Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of brn003
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Russia in the Neolithic era

brn003
4691 BCE - 4502 BCE
Male
Neolithic Kadalinka River, Russia
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

brn003

Date Range

4691 BCE - 4502 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

D4*

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N1c1a1

Cultural Period

Neolithic Kadalinka River, Russia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Siberian Federal District. Trans-Baikal. Kadalinka River. Dvorcy-Dacha burial
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

brn003 4691 BCE - 4502 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Neolithic era in the region surrounding the Kadalinka River in Siberia represents a fascinating period of transition and adaptation for Siberian hunter-gatherer cultures. This period, broadly dating from approximately 9000 to 3000 BCE, witnessed significant changes in lifestyle, technology, and social dynamics as communities slowly began experimenting with agriculture and permanent settlements while still maintaining many traditional practices.

Geography and Environment

The Kadalinka River, nestled in the expansive terrain of Siberia, provided a rich and diverse ecosystem that influenced the lifestyle of its inhabitants. The river itself, fed by snowmelt and seasonal rains, offered a plentiful supply of fresh water, fish, and other aquatic resources. The surrounding landscape consisted of dense boreal forests, taiga, and open steppe regions, each supporting a variety of flora and fauna. This diverse environment was crucial for a semi-nomadic lifestyle, providing different resources throughout the seasons.

Subsistence and Economy

In the Neolithic Kadalinka River culture, subsistence strategies were notably adaptable and diverse. Although primarily hunter-gatherers, engaging in hunting game such as elk, reindeer, and hare, these communities also exploited rich fishing grounds and foraged for wild plants, berries, and root vegetables.

As the Neolithic progressed, some communities along the river began experimenting with proto-agricultural practices. They domesticated native plants and possibly kept small numbers of domesticated animals like dogs, which assisted in hunting and protection. However, full-scale agriculture was not predominant, and these societies remained largely dependent on traditional foraging and hunting methods.

Tools and Technology

Technological advancements during the Neolithic period included improved stone tool technology. The communities developed a refined toolkit of microliths, flint blades, and ground stone implements, suitable for hunting, processing animal hides, and woodworking. The discovery of pottery shards in some regions indicates the gradual adoption of ceramic technology, primarily used for cooking and storage.

Craftsmanship also extended to bone, antler, and ivory, with artisans creating tools, ornaments, and weapons. The use of sinew, plant fibers, and rawhide for constructing tools and simple structures was also prevalent.

Social Structure and Habitation

Social structures in these Neolithic societies were likely egalitarian, with decisions made communally or by groups of elders. Evidence suggests that these communities operated within small, kin-based groups or bands. Seasonal movements were common, with temporary camps set up along the river or within forested areas, taking advantage of resources as they became available.

Later in the Neolithic period, the establishment of semi-permanent settlements along the Kadalinka River became more common. These would typically consist of a cluster of dwellings made from wood and animal hides, strategically located near water sources and resource-rich areas.

Culture and Rituals

The spiritual and cultural life of these Siberian hunter-gatherers was deeply tied to the natural environment. Animistic beliefs were likely prevalent, with spiritual leaders or shamans playing significant roles in interpreting the natural world, conducting rituals, and healing.

Art and decoration were integral to cultural expression, as evidenced by carvings on bone and antler, petrographs on rock faces, and pottery embellished with simple designs. These artistic endeavors often held ceremonial significance, likely depicting cosmological themes or serving as talismans.

Interaction and Exchange

Contact with neighboring groups facilitated the exchange of ideas, goods, and technologies. Although isolated by modern standards, these communities participated in extensive trade networks that spanned much of Siberia and beyond. They traded items such as flint, obsidian, shells, and crafted ornaments, which have been found far beyond their points of origin.

Conclusion

The Neolithic era along the Kadalinka River illustrates a period of profound adaptability and transformation. While maintaining their deep-rooted dependence on the rich natural environment, the people of this region experimented with new technologies and social structures. This period laid the foundations for further cultural developments in Siberia, even as the era gradually merged into the subsequent Bronze Age.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of brn003 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Asians 100.0%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 91.0%
Northern Asian 91.0%
Mongolian 90.2%
Siberian 0.8%
Africa 9.0%
African Hunter-Gatherer 9.0%
African Hunter-Gatherer 9.0%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in Russia in the Neolithic era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Negidal
5.4983
2
Nanai
6.8554
3
Ulchi
7.3591
4
Evenk
8.1722
5
Yukagir
8.2014
6
Yukagir Tundra
8.2676
7
Oroqen
9.0012
8
Even
9.0273
9
Evenk O
9.5936
10
Nivkh
9.8030
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Human population dynamics and Yersinia pestis in ancient northeast Asia

Authors Kılınç GM, Kashuba N, Koptekin D
Abstract

We present genome-wide data from 40 individuals dating to c.16,900 to 550 years ago in northeast Asia. We describe hitherto unknown gene flow and admixture events in the region, revealing a complex population history. While populations east of Lake Baikal remained relatively stable from the Mesolithic to the Bronze Age, those from Yakutia and west of Lake Baikal witnessed major population transformations, from the Late Upper Paleolithic to the Neolithic, and during the Bronze Age, respectively. We further locate the Asian ancestors of Paleo-Inuits, using direct genetic evidence. Last, we report the most northeastern ancient occurrence of the plague-related bacterium, Yersinia pestis Our findings indicate the highly connected and dynamic nature of northeast Asia populations throughout the Holocene.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample brn003 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

brn003,0.0350916,-0.4390297,0.1111816,-0.03122726,-0.09642056,-0.06207448,0.0268967,0.03327046,0.01738898,0.01855252,0.01629852,0.0053318,-0.00558942,0.00546646,-0.01100238,-0.01843418,-0.00711264,0.01417944,0.0217331,0.01082216,0.02881924,-0.0301502,0.00110938,0.00292622,0.01367004
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26