A woman buried in Romania in the Pleistocene era

Download PDF creates a visual, rasterized copy. Use Print for selectable text and better assistive-technology support.

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Preparing the available report content...

Your report will open automatically.

Skip to main content
Reference library / Sample profile

A woman buried in Romania in the Pleistocene era

Explore the recorded context, genetic comparisons and research behind this reference sample.

RomaniaEarly Upper Paleolithic Peștera Muierii, Romania

A reference profile describes this sample. It does not establish a personal or family relationship.

AI portrait reconstruction for A woman buried in Romania in the Pleistocene era
AI-generated artistic reconstruction, not a photograph of the individual.
Record

Sample details

Recorded details and available lineage markers.

Individual

European Paleolithic individual, Romania

Sample ID: PM1

Date Range

32735 BCE - 32181 BCE

Cultural Period

Early Upper Paleolithic Peștera Muierii, Romania

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

U6*

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Social Role

Gatherer (AI estimate, era-typical)

Geography

Location

Where this individual was discovered

Country Romania
Locality Baia de Fier. Peştera Muierii
Coordinates 45.1920, 23.7540
Chronology

Date range

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

European Paleolithic individual, Romania 32735 BCE - 32181 BCE
Context

Historical context

Background information associated with the reference record.

Overview

The early Upper Paleolithic occupation at Peștera Muierii anchors human activity in Romania during a late Pleistocene timeframe often summarized as 35,000–30,000 BCE. The “Peștera Muierii” cultural label reflects how archaeologists associate the cave’s lithic evidence with a recognizable Upper Paleolithic horizon.

Region & Environment

Peștera Muierii is in Romania’s karst region, where caves provide stable sheltered conditions compared with exposed landscapes. Around the site, local valleys and mixed habitats would have formed a changing ecological mosaic as Pleistocene climate shifted. These conditions would have influenced both the seasonal availability of prey and the timing of visits to the cave.

Historical Context

The period belongs to the broader Upper Paleolithic of Eastern Europe, when early modern human populations used increasingly widespread stone-tool approaches and returned to strategic landscape features. Cave occupations are central to this context because they preserve sequences of artifacts and activity areas that reflect repeated use over time.

Populations & Lifeways

People living during this horizon were hunter-gatherers, moving across landscapes to exploit seasonally varying resources. The cave setting suggests they arrived to conduct specific tasks—such as tool making/maintenance and processing animal products—while sheltering from weather. Archaeological interpretations generally treat such sites as locations within a broader mobility system rather than as year-round settlements.

Archaeology & Material Culture

The key evidence for the early Upper Paleolithic attribution comes from stone artifacts typical of the period: tools and manufacturing debris that indicate working and resharpening of cutting edges. While exact technological details depend on the stratified assemblage, the overall pattern supports regular engagement in lithic production and the practical use of those tools for daily tasks.

Culture & Society

Material culture points to learned technological traditions shared among groups within the Upper Paleolithic world. Such continuity implies communication and social learning, but it does not provide direct evidence for political authority, complex institutions, or named cultural identities. The social dimension visible in archaeology is thus mainly inferred from repeated activity patterns and technological style.

Legacy & Transition

Peștera Muierii’s early Upper Paleolithic phase helps document how hunter-gatherers adapted to late Pleistocene conditions in the Carpathian region. Later Upper Paleolithic developments and subsequent prehistoric changes would follow as climates, environments, and technologies shifted, altering the roles that caves and other landscape features played in daily life.

Analysis

Genetic comparisons

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing statistical similarity to modern reference populations from different regions. The excavation site records where this individual was found, not a fixed modern genetic identity.

Europe 63.0%
Northwestern European 35.3%
Finnish 19.2%
Northwestern European 7.3%
English 5.2%
Scandinavian 3.6%
Southern European 17.8%
Iberian 13.0%
Sardinian 4.8%
Eastern European 9.9%
Eastern European 9.9%
Asia 17.9%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 12.7%
Indian 12.7%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 3.9%
Indonesian Khmer Thai Myanma 1.9%
Chinese 1.7%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 1.3%
Arabian 1.3%
Africa 10.7%
North African 4.1%
Egyptian 3.8%
African Hunter-Gatherer 2.2%
African Hunter-Gatherer 2.2%
West African 2.2%
Ghanaian, Liberian, Sierra Leonean 2.2%
Northern East African 2.2%
Ethiopian 1.9%
Oceania 5.9%
Melanesian 5.9%
Papuan 5.9%
America 2.6%
America 2.6%
Native American 2.6%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Romania in the Pleistocene era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity. Cross-region similarity can reflect shared ancestry, population movement, continuity, or later admixture.

1
Roma Bilbao
8.9034
2
Roma Granada
9.0452
3
Roma Madrid
9.2655
4
Roma Porto
9.4288
5
Roma Barcelona
9.6137
6
Roma Balkans
10.1276
7
Tatar Mishar
10.8220
8
Tatar Kazan
10.8387
9
Turkish Rumeli
10.8615
10
Turkish Balikesir
11.1636
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
European Paleolithic individual, Romania Early Upper Paleolithic Peștera Muierii, Romania 32735 BCE Baia de Fier. Peştera Muierii, Romania View
Palaeolithic individual, Romania 32735 BCE Baia de Fier. Peştera Muierii, Romania View
Palaeolithic individual, Romania 32735 BCE Baia de Fier. Peştera Muierii, Romania View
Page 1
Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
European Paleolithic individual, Romania Early Upper Paleolithic Peștera Muierii, Romania 32735 BCE Baia de Fier. Peştera Muierii, Romania View
Page 1
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

PM1,0.04698404,0.03813646,0.00534384,0.04827286,0.0228087,-0.0079827,-0.00906228,0.00225452,0.0212795,0.00692494,-0.00601934,2.854E-05,-0.00405992,-0.00185218,0.00436232,-0.00297786,-0.00152724,0.00081386,0.00264436,-0.00142234,0.0018617,0.00099238,-0.00296976,0.00529132,0.00326323
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 30% off • Expires Nov 16