistent with demographic events on the northern Eurasian steppe such as increasing pastoralist mobility and inter-group contacts across Mongolia, southern Siberia and adjacent parts of northern China.

Subclades (if applicable)

As a terminal designation (M10A1A1B), this lineage represents a narrowly defined maternal branch downstream of M10A1A1. Where additional downstream diversity exists, it is expected to be geographically localized and of recent antiquity; however, published and sampled diversity for M10A1A1B appears limited, with few reported variants and low-frequency occurrences in modern and ancient datasets. Continued high-resolution mtDNA sequencing in eastern Eurasia may reveal further substructure.

Geographical Distribution

M10A1A1B shows a concentrated distribution in northern East Asia and Siberia, reflecting the broader distribution of its parent clade. Modern and ancient detections indicate the haplogroup occurs at highest relative frequencies among:

  • Mongolic-speaking groups and populations across Mongolia and adjacent regions of southern Siberia.
  • Turkic-speaking groups of the Altai and nearby Central Asia at low-to-moderate frequencies.
  • Indigenous Siberian populations (for example Yakut/Sakha and some Evenk groups).

Lower-frequency or sporadic occurrences are recorded on the Tibetan Plateau, among northern Han Chinese and ethnic minorities in northern China, on the Korean peninsula and in regional Japanese samples. A small number of archaeological samples from eastern steppe Bronze Age and Iron Age burials carry lineages within M10A1A1, indicating antiquity in steppe contexts.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The pattern of M10A1A1B — concentrated in steppe pastoralist and northern East Asian groups with spill-over into highland and agricultural populations — fits demographic models of maternal lineage movement associated with nomadic mobility, small-scale female-mediated gene flow, and regional admixture between steppe pastoralists and neighboring agricultural populations. Its presence in ancient steppe burials ties it to the mobile lifeways of Bronze Age and later Iron Age eastern steppe horizons; later medieval nomadic polities (Turkic and Mongolic expansions) likely redistributed such maternal lineages across broader parts of northeastern Eurasia and into Central Asia.

Because it is a relatively rare and recent subclade, M10A1A1B is most useful in regional phylogeographic studies that track maternal line continuity and small-scale migrations across the eastern steppe and adjacent highlands rather than as a marker of large continent-spanning events.

Conclusion

M10A1A1B is a localized, recently derived maternal lineage of the eastern Eurasian steppe, principally associated with Mongolic, Turkic and Siberian populations and detected at low frequencies in neighboring East Asian and Tibetan populations. Its distribution and archaeological occurrences point to a role in the demographic dynamics of steppe pastoralist populations from the late Bronze Age/Iron Age onward and to ongoing, low-level maternal gene flow between steppe groups and surrounding agricultural and highland communities. Further sampling and full mitogenome sequencing across under-sampled regions may clarify its internal diversity and finer-scale migration history.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Reference profile

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

Follow the recorded parent branches toward M10A1A1B. Dates are estimates and can change as reference data is revised.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 M10A1A1B Current ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,200 years 0 14 3
2 M10A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,800 years 2 15 0
3 M10A1A ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 years 1 19 2
4 M10A1 ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 years 2 19 0
5 M10A ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 years 2 23 1
6 M10 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 years 1 24 0
7 M ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 years 42 2,671 41
8 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 years 7 30,162 6
9 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
10 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
11 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
12 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
13 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
14 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 years 2 32,236 5

Subclades (0)

Terminal branch - no recorded subclades

Siblings (1)

Other branches from the same parent haplogroup

Reference profile

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Recorded origin

Central–Northeast Asia (Eastern Eurasian steppe)

Modern Distribution

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup M10A1A1B is found include:

