Skip to main content
Y-DNA · Paternal lineage

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C

A reference profile for one lineage branch. Shared haplogroups do not establish a family relationship or cultural identity.

Reference profile

Branch background

Historical context for Y-DNA lineage branch R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C is a very deep and rare subclade within the broader R1a paternal lineage. Because it sits far downstream in the phylogenetic tree, it likely reflects a localized founder event followed by limited expansion rather than a large-scale early demographic radiation.

The most plausible geographic context for its formation is Eastern Europe or the Eurasian steppe, where many R1a branches diversified during the late Neolithic and Bronze Age. Given the parent clade context and the expected rarity of this terminal branch, it is reasonable to infer a relatively recent age on the order of ~3 kya, though exact estimates would require direct sampling and phylogenetic dating from published datasets.

Subclades

As a terminal or near-terminal branch in the provided classification, R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C appears to represent a highly specific descendant lineage rather than a broad, well-characterized clade with many named downstream branches. In practical population-genetic terms, such a lineage often marks a small paternal cluster within a larger R1a network.

If additional downstream SNPs are discovered, they may reveal further micro-branches associated with particular kin groups, regional isolates, or historically documented founder effects.

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to be patchily distributed rather than broadly common. Its likely presence aligns with regions where R1a has been historically frequent and diverse:

  • Eastern Europe: especially in populations such as Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Russians, Lithuanians, and Latvians.
  • Scandinavia: where R1a lineages are present at lower but meaningful frequencies, especially in Sweden and Norway.
  • Central Asia: including Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and related groups shaped by steppe-era paternal gene flow.
  • South Asia: particularly among some Indo-Aryan-speaking populations, where R1a lineages are widespread due to historical and prehistoric movements.
  • Iranian-speaking and other West Eurasian groups: where secondary dispersals of R1a occurred.
  • Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations: likely through admixture and steppe-mediated contact.

Because this is a rare derived branch, it may appear only sporadically in these regions, often in specific families or localized subpopulations.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Broad R1a ancestry is strongly associated with the Pontic-Caspian steppe horizon and later expansions linked to Corded Ware, Sintashta, and related Bronze Age groups. While this specific lineage is too rare to be tied securely to a single archaeological culture, its ancestry is consistent with the broader demographic processes that spread R1a across Eurasia.

The downstream age of R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C suggests that it may have emerged during the Bronze Age to early historical period, potentially within populations experiencing mobility, elite formation, or clan-level founder effects. Such lineages can persist at low frequency within ethnolinguistic groups for centuries or millennia.

In some cases, rare R1a subclades may also reflect regional continuity within historically documented populations, preserving a paternal signal of migration, isolation, or social structure.

Conclusion

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C is a highly specific and rare paternal lineage nested within the expansive R1a haplogroup. Its distribution is expected to be limited and uneven, but its phylogenetic position points to a Eurasian steppe/Eastern European origin and a history shaped by founder effects, mobility, and the broader spread of R1a-associated populations across Eurasia.

Key Points

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Reference profile

Tree & Relationships

Phylogenetic context and subclades

Evolution Path

Follow the recorded parent branches toward R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C. Dates are estimates and can change as reference data is revised.

Steps Haplogroup Age Estimate Archaeology Era Time Passed Immediate Descendants Tested Modern Descendants Ancient Connections
1 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C Current ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 1 0 0
2 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 2 0 0
3 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 1 0 0
4 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 1 0 0
5 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 2 0 0
6 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 1 0 0
7 R1A1A1B1A2B3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 2 158 3
8 R1A1A1B1A2B3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 1 336 0
9 R1A1A1B1A2B ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 1 359 4
10 R1A1A1B1A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 3 445 0
11 R1A1A1B1A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 years 3 808 5
12 R1A1A1B1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 years 1 852 0
13 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 years 2 1,567 7
14 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 years 2 1,974 0
15 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 years 1 2,016 27
16 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 years 2 2,052 0
17 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 years 2 2,176 37

Siblings (1)

Other branches from the same parent haplogroup

Reference profile

Where in the World

Geographic distribution and modern presence

Recorded origin

Eastern Europe or Eurasian Steppe

Modern Distribution

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Scandinavians, especially Swedes and Norwegians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Central Asian populations
  5. Many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups and other West Eurasian populations
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regional Presence

Eastern Europe Moderate
Central Europe Low
Baltic States Low
Northern Europe (Scandinavia) Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Central Asia Moderate
South Asia Moderate
Western Asia Low
Northern Asia Low
Historical context

A branch through time

Estimated formation in a broad historical timeline. Period markers provide context and do not imply a connection with particular cultures.

  1. ~10k years ago

    Neolithic Revolution

    Agriculture begins, settled communities form

  2. ~5k years ago

    Bronze Age

    Metalworking, writing, and early civilizations

  3. ~3k years ago

    Iron Age

    Iron tools, expanded trade networks

  4. ~3k years ago

    Haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C

    Estimated formation of this Y-DNA branch; dates and locations are reference estimates.

    This branch
  5. ~2.5k years ago

    Classical Antiquity

    Greek and Roman civilizations flourish

  6. Present

    Present Day

    Modern era

Reference profile

Archaeological context

Recorded archaeological associations for Y-DNA branch R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C

Recorded associations

These labels describe archaeological contexts recorded for reference samples linked to R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C. An association does not establish that all carriers belonged to a culture or followed a particular migration route.

Austria_Avar Avar Culture Early Avar Hun Culture Hungary_AbasarBoltteto_Medieval Late Antique Norway_Sund_EBA Russia_Samara_Khazar Viking Viking Denmark
Culture assignments are based on archaeological context of ancient DNA samples and may represent regional associations during specific time periods.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Data

Data & Provenance

Source information and data quality

Last Updated 2026-06-17
Confidence Score 50/100
Coverage Low

Data Source

Classification, estimated dates and geographic context reflect the recorded reference data and may change as evidence is revised. Sample coverage is uneven; recorded locations and archaeological associations do not establish personal origin or cultural identity.