Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of LIA001002
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Indonesia in the Neolithic era

LIA001002
1250 CE - 1300 CE
Female
Neolithic Proto-Metallic Indonesia
Indonesia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

LIA001002

Date Range

1250 CE - 1300 CE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

M17a

Cultural Period

Neolithic Proto-Metallic Indonesia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Indonesia
Locality East Nusa Tengara. Flores. Liang Bua
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

LIA001002 1250 CE - 1300 CE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Neolithic Proto-Metallic period in Indonesia, particularly within the region of Flores and the Liang Bua cave site, represents a significant phase in Southeast Asian prehistory. This era denotes a transitional phase from the late Neolithic into what is often referred to as the Proto-Metallic period, characterized by the initial incorporation of metal tools amidst continued stone tool use. This period is important for understanding the spread of Austronesian cultures across Southeast Asia and the Pacific.

Geographical Context

Liang Bua is a limestone cave situated on the island of Flores, part of the Lesser Sunda Islands in Indonesia. These islands formed part of the extensive maritime networks utilized by Austronesian peoples. The geography of the region, characterized by rugged landscapes and rich biodiversity, provided both challenges and resources for early human societies.

Temporal Frame

The Neolithic Proto-Metallic period on Flores dates approximately from 3000 BCE to the early centuries CE. This timeframe captures the broad transition from Neolithic ways of life, predominantly characterized by agriculture and polished stone tools, to a proto-metallic culture where the introduction and utilization of metal began to occur.

Cultural and Technological Characteristics

1. Subsistence and Economy:

  • Agriculture: The people of this era practiced horticulture, cultivating taro, yams, bananas, and sugarcane, typical of early Austronesian agricultural systems. Evidence indicates a mixed economy that also relied on foraging.
  • Animal Domestication: Pigs and chickens were likely domesticated, providing essential sources of protein alongside fishing and hunting.
  • Trade Networks: There is evidence of long-distance trade, particularly in obsidian and, later, metal, facilitated by the maritime capabilities of Austronesian peoples.

2. Tool Technology:

  • Stone Tools: Continued use of polished stone tools, such as adzes and pestles, which were essential for daily tasks and agriculture.
  • Proto-Metallic Tools: The initial use of metals, mainly copper and bronze, began during this period. Metal objects were likely prestige items at first before becoming more widespread in utilitarian contexts.

3. Pottery and Artifacts:

  • Pottery became more sophisticated, with decorative motifs and forms that indicate both utilitarian and ritual uses.
  • Artifacts, including shell ornaments and intricately carved wooden items, suggest a complex material culture and aesthetic sensibility.

Social Structure and Settlement Patterns

  • Communal Living: Villages were typically small, with communal longhouses reflective of Austronesian social structures.
  • Hierarchy Development: Increasing complexity in social structures, partly evidenced through burial practices, which exhibit variations in grave goods indicative of social stratification.
  • Settlement Patterns: Many communities were situated near waterways, facilitating fishing and transportation.

Anthropology and Human Evolution

Notably, the Liang Bua site is renowned for the discovery of Homo floresiensis, a distinct hominin species, although it predates the Proto-Metallic period significantly. The interactions, if any, between these hominins and later Austronesian settlers remain an area of scientific inquiry.

Religious and Ritual Practices

  • Animism and Ancestral Worship: Religious beliefs likely centered around animistic practices, with reverence for natural spirits and ancestors.
  • Burial Practices: Funerary customs included extended burials with grave goods, reflecting beliefs in an afterlife and varying social statuses.

Linguistic and Genetic Evidence

  • Austronesian Language: The Proto-Metallic period corresponds with the spread of Austronesian languages, marking a significant linguistic shift in the region.
  • Genetic Studies: Modern genetic studies suggest a complex interplay of indigenous genetic lineages with incoming Austronesian genes, marking significant population movements and interactions during this period.

Conclusion

The Neolithic Proto-Metallic period in Indonesia, especially as represented at Flores and Liang Bua, constitutes a pivotal epoch in the history and prehistory of the region. It documents the first inklings of metallurgical innovation within an Austronesian context, a burgeoning complexity in social and economic structures, and the entrenchment of cultural practices that would influence subsequent generations. The study of this period provides crucial insights into the dynamics of cultural transmission, technological innovation, and social evolution in maritime Southeast Asia.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of LIA001002 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Asians 83.8%
Ancient Oceanians 14.2%
Neolithic Farmers 2.0%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 82.5%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 79.5%
Vietnamese 34.7%
Chinese 33.3%
Indonesian Khmer Thai Myanma 11.5%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 3.0%
Pakistan 3.0%
Oceania 14.7%
Melanesian 14.7%
Papuan 14.7%
Africa 2.8%
North African 1.6%
Egyptian 1.6%
African Hunter-Gatherer 0.7%
African Hunter-Gatherer 0.7%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Indonesia in the Neolithic era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Bajo
5.3572
2
Malay
6.9489
3
Batak
8.1444
4
Vizayan
8.1446
5
Indonesian Bali
8.2839
6
Cambodian
8.2975
7
Nyah Kur
8.6591
8
Thai
8.6656
9
Lebbo
8.7789
10
Khmer
8.9407
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Ancient genomes from the last three millennia support multiple human dispersals into Wallacea

Authors Oliveira S, Nägele K, Carlhoff S
Abstract

Previous research indicates that human genetic diversity in Wallacea-islands in present-day Eastern Indonesia and Timor-Leste that were never part of the Sunda or Sahul continental shelves-has been shaped by complex interactions between migrating Austronesian farmers and indigenous hunter-gatherer communities. Yet, inferences based on present-day groups proved insufficient to disentangle this region's demographic movements and admixture timings. Here, we investigate the spatio-temporal patterns of variation in Wallacea based on genome-wide data from 16 ancient individuals (2600-250 years BP) from the North Moluccas, Sulawesi and East Nusa Tenggara. While ancestry in the northern islands primarily reflects contact between Austronesian- and Papuan-related groups, ancestry in the southern islands reveals additional contributions from Mainland Southeast Asia that seem to predate the arrival of Austronesians. Admixture time estimates further support multiple and/or continuous admixture involving Papuan- and Asian-related groups throughout Wallacea. Our results clarify previously debated times of admixture and suggest that the Neolithic dispersals into Island Southeast Asia are associated with the spread of multiple genetic ancestries.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample LIA001002 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

LIA001002,0.00465684,-0.3960295,-0.08361794,-0.0056408,0.13574674,-0.00129122,-0.00303952,-0.00587734,-0.01863142,-0.01510976,0.03813372,0.00511988,-0.0040235,-0.0014211,0.00679248,-0.0005775,-0.0028321,-0.00102734,-0.0003991,-0.00559876,0.00132208,-0.00261568,-0.00073868,-0.00053626,0.00141848
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27