Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO521
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Ukraine in the Neolithic era

NEO521
7032 BCE - 6645 BCE
Female
Dnieper Neolithic Culture
Ukraine
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO521

Date Range

7032 BCE - 6645 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

U5b2b

Cultural Period

Dnieper Neolithic Culture

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Ukraine
Locality Igren'-8 (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Dnipro District, Dnipro municipality)
Coordinates 48.4436, 35.1159
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO521 7032 BCE - 6645 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Dnieper Neolithic Culture, associated with the early Proto-Slavic peoples, represents a fascinating and complex era in prehistoric Europe. This culture flourished approximately between 5,000 and 2,000 BCE in the region surrounding the Dnieper River, primarily in what is today Ukraine and parts of Belarus. It played a significant role in the development of later Slavic cultures and is crucial in understanding the societal and technological evolutions of the prehistoric Eastern European populations.

Geographical Context

The Dnieper Neolithic Culture occupied a region characterized by a diverse landscape, including river valleys, forests, and steppes. The Dnieper River itself was a major geographical feature that provided a corridor for migration, trade, and cultural exchange. The fertile lands and access to fresh water made this area ideal for early agricultural endeavors, while the extensive river system facilitated communication and interaction with neighboring cultures.

Economy and Subsistence

The economy of the Dnieper Neolithic Culture was predominantly based on a mixture of hunting, gathering, agriculture, and fishing. Archaeological evidence suggests the use of primitive agrarian techniques, with early forms of cultivation of grains such as barley and wheat. The domestication of animals, including cattle, pigs, and sheep, provided a reliable source of meat, milk, and hides.

Fishing played a significant role in the subsistence strategies, given the proximity to the Dnieper River and its tributaries. Tools recovered from archaeological sites, such as fishhooks and nets, indicate a sophisticated understanding of aquatic resources.

Settlement Patterns

Settlements of the Dnieper Neolithic Culture were typically small, semi-permanent villages located along riverbanks or on elevated terraces. These settlements were composed of rudimentary dwellings, including pit-houses and simple structures made from wood and clay. The choice of locations reflected a balance between access to resources and protection from environmental challenges.

Material Culture and Technology

The material culture of the Dnieper Neolithic peoples is characterized by a variety of stone tools, pottery, and early metallurgical practices. Flint and bone were commonly used materials for making tools such as scrapers, arrowheads, and knives. Pottery from this era displays a range of simple decorative techniques, including incised geometric patterns and cord impressions.

One of the significant technological advancements of this culture was the gradual transition from the use of stone to metal. This period saw the beginnings of copper metallurgy, setting the foundation for more advanced metalworking techniques in subsequent cultures.

Social Structure and Organization

The social structure of the Dnieper Neolithic communities is not fully understood due to the limited archaeological evidence. However, it is believed that they were organized into small, kin-based groups with a relatively egalitarian social order. Leadership roles might have been based on age, experience, or specialized knowledge, particularly in matters of trade and resource management.

Rituals and Beliefs

Evidence of ritualistic practices suggests that the Dnieper Neolithic Culture had a complex spiritual life. Burial sites reveal varied mortuary practices, including inhumation and cremation, accompanied by grave goods such as pottery, tools, and ornaments. These rituals indicate a belief in an afterlife and the importance of the deceased in communal memory.

Interaction and Influence

The Dnieper Neolithic Culture was not isolated; it engaged in active interaction with neighboring cultures. Trade networks facilitated the exchange of goods, such as flint, amber, and metal objects, and ideas, contributing to technological and cultural innovations.

Legacy and Impact

The Dnieper Neolithic Culture is considered a precursor to the more developed Bronze Age cultures in the region and laid the groundwork for the later emergence of the Slavic tribes. As such, it holds a critical place in the study of Proto-Slavic history and the broader narrative of European prehistoric cultures.

In summary, the Dnieper Neolithic Culture represents a significant era in early European history. Its contributions to the development of agriculture, societal organization, and technological innovation underscore its role as a foundational culture in the proto-Slavic lineage. Understanding this culture provides insights into the broader patterns of human adaptation and cultural evolution in the Neolithic period.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26