Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of TU916(SX30)
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in France in the Middle Neolithic era

TU916(SX30)
4789 BCE - 4616 BCE
Female
Middle Neolithic Lingolsheim, Alsace, France
France
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

TU916(SX30)

Date Range

4789 BCE - 4616 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

U8b1b1

Cultural Period

Middle Neolithic Lingolsheim, Alsace, France

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country France
Locality Alsace. Lingolsheim
Coordinates 48.5545, 7.6817
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

TU916(SX30) 4789 BCE - 4616 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Middle Neolithic period, particularly in regions like Lingolsheim in Alsace, France, is a fascinating era in the context of Western European prehistory. This period, approximately dating from 4000 to 3000 BCE, marks significant developments in the lifestyles and cultures of Neolithic communities. Here’s an extensive overview of the social, economic, and environmental aspects of this era, with a focus on the Lingolsheim site and the broader Alsatian context.

Geographical and Environmental Context

Alsace is located in the northeastern part of France, bordered by the Rhine River to the east. During the Middle Neolithic, the region would have been a patchwork of forested areas and open fields, with a climate that was quite hospitable for both agriculture and settlement. The fertile lands around the Rhine and its tributaries made this an attractive area for Neolithic communities, which were primarily agrarian.

Archaeological Background

The Lingolsheim site, along with others in Alsace, offers insights into the Linear Pottery Culture (LPC) and its evolution during the Middle Neolithic. The archaeology of the area reveals typical features such as longhouses, various pottery styles, and evidence of well-developed agricultural practices. These societies were part of a broader wave of Neolithic expansion and transformation across Europe.

Societal Structure

  1. Settlement Patterns: The Middle Neolithic communities in Lingolsheim typically lived in small to medium-sized villages composed of several large timber longhouses. These structures served both as domestic spaces and possibly as communal gathering areas. The layout of these settlements indicates a well-organized societal structure with clearly designated areas for living, working, and possibly ritual activities.

  2. Social Organization: Evidence suggests that these communities were largely egalitarian, with little differentiation in grave goods or housing size, indicative of a relatively equal distribution of resources and social standing among community members. However, as time progressed, there may have been the emergence of more complex social hierarchies as populations grew and resources became more centralized.

Economic Practices

  1. Agriculture and Animal Husbandry: The Lingolsheim communities practiced mixed farming, which included the cultivation of cereals like wheat and barley, alongside legumes and other crops. Animal husbandry was also central to their economy, with cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats being the primary domestic animals, providing meat, milk, and secondary products like wool and leather.

  2. Crafts and Trade: Pottery from this period indicates a developed craft tradition, with locally produced ceramics often decorated with intricate patterns. The presence of non-local materials, such as flint and certain types of pottery, suggests that trade networks were in place, connecting Lingolsheim with other Neolithic communities across Europe.

Cultural Aspects

  1. Material Culture and Artifacts: The archaeological record at Lingolsheim includes a variety of tools made from flint, bone, and antler, demonstrating advanced techniques in tool-making and resource utilization. Pottery styles were not only utilitarian but also served as a medium for artistic expression, reflecting both functional and aesthetic considerations.

  2. Ritual and Belief Systems: Although specific details of Middle Neolithic belief systems are sparse, burial practices provide some insight. Burials often included grave goods, suggesting beliefs in an afterlife or the importance of the deceased in the community. Ritual activities likely played a significant role in reinforcing community cohesion and shared identities.

Challenges and Adaptations

The communities at Lingolsheim, like other Middle Neolithic societies, faced various challenges including environmental changes and resource management. Adaptations involved developing more efficient agricultural techniques, diversifying subsistence strategies, and enhancing cooperation both within and between communities to ensure survival and prosperity.

In conclusion, the Middle Neolithic era in Lingolsheim, Alsace, represents a period of significant cultural and economic development. The archaeological evidence paints a picture of adaptive, resourceful communities that were integral to the broader narrative of Neolithic expansion and cultural evolution in Western Europe.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of TU916(SX30) with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Neolithic Farmers 67.3%
European Hunter-Gatherers 17.7%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 12.9%
Ancient Asians 2.1%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Europe 95.1%
Southern European 95.1%
Italian 42.7%
Sardinian 35.2%
Iberian 17.0%
Africa 3.2%
North African 3.2%
Egyptian 3.2%
Oceania 0.9%
Melanesian 0.9%
Papuan 0.9%
Asia 0.7%
Northern West Asian 0.7%
Cypriot 0.7%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in France in the Middle Neolithic era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Sardinian
3.0843
2
French Corsica
6.2613
3
Belmonte Jew
6.7940
4
Italian Lazio
7.4626
5
Italian Umbria
7.6916
6
Italian Lombardy
7.6995
7
Spanish Murcia
7.7687
8
Spanish Menorca
7.8424
9
Spanish Andalucia
7.8582
10
Sicilian West
7.8764
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Comparison of target enrichment strategies for ancient pathogen DNA

Authors Furtwängler A, Neukamm J, Böhme L
Abstract

In ancient DNA research, the degraded nature of the samples generally results in poor yields of highly fragmented DNA; targeted DNA enrichment is thus required to maximize research outcomes. The three commonly used methods - array-based hybridization capture and in-solution capture using either RNA or DNA baits - have different characteristics that may influence the capture efficiency, specificity and reproducibility. Here we compare their performance in enriching pathogen DNA of Mycobacterium leprae and Treponema pallidum from 11 ancient and 19 modern samples. We find that in-solution approaches are the most effective method in ancient and modern samples of both pathogens and that RNA baits usually perform better than DNA baits.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample TU916(SX30) can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

TU916(SX30),0.11265436,0.1601512,0.01541082,-0.0525266,0.0519872,-0.02574474,-0.00295096,0.0045473,0.04165724,0.0655114,-0.00212898,0.01141914,-0.0193948,-0.01297942,-0.0110594,0.00626508,0.01019276,0.0003895,0.00070918,-0.00218892,0.00149204,0.00593356,-0.0125098,-0.01840178,0.00348852
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27