I20750 - A man buried in Hungary in the Middle Bronze Age era

Download PDF creates a visual, rasterized copy. Use Print for selectable text and better assistive-technology support.

Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A man buried in Hungary in the Middle Bronze Age era
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Hungary in the Middle Bronze Age era

A man buried in Hungary during the Middle Bronze Age Füzesabony Culture, Hungary

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

I20750
2300 BCE - 1600 BCE
Male
Hungary
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I20750

Date Range

2300 BCE - 1600 BCE

Cultural Period

Middle Bronze Age Füzesabony Culture, Hungary

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

Not available

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Social Role

Farmer (AI estimate, era-typical)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Hungary
Locality Polgar Kenderfold
Coordinates 47.8664, 21.1199
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I20750 2300 BCE - 1600 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Region & Environment

Füzesabony sites in Hungary are associated with the Carpathian Basin’s productive lowlands and river corridors. These environments supported agriculture and animal husbandry and helped connect communities through natural routes that also facilitated contact between different Bronze Age regions.

Historical Context

The Middle Bronze Age was a period of intensifying Bronze Age systems, including more regular movement of materials and ideas. In Central Europe, shifting styles and artifact traditions often track broader changes in production and social display; the Füzesabony horizon belongs to these developments while remaining archaeologically distinguishable by its own ceramic and burial patterns.

Populations & Lifeways

Communities represented by the Füzesabony Culture were likely organized around farming and household production, with routine cultivation and herding sustaining daily needs. Settlement patterns suggest the persistence of village life and regional interaction rather than complete abandonment or rapid demographic replacement.

Archaeology & Material Culture

Archaeological identification relies heavily on pottery styles, including characteristic vessel shapes and decorative treatments, which provide a primary diagnostic for the Füzesabony horizon. Metal and other imported or rare materials appear in some contexts, indicating that even largely agricultural communities engaged in exchange. Settlement remains and craft-related finds underline ongoing local manufacture of utilitarian items.

Culture & Society

The distribution of grave goods and differences in mortuary treatment point to social variation within communities. Rather than uniform burial practices, assemblages show that some individuals or households had access to more prestigious objects, possibly reflecting differences in wealth, status, or roles tied to regional networks.

Legacy & Transition

Toward the end of the Middle Bronze Age interval, Füzesabony-style patterns give way to later Bronze Age expressions. The transition likely involved both cultural interaction and changes in material preferences, while earlier traditions were gradually replaced by newer ceramic and burial conventions in Hungary.

Chapter V

Genetics

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing statistical similarity to modern reference populations from different regions. The excavation site records where this individual was found, not a fixed modern genetic identity.

Europe 98.6%
Northwestern European 62.3%
Scandinavian 26.3%
English 21.3%
Northwestern European 14.7%
Eastern European 23.6%
Eastern European 23.6%
Southern European 12.7%
Balkan 10.7%
Iberian 2.0%
Africa 1.4%
African Hunter-Gatherer 1.4%
African Hunter-Gatherer 1.4%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in Hungary in the Middle Bronze Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity. Cross-region similarity can reflect shared ancestry, population movement, continuity, or later admixture.