  1. Mongolic-speaking groups (Mongolians, Buryats)
  2. Turkic-speaking populations of the Altai and nearby Central Asia (Tuvans, Altaians, some Kazakh/Kyrgyz samples)
  3. Indigenous Siberian peoples (Yakut/Sakha, Evenk and other north Siberian groups)
  4. Tibetan Plateau populations (Tibetans and neighboring highland groups) — low frequency
  5. Northern Han Chinese and ethnic minorities in northern China (low to moderate frequency)
  6. Korean peninsula populations (low frequency)
  7. Japan (sporadic/low frequency in some regional samples)
  8. Central Asian groups (scattered low-frequency occurrences among Kyrgyz, Uzbek/Kazakh samples)
  9. Ancient eastern steppe assemblages (Bronze Age and Iron Age burials associated with nomadic horizons)
  10. Diaspora and admixed East Eurasian communities (scattered occurrences)
Historical context

A branch through time

Estimated formation in a broad historical timeline. Period markers provide context and do not imply a connection with particular cultures.

  1. ~10k years ago

    Neolithic Revolution

    Agriculture begins, settled communities form

  2. ~5k years ago

    Bronze Age

    Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

  3. ~3.2k years ago

    Haplogroup M10A1A1B

    Estimated formation of this mtDNA branch; dates and locations are reference estimates.

    This branch
  4. ~3k years ago

    Iron Age

    Iron tools, expanded trade networks

  5. ~2.5k years ago

    Classical Antiquity

    Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

  6. Present

    Present Day

    Modern era

Reference profile

Archaeological context

Recorded archaeological associations for mtDNA branch M10A1A1B

Recorded associations

These labels describe archaeological contexts recorded for reference samples linked to M10A1A1B. An association does not establish that all carriers belonged to a culture or followed a particular migration route.

China_Tibet_Pulanduowa_IA Early Avar Hunnic Period Indonesian Hunter-Gatherer Culture Medieval Tuv Russia_Udmurtia_Medieval_LateChiyalik-oEurope Scythian Sukhbaatar Bronze Culture Tang Culture Three Kingdoms Period Xiongnu Culture
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
Reference profile

Sample Catalog

3 direct carriers of haplogroup M10A1A1B

3 shown · 3 matching samples

Portraits are AI-generated illustrations. Sample labels and accession IDs identify the reference records.

Portrait Sample Country Era Date Culture mtDNA Match
AI-generated illustrative portrait of Early Avar-o Low East Asia individual, Rákóczifalva-Bagi-földek (Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok Coiunty, Szolnok), Hungary (550-700 CE)
Sample ID: RKF164
Hungary Hungary EarlyAvar 550-700 CE Early Avar M10a1a1b Direct
AI-generated illustrative portrait of Early Avar-o High East Asia individual, Rákóczifalva-Bagi-földek (Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok Coiunty, Szolnok), Hungary (550-700 CE)
Sample ID: RKF185
Hungary Hungary EarlyAvar 550-700 CE Early Avar M10a1a1b Direct
AI-generated illustrative portrait of Early Avar-o Low East Asia individual, Rákóczifalva-Bagi-földek (Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok Coiunty, Szolnok), Hungary (606-646 CE)
Sample ID: RKF148
Hungary Hungary EarlyAvar 600-650 BCE Early Avar M10a1a1b Direct
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Reference profile

Carrier Distribution Map

Geographic distribution of 3 ancient DNA samples (direct and subclade carriers of M10A1A1B)

Direct carrier
Time Period Filter
All Time Periods
Showing all samples
Reference profile

Temporal Distribution

Distribution of carriers across archaeological periods

Reference profile

Geographic Distribution

Counts by recorded sample country. These reflect the available reference selection, not population frequencies.

Reference profile

Country × Era Distribution

Compare recorded sample counts across countries and archaeological periods. Select a populated cell to inspect a sample.

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-02-16
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low

Data Source

Classification, estimated dates and geographic context reflect the recorded reference data and may change as evidence is revised. Sample coverage is uneven; recorded locations and archaeological associations do not establish personal origin or cultural identity.