A woman buried in Romania in the Neolithic era

Download PDF creates a visual, rasterized copy. Use Print for selectable text and better assistive-technology support.

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Preparing the available report content...

Your report will open automatically.

Skip to main content
Reference library / Sample profile

A woman buried in Romania in the Neolithic era

Explore the recorded context, genetic comparisons and research behind this reference sample.

RomaniaIclod Culture

A reference profile describes this sample. It does not establish a personal or family relationship.

AI portrait reconstruction for A woman buried in Romania in the Neolithic era
AI-generated artistic reconstruction, not a photograph of the individual.
Record

Sample details

Recorded details and available lineage markers.

Individual

village Iclod Eneolithic LN individual, Romania

Sample ID: rom046

Date Range

4711 BCE - 4546 BCE

Cultural Period

Iclod Culture

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

N1a1a1a3

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Social Role

Farmer (AI estimate, era-typical)

Geography

Location

Where this individual was discovered

Country Romania
Locality village Iclod, Cluj county
Coordinates 46.7441, 23.4840
Chronology

Date range

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

village Iclod Eneolithic LN individual, Romania 4711 BCE - 4546 BCE
Context

Historical context

Background information associated with the reference record.

The Iclod Culture is a lesser-known but fascinating Neolithic culture that emerged during the Danubian era, primarily situated around the Upper Danube basin in Central Europe. This culture, which thrived approximately between 5000 and 4500 BCE, is a part of the broader Neolithic Revolution period, characterized by the rapid spread of agriculture, sedentism, and significant technological advancements.

Geographic Setting

The Iclod Culture was centered in the Pannonian Basin, which includes present-day Hungary, Romania, Serbia, and Austria. This area is defined by its fertile plains, river systems, and temperate climate, making it an ideal location for early agricultural communities. The Danube River, Europe's second-longest river, provided a crucial conduit for trade, travel, and cultural exchange, further enhancing the growth and prosperity of the Iclod Culture.

Agricultural Practices

The Iclod Culture was built on an agricultural foundation, like many other Neolithic societies. This era saw significant advancements in farming technology. The introduction of polished stone tools, such as sickles and grinding stones, facilitated the efficient cultivation and harvesting of crops. The people of the Iclod Culture primarily grew cereals such as wheat and barley, along with pulses like lentils and peas. They also engaged in animal husbandry, raising domesticated animals like cattle, sheep, and goats, which provided not only meat but also milk, wool, and hides.

Settlement Patterns

The Iclod communities were predominantly composed of small to medium-sized settlements, often situated on elevated terrains or near riverbanks to minimize the risk of flooding. The villages typically consisted of longhouses built using local materials like timber, clay, and straw. These structures served both as family dwellings and storage areas for surplus goods. The settlement pattern reflects a tightly-knit community with kinship ties central to social organization.

Social Structure and Organization

The social structure of the Iclod Culture remains an area ripe for research, but archaeological evidence suggests a relatively egalitarian society. There is little evidence of pronounced social stratification, such as palaces or elaborate burials indicating a hierarchical elite. Instead, the culture likely functioned on a tribal basis, with decisions made by consensus or through the leadership of elders or respected individuals.

Material Culture

The material remains of the Iclod Culture reveal a sophisticated artistic expression. Pottery was a significant aspect of their material culture, often decorated with geometric patterns, lines, and spirals—reflective of aesthetic values and possibly symbolic meanings. Stone tools crafted with meticulous precision demonstrate their technological prowess, while clay figurines suggest a possible ritualistic or religious component to their culture. The existence of personal adornments, such as beads made from bone and shell, indicates an appreciation for personal decoration and status markers.

Trade and Economy

Situated along the Danube, the Iclod Culture engaged in trade with neighboring communities and cultural groups. The exchange network facilitated the movement of goods like obsidian, flint, and raw materials not locally available. Trade played a crucial role in cultural interaction, allowing for the exchange of ideas, technologies, and cultural practices, contributing to the dynamic nature of the Iclod Culture.

Religious Beliefs and Practices

Although concrete evidence of the specific religious beliefs of the Iclod people is sparse, the presence of figurines and symbolic pottery motifs suggests a spiritual component. These artifacts, along with burial practices involving grave goods, imply a belief in an afterlife or spiritual realm. Shamans or spiritual leaders might have held significant roles within the community, conducting rituals to ensure successful harvests or protection from adverse forces.

Conclusion

The Iclod Culture represents an intriguing chapter in the broader narrative of Neolithic Europe. Through the remnants of their settlements, agricultural practices, and material culture, they demonstrate a society that was innovative, interconnected, and rich in cultural expression. The Iclod Culture adds depth to our understanding of the Neolithic era, highlighting the regional variations and complexities of early agrarian societies in the Danubian basin.

Analysis

Genetic comparisons

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing statistical similarity to modern reference populations from different regions. The excavation site records where this individual was found, not a fixed modern genetic identity.

