Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I5072
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Croatia in the Neolithic era

I5072
5657 BCE - 5558 BCE
Male
Early Neolithic Impressa Culture, Croatia
Croatia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I5072

Date Range

5657 BCE - 5558 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

H7c

Y-DNA Haplogroup

G-PF3177

Cultural Period

Early Neolithic Impressa Culture, Croatia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Croatia
Locality Kargadur
Coordinates 43.3514, 16.4618
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I5072 5657 BCE - 5558 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Early Neolithic Impressa Culture in Croatia is a fascinating archaeological and cultural period that marks a significant transition from hunter-gatherer societies to more settled, agricultural communities. This culture is named after the characteristic impressed ware pottery, which serves as a key distinguishing feature. Spanning approximately from 6000 to 5500 BCE, the Impressa Culture is part of the larger Neolithic revolution, involving changes in lifestyle, economy, and social organization.

Geographic Context

The Impressa Culture in Croatia is primarily located along the Adriatic coast and its hinterlands, including parts of the Dalmatian coast and Istrian peninsula. This region is characterized by its moderate Mediterranean climate, with fertile valleys and access to the sea, providing a conducive environment for early agricultural practices.

Economic Practices

The economic foundation of the Impressa Culture relied heavily on early forms of agriculture and animal husbandry, marking a departure from the Mesolithic reliance on hunting and gathering. The cultivation of grains such as wheat and barley, alongside legumes, formed the backbone of their diet. Additionally, the domestication of animals like sheep, goats, and cattle further supplemented their food resources, providing not only meat but also materials such as wool and leather.

Fishing and the gathering of mollusks along the coast supplemented their diet, reflecting the importance of both terrestrial and marine resources. This combination of agricultural and marine practices indicates a diversified economic strategy that allowed the Impressa people to thrive in their environment.

Material Culture and Technology

Central to the Impressa Culture is its pottery, characterized by a technique of decoration involving impressions made with tools or fingertips on wet clay before firing. The pottery often includes simple shapes like bowls and storage vessels, serving both practical and ceremonial purposes. These impressed designs not only served an aesthetic function but also may have played a role in communal identity and cultural expression.

Tool technology during this period included polished stone axes, sickle blades for harvesting, and various bone and antler tools. Flint knapping continued to advance, providing a variety of blade tools which facilitated daily tasks ranging from woodworking to food preparation.

Settlement Patterns

Settlements of the Impressa Culture were relatively small and scattered, often located near rivers or coastal areas to take advantage of the diverse resources. The houses were likely made of perishable materials such as wood, reeds, and clay, with some evidence suggesting semi-subterranean structures or huts. Settlements may have had a communal aspect, with evidence of shared facilities for food storage and processing.

Social Structure and Organization

While definitive details on the social structure of the Impressa Culture remain somewhat speculative, the shift to agriculture likely prompted changes in social organization. The establishment of relatively permanent settlements could have led to more defined roles within the community and hierarchical structures based on resource management and distribution.

Trade likely played a role in Impressa society, as suggested by the distribution of similar pottery styles and tool types across the region. This indicates some level of interaction and exchange with nearby cultures, facilitating the spread of ideas and technologies.

Ritual and Symbolism

Although direct evidence for religious or ritual practices is sparse, the uniformity and intricacy of pottery designs suggest some symbolic or ceremonial importance. Burial practices, though not extensively documented, would provide further insights into their spiritual beliefs and social stratification, if available.

Conclusion

The Impressa Culture in Early Neolithic Croatia represents a crucial link in the transition to agricultural societies in Europe. By adopting farming and animal husbandry, these communities laid the groundwork for more complex societal structures. Their legacy is preserved in the archaeological record, particularly through the iconic pottery that carries the imprints of early European innovation and cultural identity. As research continues, the Impressa Culture remains a key area of study for understanding the broader Neolithic transformation throughout the Adriatic region and beyond.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I5072 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Neolithic Farmers 75.1%
European Hunter-Gatherers 20.6%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 4.3%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Europe 83.3%
Southern European 83.3%
Italian 34.1%
Sardinian 30.6%
Iberian 18.6%
Asia 13.3%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 10.1%
Arabian 5.6%
Levantine 4.5%
Northern West Asian 3.3%
Cypriot 3.3%
Africa 3.4%
North African 3.4%
North African 3.4%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in Croatia in the Neolithic era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Sardinian
4.0032
2
Belmonte Jew
6.6154
3
French Corsica
6.9101
4
Italian Lazio
7.7167
5
Sicilian West
7.8866
6
Italian Umbria
8.0085
7
Maltese
8.1895
8
Italian Campania
8.2146
9
Sicilian East
8.2220
10
Italian Calabria
8.2670
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

The genomic history of southeastern Europe

Authors Mathieson I, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Posth C
Abstract

Farming was first introduced to Europe in the mid-seventh millennium bc, and was associated with migrants from Anatolia who settled in the southeast before spreading throughout Europe. Here, to understand the dynamics of this process, we analysed genome-wide ancient DNA data from 225 individuals who lived in southeastern Europe and surrounding regions between 12000 and 500 bc. We document a west-east cline of ancestry in indigenous hunter-gatherers and, in eastern Europe, the early stages in the formation of Bronze Age steppe ancestry. We show that the first farmers of northern and western Europe dispersed through southeastern Europe with limited hunter-gatherer admixture, but that some early groups in the southeast mixed extensively with hunter-gatherers without the sex-biased admixture that prevailed later in the north and west. We also show that southeastern Europe continued to be a nexus between east and west after the arrival of farmers, with intermittent genetic contact with steppe populations occurring up to 2,000 years earlier than the migrations from the steppe that ultimately replaced much of the population of northern Europe.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I5072 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I5072,0.10521942,0.1592723,0.00964682,-0.05998724,0.0497305,-0.02893998,-0.00431894,0.00433488,0.04360202,0.06615706,-0.00053022,0.00952096,-0.0156171,-0.01321852,-0.01191992,0.00657166,0.0127363,0.00014896,-0.00200476,-0.00080876,0.00027646,0.0040939,-0.01044698,-0.01731566,0.00277746
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27