Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A woman buried in Hungary in the Late Bronze Age era
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Hungary in the Late Bronze Age era

A woman buried in Hungary during the Late Bronze Age Hungary

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

I20773
1700 BCE - 800 BCE
Female
Hungary
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I20773

Date Range

1700 BCE - 800 BCE

Cultural Period

Late Bronze Age Hungary

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

Not available

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N/A (Female)

Social Role

Laborer (AI estimate, era-typical)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Hungary
Locality Besenyszög Berek-ér partja
Coordinates 47.2141, 20.2613
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I20773 1700 BCE - 800 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Overview

The Late Bronze Age in Hungary (c. 1300–800 BCE) belongs to a period when Central European societies were closely connected through exchange of metals and prestige goods. Archaeology emphasizes bronze production, settlement continuity in many areas, and funerary traditions that vary across local landscapes.

Region & Environment

Hungary’s varied topography—river valleys, plains, and upland zones—provided fertile fields, pasture, and access to routes for moving goods. Such settings supported mixed economies and encouraged both stable settlement and periodic interaction between neighboring communities.

Historical Context

Across much of Central Europe, Late Bronze Age developments reflect shifting social organization and changing patterns of long-distance contact. While broad cultural labels are used, the experience of communities at local scales would have depended on access to resources (especially copper and tin supply chains) and on participation in regional trade.

Populations & Lifeways

Households likely combined crop cultivation with herding and household crafts. Bronzeworking required specialized knowledge and access to raw materials, suggesting that some communities had the organization and networks needed to commission or acquire bronze objects.

Archaeology & Material Culture

Material culture for this horizon typically includes:

  • bronze tools and ornaments (produced through established metalworking practices),
  • ceramic vessel forms and manufacturing traditions that help with regional dating,
  • funerary remains, including cremation and cemetery organization where preserved and identifiable. Because burial customs and artifact styles can change between adjacent regions, assemblages are best read as part of a mosaic of interconnected communities.

Culture & Society

Late Bronze Age societies in the Carpathian region appear to have valued both everyday metal use and display items, with social differentiation expressed through access to bronze goods and placement within burial contexts. Craft and exchange networks supported skilled production and circulation of materials.

Legacy & Transition

As the Bronze Age ended, metal technologies and social patterns shifted, setting the stage for the emergence of early Iron Age cultural horizons. The transition is visible archaeologically through changes in burial practice, artifact assemblages, and the growing prominence of iron in later periods.

Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
I11912 Glavanesti Culture of Romania 3500 BCE Glăvăneşti, Romania View
I11902 The Bodrogkeresztur Culture 4500 BCE Urziceni, Romania View
I11906 The Bodrogkeresztur Culture 4500 BCE Urziceni, Romania View
I11929 Middle Neolithic Alföld Linear Pottery Culture, Hungary 4300 BCE Polgár-Ferenci hát. M3-31, Hungary View
I11933 Middle Neolithic Alföld Linear Pottery Culture, Hungary 4300 BCE Polgár-Ferenci hát. M3-31, Hungary View
I20767 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 4000 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert; Great Hungarian Plain. Borsodi-Mezőség, Hungary View
I20766 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 400 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert, Hungary View
I20770 Late Bronze Age to Early Iron Age Hungary 1700 BCE Mezőkeresztes-Cethalom. M3-10 lelőhely; Great Hungarian Plain. Borsodi-Mezőség, Hungary View
I20773 Late Bronze Age Hungary 1700 BCE Besenyszög Berek-ér partja, Hungary View
I11683 Late Bronze Age to Early Iron Age Hungary 1700 BCE Mezőkeresztes-Cethalom. M3-10 lelőhely; Great Hungarian Plain. Borsodi-Mezőség, Hungary View
I20747 Iron Age Scythian Culture, Hungary 400 BCE Kesznyéten-Szérűskert, Hungary View
I20749 Late Bronze Age Halomsíros (Tumulus) Culture, Hungary 1700 BCE Hajdudorog-Szallasfold, Hungary View
I20750 Middle Bronze Age Füzesabony Culture, Hungary 2300 BCE Polgar Kenderfold, Hungary View
I20751 Late Bronze Age Hungary 1500 BCE Besenyszög Berek-ér partja. Köröm-Kápolnadomb, Hungary View
I20752 The La Tene Culture in Hungary 500 BCE Besenyszög Berek-ér partja. Köröm-Kápolnadomb, Hungary View
I20756 Old Bering Sea Culture Ekven, Russia 970 CE Chukotka. Bering Strait. Ekven, Russia View
I4112 5500 BCE Dereivka I, Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
I20773 Late Bronze Age Hungary 1700 BCE Besenyszög Berek-ér partja, Hungary View
I20751 Late Bronze Age Hungary 1500 BCE Besenyszög Berek-ér partja. Köröm-Kápolnadomb, Hungary View
I25504 Late Bronze Age Hungary 1050 BCE Vas county. Kápolnadomb. Gór, Hungary View
I25505 Late Bronze Age Hungary 1046 BCE Vas county. Kápolnadomb. Gór, Hungary View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

A minimally destructive protocol for DNA extraction from ancient teeth

Authors Harney É, Cheronet O, Fernandes DM, Sirak K, Mah M et al.
Abstract

Ancient DNA sampling methods-although optimized for efficient DNA extraction-are destructive, relying on drilling or cutting and powdering (parts of) bones and teeth. As the field of ancient DNA has grown, so have concerns about the impact of destructive sampling of the skeletal remains from which ancient DNA is obtained. Due to a particularly high concentration of endogenous DNA, the cementum of tooth roots is often targeted for ancient DNA sampling, but destructive sampling methods of the cementum often result in the loss of at least one entire root. Here, we present a minimally destructive method for extracting ancient DNA from dental cementum present on the surface of tooth roots. This method does not require destructive drilling or grinding, and, following extraction, the tooth remains safe to handle and suitable for most morphological studies, as well as other biochemical studies, such as radiocarbon dating. We extracted and sequenced ancient DNA from 30 teeth (and nine corresponding petrous bones) using this minimally destructive extraction method in addition to a typical tooth sampling method. We find that the minimally destructive method can provide ancient DNA that is of comparable quality to extracts produced from teeth that have undergone destructive sampling processes. Further, we find that a rigorous cleaning of the tooth surface combining diluted bleach and UV light irradiation seems sufficient to minimize external contaminants usually removed through the physical removal of a superficial layer when sampling through regular powdering methods.

Use code for 25% off Expires Jul 27