Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO17
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Norway in the Mesolithic era

NEO17
7589 BCE - 7368 BCE
Male
Mesolithic Norway
Norway
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO17

Date Range

7589 BCE - 7368 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

U4

Y-DNA Haplogroup

I-S6635

Cultural Period

Mesolithic Norway

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Norway
Locality Hummervikholmen (Agder, Søgne nor)
Coordinates 58.0640, 7.7437
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO17 7589 BCE - 7368 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Mesolithic era in Norway, spanning approximately from 9500 to 4000 BCE, marks a significant period of adaptation and development following the last Ice Age, as Scandinavia transitioned from a glacial environment to one more temperate and conducive to human habitation. This era is characterized by the activities of Scandinavian hunter-gatherers who adapted to the changing landscapes and ecosystems.

Environment and Climate

During the Mesolithic period, Norway underwent significant climatic and environmental changes. As the glaciers retreated, new landscapes emerged, creating a rich tapestry of forests, rivers, coastal areas, and fjords. This transformation led to a rise in biodiversity, with lush forests comprising primarily pines and birches, and abundant wildlife, including elk, reindeer, beavers, and various bird species, which provided ample resources for human sustenance.

The coastlines of Norway became increasingly accessible and fertile, fostering marine ecosystems teeming with fish, seals, and whales. These resources were crucial for the hunter-gatherer societies that gradually moved northwards following the retreating ice.

Lifestyle and Subsistence

Mesolithic societies in Norway were primarily hunter-gatherers who developed a highly adaptive subsistence strategy to exploit the diverse environments they inhabited. The coastal areas became important centers for fishing, sealing, and gathering shellfish, while inland groups focused on hunting land mammals and gathering plant resources.

Seasonal movement was essential for survival, as groups traveled between coastal and inland sites to exploit different resources throughout the year. In summer, groups would congregate at coastal sites to fish and hunt marine mammals, while winter would see a dispersion into smaller family units that moved inland to hunt terrestrial game.

Tools and Technology

Mesolithic Norwegians are noted for their advanced tool-making abilities, particularly their use of microliths—small, flaked stone tools that were typically set in wooden or bone handles for use as arrows or spears. These tools represented a significant leap in efficiency and versatility compared to earlier Paleolithic implements.

Aside from microliths, Mesolithic tool kits included scrapers, burins, and axes made from flint, quartz, and other locally available stones. The use of bone, antler, and wood was also common, with remains suggesting the crafting of fishing gear such as hooks, harpoons, and nets, which were essential for exploiting marine resources.

Social Organization and Culture

The social structure of Mesolithic Norway likely consisted of small, kin-based groups with fluid territories defined by resource availability rather than strict borders. This social organization facilitated cooperation in resource-rich areas and allowed for flexibility when resources became scarce.

Evidence from archaeological sites indicates some degree of ritual and symbolic behavior. Personal ornaments like pendants made from animal teeth and bones suggest the presence of social differentiation or status, as well as possible belief systems or spiritual practices tied to nature and animal life.

Camps and settlements in this period were often temporary, reflecting the nomadic lifestyle of the people. However, some sites, such as those near rich fishing grounds, may have been used repeatedly over many generations, hinting at the beginnings of more complex settlement patterns.

Archaeological Discoveries

Norway's Mesolithic sites, such as those found in the coastal regions and around the Oslofjord, have provided significant insights into the lives of these early Scandinavians. Excavations have uncovered the remains of dwellings, tools, and food debris, giving a detailed picture of daily life and subsistence.

Notable sites include the settlement at Slettnes, which has provided evidence of long-term occupation and varied subsistence strategies, and the Fosna culture sites, named after Fosna in Møre og Romsdal, which have been pivotal in understanding the migration patterns and technological innovations of the time.

Conclusion

The Mesolithic era in Norway is a testament to the resilience and adaptability of early Scandinavian populations. As a period of transition and innovation, it laid the foundation for subsequent Neolithic cultures, characterized by the introduction of farming and more permanent settlement patterns. Understanding Mesolithic Norway offers valuable insights into human adaptation to climatic and environmental changes, a subject as relevant today as it was millennia ago.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26