Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of KhoesanLeipzigHunter
Ancient Individual

A man buried in South Africa in the Modern era

KhoesanLeipzigHunter
403 BCE - 201 BCE
Male
South Africa 2200 Years Before Present
South Africa
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

KhoesanLeipzigHunter

Date Range

403 BCE - 201 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

L0d2c1

Y-DNA Haplogroup

A-M51

Cultural Period

South Africa 2200 Years Before Present

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country South Africa
Locality St. Helena
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

KhoesanLeipzigHunter 403 BCE - 201 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Around 2200 years before the present, approximately 200 BC, South Africa was in a period of transition and cultural dynamism marked by the Bantu expansion. This era predates significant written records specific to Southern Africa's interior, so much of our understanding comes from archaeology, linguistics, and later historiographies.

The Bantu Expansion: By 200 BC, Bantu-speaking peoples were likely migrating into the southern regions of Africa from their original homelands in West-Central Africa. This migration wasn't a single, coordinated movement but a gradual diffusion over centuries. The Bantu expansion is one of the most significant series of migrations in human history, spreading not only people but shared languages, cultures, and technologies across sub-Saharan Africa.

Cultural and Technological Developments:

  • Iron Age: This period in sub-Saharan Africa saw the introduction and refinement of iron-working, which was transformative for societies. The ability to forge iron not only improved agricultural yields with better tools but also enhanced hunting and warfare capabilities.

  • Agriculture: The Bantu brought with them agricultural practices, cultivating crops such as yams, millet, and sorghum. This agricultural knowledge enabled more stable and sedentary communities as opposed to primarily hunter-gatherer lifestyles.

  • Pastoralism: In addition to agriculture, the Bantu expansion included domesticated animals, notably goats and cattle. Cattle, in particular, played a crucial social and economic role, often seen as a symbol of wealth and status within these societies.

Social Structure and Communities:

  • Kinship-Based Societies: Communities were typically organized around kinship groups or clans. These were often hierarchies led by elders or chieftains, with social duties and rights delineated according to age and gender.

  • Settlement Patterns: Bantu-speaking communities often settled in semi-permanent villages. These were usually small, accommodating extended family units, and were sometimes fortified for protection.

Language and Communication: Linguistic studies show that as Bantu-speaking peoples spread, they brought languages that evolved into a variety of dialects and related languages. This linguistic diversity is a testament to the adaptation and integration of Bantu societies across different regions and environments.

Interactions and Trade:

  • Hunter-Gatherer Societies: As Bantu groups moved southward, they interacted with indigenous Khoisan-speaking hunter-gatherer societies. These interactions ranged from trade and cultural exchange to displacement and conflict.

  • Trade Networks: While formal, large-scale trade networks were limited in this period, trade occurred in valuable resources like iron tools and ornaments, pottery, and possibly cattle.

Religious and Spiritual Beliefs: Religious practices during this period were predominantly animistic, with a focus on ancestors and spirits influencing the natural world. Rituals and ceremonies were integral to maintaining social cohesion and environmental balance, often conducted by shamans or spiritual leaders.

Archaeological Evidence: Sites across Southern Africa such as Mapungubwe would later offer insight into these early societies. Logistical data derived from pottery styles, settlement ruins, and iron implements found in these locations provide critical archaeological evidence of the life ways and technological advancement of Bantu-speaking communities.

In summary, around 2200 years ago, Southern Africa was marked by the significant influence of the Bantu expansion, with these peoples gradually introducing transformative cultural, agricultural, and technological changes. These developments laid important foundations for the future complex societies that would emerge in Southern Africa. The era was characterized by adaptation, innovation, and the blending of cultures that shaped the African continent's historical trajectory.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of KhoesanLeipzigHunter with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Africans 93.1%
Ancient Asians 4.3%
Neolithic Farmers 2.6%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Africa 98.5%
African Hunter-Gatherer 96.6%
African Hunter-Gatherer 96.6%
West African 1.8%
Ghanaian, Liberian, Sierra Leonean 1.8%
Asia 1.2%
Northern Asian 0.9%
Mongolian 0.8%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in South Africa in the Modern era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Mbuti
13.2673
2
Bakola
33.5314
3
Bedzan
34.4196
4
Baka
35.8857
5
Biaka
38.0967
6
Hadza
39.0761
7
Bantu S.E.
40.5106
8
Khomani San
41.8006
9
Bantu S.W.
42.2804
10
Sandawe
42.8363
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Reconstructing Prehistoric African Population Structure

Authors Skoglund P, Thompson JC, Prendergast ME
Abstract

We assembled genome-wide data from 16 prehistoric Africans. We show that the anciently divergent lineage that comprises the primary ancestry of the southern African San had a wider distribution in the past, contributing approximately two-thirds of the ancestry of Malawi hunter-gatherers ∼8,100-2,500 years ago and approximately one-third of the ancestry of Tanzanian hunter-gatherers ∼1,400 years ago. We document how the spread of farmers from western Africa involved complete replacement of local hunter-gatherers in some regions, and we track the spread of herders by showing that the population of a ∼3,100-year-old pastoralist from Tanzania contributed ancestry to people from northeastern to southern Africa, including a ∼1,200-year-old southern African pastoralist. The deepest diversifications of African lineages were complex, involving either repeated gene flow among geographically disparate groups or a lineage more deeply diverging than that of the San contributing more to some western African populations than to others. We finally leverage ancient genomes to document episodes of natural selection in southern African populations. PAPERCLIP.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample KhoesanLeipzigHunter can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

KhoesanLeipzigHunter,-0.6318772,0.05704096,0.0231224,0.02851648,-0.00165144,0.00357528,0.27887552,-0.221288,0.02184208,0.007076,-0.00728744,0.17401328,0.08750592,-0.0014364,0.01188152,-0.00404032,0.00338112,-0.04678624,0.00719864,-0.00521896,0.00720432,0.00362152,-0.00470176,-0.00392976,0.00136999
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27