Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO687
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Russia in the Neolithic era

NEO687
3893 BCE - 3634 BCE
Male
Northern Ural Neolithic Culture
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO687

Date Range

3893 BCE - 3634 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

U5a1d2

Y-DNA Haplogroup

R-YP4141

Cultural Period

Northern Ural Neolithic Culture

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Kumyshanskaya Cave (Sverdlovsk Oblast, Shalinsky District)
Coordinates 57.5800, 58.2000
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO687 3893 BCE - 3634 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Northern Ural Neolithic Culture of the Forest Neolithic period represents a fascinating chapter in the prehistory of the Northern Ural region, characterized by its adaptation to the forested landscapes and resource-rich environments. This period, which broadly spans from approximately 6000 BCE to 2000 BCE, witnessed significant developments in terms of technology, subsistence strategies, and social organization among the communities inhabiting these regions.

Geographic and Environmental Context

The Northern Ural regions boast a diverse and challenging landscape, characterized by dense forests, rolling hills, river systems, and a variety of flora and fauna. This setting provided abundant resources but also demanded adaptations and innovations from the Neolithic communities. The climate during this period was generally cooler and wetter than today, with a gradual warming trend that influenced the availability of resources and the types of species that the inhabitants hunted and foraged.

Subsistence Strategies

The communities of the Northern Ural Neolithic Culture were primarily hunter-gatherers, though evidence suggests a gradual transition towards more sedentary and semi-sedentary lifestyles. They exploited the rich forest resources, including game such as elk, wild boar, and various species of deer. Additionally, fishing played a crucial role in their diet, taking advantage of the numerous rivers and lakes teeming with fish. Foraging for wild plants, berries, nuts, and seeds supplemented their diet, and there is some evidence of early experimentation with plant cultivation.

Technological Developments

One of the hallmarks of the Northern Ural Neolithic Culture was their sophisticated lithic technology. The inhabitants crafted a variety of stone tools, including polished stone axes, arrowheads, spear points, scrapers, and knives, using locally available materials such as flint and chert. The art of tool-making was a highly specialized skill, passed down through generations. Pottery also made its first appearance during this period, with the creation of simple, functional ceramic vessels that were likely used for cooking and storage.

Social and Cultural Aspects

The social structure of the Northern Ural Neolithic communities is believed to have been organized in small, kin-based groups or extended families. These groups were likely egalitarian, with social roles largely determined by age, gender, and skill. The seasonal movements dictated by hunting and gathering cycles could have fostered interactions between different groups, potentially leading to the exchange of goods and cultural practices.

Culturally, these communities engaged in artistic and ritualistic activities, as evidenced by the discovery of carvings, figurines, and rock art. These expressions provide insight into the spiritual and symbolic worldviews of the Neolithic people, possibly reflecting belief systems centered around nature, animals, and the cycle of life. Burial practices also indicate a concern with ritual and an understanding of life's continuity beyond death, with some graves containing grave goods or personal ornaments.

Interaction and Exchange

While relatively isolated, the Northern Ural Neolithic Culture did not exist in complete isolation. Archaeological evidence suggests some level of interaction and exchange with neighboring cultures, both to the west in Eastern Europe and to the east in Siberia. These interactions likely facilitated the diffusion of ideas, technologies, and genes. Long-distance trade routes might have introduced exotic materials and encouraged cultural innovations.

Conclusion

The Northern Ural Neolithic Culture of the Forest Neolithic Period encapsulates a dynamic era of human adaptation and innovation. Inhabitants demonstrated a profound ability to harness the resources of their environment, advancing their technological skills, developing complex social structures, and expressing a rich cultural life. As such, this culture provides critical insights into the broader patterns of human development and migration across the Eurasian landmass during the Neolithic era.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26