1
Swedish
2.4433
2
Czech
2.4943
3
Polish
2.5644
4
Polish Kashubian
2.5797
5
German Hamburg
2.7312
6
Polish Silesian
2.8757
7
German East
2.9384
8
Slovakian
2.9871
9
Ukrainian Dnipro
3.2374
10
Ukrainian Rivne
3.2678
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
I11912 Glavanesti Culture of Romania 3500 BCE Glăvăneşti, Romania View
I11902 The Bodrogkeresztur Culture 4500 BCE Urziceni, Romania View
I11906 The Bodrogkeresztur Culture 4500 BCE Urziceni, Romania View
I11929 Middle Neolithic Alföld Linear Pottery Culture, Hungary 4300 BCE Polgár-Ferenci hát. M3-31, Hungary View
I11933 Middle Neolithic Alföld Linear Pottery Culture, Hungary 4300 BCE Polgár-Ferenci hát. M3-31, Hungary View
I20767 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 4000 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert; Great Hungarian Plain. Borsodi-Mezőség, Hungary View
I20766 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 400 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert, Hungary View
I20770 Late Bronze Age to Early Iron Age Hungary 1700 BCE Mezőkeresztes-Cethalom. M3-10 lelőhely; Great Hungarian Plain. Borsodi-Mezőség, Hungary View
I20773 Late Bronze Age Hungary 1700 BCE Besenyszög Berek-ér partja, Hungary View
I11683 Late Bronze Age to Early Iron Age Hungary 1700 BCE Mezőkeresztes-Cethalom. M3-10 lelőhely; Great Hungarian Plain. Borsodi-Mezőség, Hungary View
I20747 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 400 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert, Hungary View
I20749 Late Bronze Age Halomsíros (Tumulus) Culture, Hungary 1700 BCE Hajdudorog-Szallasfold, Hungary View
I20750 Middle Bronze Age Füzesabony Culture, Hungary 2300 BCE Polgar Kenderfold, Hungary View
I20751 Late Bronze Age Hungary 1500 BCE Besenyszög Berek-ér partja. Köröm-Kápolnadomb, Hungary View
I20752 The La Tene Culture in Hungary 500 BCE Besenyszög Berek-ér partja. Köröm-Kápolnadomb, Hungary View
I20756 Old Bering Sea Culture Ekven, Russia 970 CE Chukotka. Bering Strait. Ekven, Russia View
I4112 5500 BCE Dereivka I, Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
I20750 Middle Bronze Age Füzesabony Culture, Hungary 2300 BCE Polgar Kenderfold, Hungary View
I11659 1930 BCE Mezőzombor-Községi-temető (Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Szerencs), Hungary View
I11661 1787 BCE Mezőzombor-Községi-temető (Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Szerencs), Hungary View
I11664 1733 BCE Mezőzombor-Községi-temető (Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Szerencs), Hungary View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

A minimally destructive protocol for DNA extraction from ancient teeth

Authors Harney É, Cheronet O, Fernandes DM, Sirak K, Mah M et al.
Abstract

Ancient DNA sampling methods-although optimized for efficient DNA extraction-are destructive, relying on drilling or cutting and powdering (parts of) bones and teeth. As the field of ancient DNA has grown, so have concerns about the impact of destructive sampling of the skeletal remains from which ancient DNA is obtained. Due to a particularly high concentration of endogenous DNA, the cementum of tooth roots is often targeted for ancient DNA sampling, but destructive sampling methods of the cementum often result in the loss of at least one entire root. Here, we present a minimally destructive method for extracting ancient DNA from dental cementum present on the surface of tooth roots. This method does not require destructive drilling or grinding, and, following extraction, the tooth remains safe to handle and suitable for most morphological studies, as well as other biochemical studies, such as radiocarbon dating. We extracted and sequenced ancient DNA from 30 teeth (and nine corresponding petrous bones) using this minimally destructive extraction method in addition to a typical tooth sampling method. We find that the minimally destructive method can provide ancient DNA that is of comparable quality to extracts produced from teeth that have undergone destructive sampling processes. Further, we find that a rigorous cleaning of the tooth surface combining diluted bleach and UV light irradiation seems sufficient to minimize external contaminants usually removed through the physical removal of a superficial layer when sampling through regular powdering methods.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

I20750,0.13282292,0.12380882,0.0667695,0.06245988,0.03670158,0.02512698,0.00688634,0.01210298,0.00123018,-0.01673846,-0.00794206,-0.00142258,0.00774156,0.00649104,0.0045297,0.0039756,-0.00332274,0.00051984,0.00230576,0.00250006,0.00230288,0.00024126,0.00182584,0.00684814,-0.00165339
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 25% off Expires Jul 29