Europe 86.0%
Southern European 67.9%
Balkan 67.2%
Sardinian 0.7%
Northwestern European 18.1%
Northwestern European 18.1%
Asia 10.8%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 5.4%
Arabian 5.4%
Northern West Asian 5.4%
Anatolian 5.4%
Africa 3.2%
African Hunter-Gatherer 1.8%
African Hunter-Gatherer 1.8%
North African 1.4%
North African 1.4%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Romania in the Neolithic era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity. Cross-region similarity can reflect shared ancestry, population movement, continuity, or later admixture.

1
French Corsica
3.9437
2
Sardinian
4.0806
3
Belmonte Jew
5.3755
4
Italian Lombardy
5.4278
5
Italian Lazio
5.4793
6
Italian Umbria
5.5358
7
Italian Bergamo
5.6643
8
Italian Tuscany
5.6954
9
Spanish Murcia
5.7645
10
Spanish Menorca
5.7907
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
EN Starcevo Cris individual, Romania Starčevo-Criș Culture of Negrileşti 5612 BCE Negrilești (Galati, Negrilești), Romania View
EN Starcevo Cris individual, Romania Starčevo-Criș Culture of Grădinile 5801 BCE Grădinile, Romania View
Eneolithic LN Gumelnita individual, Romania Gumelnița Culture 4045 BCE Gumelnița (Călărași, Oltenita), Romania View
EN individual, Romania Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
EN individual, Romania Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
Danubian individual, Romania Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
N Boian individual, Romania Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
N Boian individual, Romania Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
N Boian individual, Romania Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
N Boian individual, Romania Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
Eneolithic LN Boian individual, Romania Boian Culture 4715 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
Eneolithic LN Boian individual, Romania Boian Culture 4721 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
Eneolithic LN Boian individual, Romania Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
N ELBK individual, Poland Early Linear Pottery Culture of Ludwinowo 4350 BCE Ludwinowo-6 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
N ELBK individual, Poland Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
N ELBK individual, Poland Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
N LLBK LLengyel individual, Poland Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4330 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
N LLBK LLengyel individual, Poland Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
N LLBK LLengyel individual, Poland Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
Eneolithic individual, Poland Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
N LLBK LLengyel individual, Poland Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
N LLBK LLengyel individual, Poland Late Lengyel Culture from Siniarzewo 4531 BCE Siniarzewo-1 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Aleksandrów County, Zakrzewo), Poland View
Eneolithic individual, Poland Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
Eneolithic individual, Poland Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
Early European individual, Poland Komornica Culture 5621 BCE Łojewo (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
Eneolithic individual, Poland Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
Mesolithic individual, Poland Kamienskie Culture Mesolithic 6814 BCE Kamienskie (Warmian-Masurian Province, Pisz County, Orzysz), Poland View
Danubian individual, Romania Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
village Iclod Eneolithic LN individual, Romania Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
village Decea Muresului Eneolithic LN Decea Muresului individual, Romania Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
Baciu Gura Baciului EN Starcevo Cris individual, Romania Starčevo-Criș Culture 5623 BCE village Baciu, Cluj county, Romania View
European Hunter-Gatherers individual, Romania Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
European Hunter-Gatherers individual, Romania Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
Proto-Indo-European individual, Ukraine Neolithic Ukraine 5471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
N individual, Ukraine Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4681 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
N individual, Ukraine Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4442 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
N individual, Ukraine Neolithic Ukraine 5356 BCE Vasylivka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
Eastern European Hunter-Gatherers individual, Ukraine Mesolithic Ukraine 6471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
Proto-Indo-European individual, Ukraine Serednii Stih culture 3701 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
Eastern European Hunter-Gatherers individual, Ukraine Mesolithic Ukraine 6066 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
N individual, Ukraine Neolithic Ukraine 4834 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
Eneolithic Serednii Stih individual, Ukraine Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
Proto-Indo-European individual, Ukraine Neolithic Ukraine 4836 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
Eneolithic Serednii Stih individual, Ukraine Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
Proto-Indo-European individual, Ukraine Neolithic Ukraine 5304 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
Eneolithic Serednii Stih individual, Ukraine Serednii Stih culture 4342 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
Epipaleolithic Mesolithic individual, Ukraine Ukrainian Epipaleolithic-Mesolithic Culture 8708 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
Pre-Indo-European individual, Ukraine Neolithic Nikolske Culture 5209 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
Pre-Indo-European individual, Ukraine Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4784 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
N individual, Ukraine Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4602 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
N individual, Ukraine Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5314 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
N individual, Ukraine Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5210 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
N individual, Ukraine Yasinovatka Culture 5357 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Eastern European individual, Ukraine Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5209 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Eastern European individual, Ukraine Yasinovatka Culture 4784 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Page 1
Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
village Iclod Eneolithic LN individual, Romania Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
Page 1
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

rom046,0.11460606,0.15549818,0.0182176,-0.03980264,0.04427002,-0.01713808,-0.0039462,0.00317078,0.0302302,0.05566144,-0.00271512,0.0102928,-0.01911538,-0.01036834,-0.01074302,0.00319596,0.01314932,0.00022486,0.00114818,-0.00323154,-0.00205488,0.00138942,-0.00786962,-0.0132917,0.00289102
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 30% off • Expires Nov 16