Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I6362
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Mongolia in the Middle Late Bronze Age era

I6362
1044 BCE - 917 BCE
Female
Late Bronze Age Center West 5, Mongolia
Mongolia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I6362

Date Range

1044 BCE - 917 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

D4b1

Cultural Period

Late Bronze Age Center West 5, Mongolia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Mongolia
Locality Khovd. Bulgan sum. Khudzhirtyn gol I. kurgan 2
Coordinates 46.0636, 92.0342
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I6362 1044 BCE - 917 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Late Bronze Age in the Center West region of Mongolia, often characterized within broader Eurasian Steppe cultures, represents a fascinating period marked by significant cultural developments and interactions with neighboring regions. The area of interest, often labeled as \LBA Center West 5" in archaeological discourse, provides insights into the adaptive strategies, social structures, and cultural expressions of the people inhabiting this region during the Late Bronze Age. This period roughly spans from the late second millennium BCE to the early first millennium BCE.

Geographical and Environmental Context:

Mongolia's Center West region is a landscape dominated by vast steppe, mountains, and desert areas, providing diverse habitats that have historically supported nomadic pastoralism. These environments influenced the lifestyles, economic activities, and cultural practices of the Late Bronze Age inhabitants. The harsh climate and seasonal variations necessitated a highly mobile lifestyle, with communities often migrating to utilize different grazing areas for their herds.

Subsistence and Economy:

Economically, the Late Bronze Age communities in this region were primarily pastoralists, relying heavily on livestock such as sheep, goats, cattle, and horses. The horse, in particular, played a crucial role not only as a source of mobility and transport but also as a symbol of social status and power. Evidence suggests a mixed subsistence strategy that also included hunting and limited agriculture, though the latter was constrained by the region’s climatic conditions.

The development of metallurgy during this period had a profound impact on local economies. The ability to produce bronze tools and weapons marked technological advances that facilitated more efficient herding, hunting, and warfare, which in turn influenced social structures and regional influence.

Social Structure and Political Organization:

The Late Bronze Age societies in Mongolia were organized into tribes or clans, with social hierarchies likely based on kinship, wealth (measured in livestock), and military prowess. The mobility of these groups allowed for flexible political structures, often leading to the formation of confederations or alliances that could unite under strong leaders temporarily, especially during times of warfare or economic necessity.

Archaeological evidence from burials and settlements indicates the presence of social stratification. Elite individuals were often buried with rich grave goods, including weapons, ornaments, and horse gear, suggesting the emergence of warrior elites who played crucial roles in these societies.

Cultural and Religious Practices:

Culturally, the Late Bronze Age in Mongolia's Center West was characterized by rich oral traditions that likely included epic storytelling, music, and ritual performances. These cultural expressions were crucial in maintaining social cohesion and transmitting knowledge and cultural values across generations.

Religious beliefs during this period were probably animistic and shamanistic, with spiritual practices focused on the natural environment and ancestor worship. The construction of megalithic structures such as deer stones and khirigsuurs (circular burial mounds) reflects complex religious and ceremonial practices. These structures, often aligned with celestial events, highlight an advanced understanding of astronomy and its incorporation into ritual activities.

Interactions and Influences:

Mongolia's Center West region was not isolated; it was part of a broader network of cultures across the Eurasian Steppe. The period saw significant cultural exchanges facilitated by trade routes that connected East and West. Goods such as metals, textiles, and pottery, as well as ideas and technologies, flowed through these networks. As a result, the Late Bronze Age cultures in Mongolia absorbed and adapted diverse influences, which is evident in the similarities observed in material culture across the steppe.

Conclusion:

In sum, the Late Bronze Age Center West in Mongolia represents a dynamic cultural milieu characterized by pastoral nomadism, technological advancements in metallurgy, and complex social and religious structures. Despite environmental challenges, these cultures thrived and left a lasting legacy evidenced through archaeological findings that continue to inform our understanding of prehistoric human societies on the Eurasian Steppe."

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I6362 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Asians 38.3%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 28.7%
European Hunter-Gatherers 20.5%
Neolithic Farmers 12.5%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 62.5%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 37.6%
Central Asian 21.5%
Pakistan 16.1%
Northern Asian 12.5%
Siberian 11.8%
Mongolian 0.8%
Northern West Asian 10.0%
Caucasian 10.0%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 2.1%
Indonesian Khmer Thai Myanma 1.4%
Chinese 0.6%
Europe 33.4%
Northwestern European 18.9%
English 14.8%
Scandinavian 2.3%
Finnish 1.8%
Eastern European 14.5%
Eastern European 14.5%
America 4.1%
America 4.1%
Native American 4.1%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Mongolia in the Middle Late Bronze Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Besermyan
5.8772
2
Tatar Lipka
6.0306
3
Udmurt
6.3176
4
Tatar Crimean Steppe
7.0376
5
Bashkir
7.1046
6
Tatar Kazan
7.2719
7
Turkmen
8.2240
8
Khanty O1
8.2934
9
Turkmen Uzbekistan
8.3208
10
Chuvash
9.0079
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I6362 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I6362,0.09573246,-0.0403324,0.04660858,0.0422466,-0.03530782,0.00375646,-0.0033352,-0.00460938,-0.0111762,-0.02069672,0.00455248,-0.00117192,0.00285552,-0.02142818,0.00629778,-0.0033975,-0.01178998,-0.0013879,-0.002272,-0.00310206,-0.0100068,0.00669442,-0.00146438,0.00410964,-0.0052003
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27