Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A man buried in Hungary in the Iron Age era
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Hungary in the Iron Age era

A man buried in Hungary during the Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

I20766
400 BCE - 100 CE
Male
Hungary
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I20766

Date Range

400 BCE - 100 CE

Cultural Period

Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

Not available

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Social Role

Warrior (AI estimate, era-typical)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Hungary
Locality Kesznyéten-Szérűskert
Coordinates 47.9822, 21.0604
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I20766 400 BCE - 100 CE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Region & Environment

Scythian-period communities in Hungary occupied the Carpathian Basin’s varied landscapes—plains and river valleys suited to agriculture and herding, along with routes that facilitated long-distance movement. Seasonal grazing and access to waterways supported mixed subsistence strategies.

Historical Context

From the late 8th to 4th centuries BCE, Central Europe experienced intensified interactions among societies associated with steppe and settled traditions. While Hungary’s local communities retained distinctive practices, wider networks influenced artifact types, metallurgy, and stylistic choices.

Populations & Lifeways

Lifeways were likely a blend of settled farming and animal management, with some communities participating in exchange and possibly benefiting from or responding to mobile groups moving across steppe and forest-steppe corridors. Household labor remained central to food production, while specialists contributed to metalworking and other crafts.

Archaeology & Material Culture

Archaeological material for this period commonly includes ceramics and metal objects that can reflect steppe-influenced contacts. Iron goods and associated toolkits illustrate the technological backdrop of the Iron Age, while decorative motifs and select assemblage combinations help situate the Scythian horizon in regional sequences.

Culture & Society

Cultural identity appears in the persistence of local ceramic and settlement traditions, coupled with adoption or modification of elements linked to broader steppe connections. Social organization is best inferred through the distribution of particular artifact categories—suggesting differences in access to valued items and roles within communities.

Legacy & Transition

The Scythian phase contributes to understanding how Central European societies negotiated steppe interactions during the first millennium BCE. Its archaeological signature provides a basis for tracking later Iron Age and subsequent historic-era developments in Hungary.

Chapter V

Genetics

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing statistical similarity to modern reference populations from different regions. The excavation site records where this individual was found, not a fixed modern genetic identity.

Europe 100.0%
Northwestern European 42.7%
Northwestern European 33.4%
English 7.6%
Finnish 1.7%
Eastern European 31.4%
Eastern European 31.4%
Southern European 26.0%
Iberian 17.3%
Balkan 6.9%
Sardinian 1.8%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in Hungary in the Iron Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity. Cross-region similarity can reflect shared ancestry, population movement, continuity, or later admixture.

1
German East
2.0810
2
Czech
2.3681
3
German Hamburg
2.5473
4
German Erlangen
2.9135
5
Hungarian
3.0105
6
Slovenian
3.0754
7
German
3.1525
8
Austrian
3.2335
9
Ukrainian Lviv
3.3169
10
Polish
3.3313
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
I11912 Glavanesti Culture of Romania 3500 BCE Glăvăneşti, Romania View
I11902 The Bodrogkeresztur Culture 4500 BCE Urziceni, Romania View
I11906 The Bodrogkeresztur Culture 4500 BCE Urziceni, Romania View
I11929 Middle Neolithic Alföld Linear Pottery Culture, Hungary 4300 BCE Polgár-Ferenci hát. M3-31, Hungary View
I11933 Middle Neolithic Alföld Linear Pottery Culture, Hungary 4300 BCE Polgár-Ferenci hát. M3-31, Hungary View
I20767 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 4000 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert; Great Hungarian Plain. Borsodi-Mezőség, Hungary View
I20766 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 400 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert, Hungary View
I20770 Late Bronze Age to Early Iron Age Hungary 1700 BCE Mezőkeresztes-Cethalom. M3-10 lelőhely; Great Hungarian Plain. Borsodi-Mezőség, Hungary View
I20773 Late Bronze Age Hungary 1700 BCE Besenyszög Berek-ér partja, Hungary View
I11683 Late Bronze Age to Early Iron Age Hungary 1700 BCE Mezőkeresztes-Cethalom. M3-10 lelőhely; Great Hungarian Plain. Borsodi-Mezőség, Hungary View
I20747 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 400 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert, Hungary View
I20749 Late Bronze Age Halomsíros (Tumulus) Culture, Hungary 1700 BCE Hajdudorog-Szallasfold, Hungary View
I20750 Middle Bronze Age Füzesabony Culture, Hungary 2300 BCE Polgar Kenderfold, Hungary View
I20751 Late Bronze Age Hungary 1500 BCE Besenyszög Berek-ér partja. Köröm-Kápolnadomb, Hungary View
I20752 The La Tene Culture in Hungary 500 BCE Besenyszög Berek-ér partja. Köröm-Kápolnadomb, Hungary View
I20756 Old Bering Sea Culture Ekven, Russia 970 CE Chukotka. Bering Strait. Ekven, Russia View
I4112 5500 BCE Dereivka I, Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
I20767 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 4000 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert; Great Hungarian Plain. Borsodi-Mezőség, Hungary View
I20766 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 400 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert, Hungary View
I20747 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 400 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert, Hungary View
DA195 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 772 BCE , Hungary View
DA194 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 513 BCE , Hungary View
DA191 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 749 BCE , Hungary View
DA198 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 737 BCE , Hungary View
DA197 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 726 BCE , Hungary View
I11669 566 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert (Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Tiszaújváros), Hungary View
I11673 566 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert (Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Tiszaújváros), Hungary View
I11674 566 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert (Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Tiszaújváros), Hungary View
I11675 566 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert (Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Tiszaújváros), Hungary View
I11680 566 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert (Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Tiszaújváros), Hungary View
I11681 566 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert (Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Tiszaújváros), Hungary View
I11682 566 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert (Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Tiszaújváros), Hungary View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

A minimally destructive protocol for DNA extraction from ancient teeth

Authors Harney É, Cheronet O, Fernandes DM, Sirak K, Mah M et al.
Abstract

Ancient DNA sampling methods-although optimized for efficient DNA extraction-are destructive, relying on drilling or cutting and powdering (parts of) bones and teeth. As the field of ancient DNA has grown, so have concerns about the impact of destructive sampling of the skeletal remains from which ancient DNA is obtained. Due to a particularly high concentration of endogenous DNA, the cementum of tooth roots is often targeted for ancient DNA sampling, but destructive sampling methods of the cementum often result in the loss of at least one entire root. Here, we present a minimally destructive method for extracting ancient DNA from dental cementum present on the surface of tooth roots. This method does not require destructive drilling or grinding, and, following extraction, the tooth remains safe to handle and suitable for most morphological studies, as well as other biochemical studies, such as radiocarbon dating. We extracted and sequenced ancient DNA from 30 teeth (and nine corresponding petrous bones) using this minimally destructive extraction method in addition to a typical tooth sampling method. We find that the minimally destructive method can provide ancient DNA that is of comparable quality to extracts produced from teeth that have undergone destructive sampling processes. Further, we find that a rigorous cleaning of the tooth surface combining diluted bleach and UV light irradiation seems sufficient to minimize external contaminants usually removed through the physical removal of a superficial layer when sampling through regular powdering methods.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

I20766,0.12971686,0.13466398,0.0694403,0.04722508,0.04691404,0.01879126,0.00671512,0.01213942,0.01110696,-0.00062362,-0.0069129,8.572E-05,0.00201646,0.0125366,5.024E-05,0.0007825,-0.00815,-0.00123776,0.00176204,0.0004586,0.00275692,0.00103214,5.204E-05,-0.00560062,0.00078453
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 25% off Expires Jul 26