Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of ulu117
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Turkey in the Early Bronze Age era

ulu117
4000 BCE - 3000 BCE
Female
Early Bronze Age Ulucak Culture
Turkey
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

ulu117

Date Range

4000 BCE - 3000 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

J1c11

Cultural Period

Early Bronze Age Ulucak Culture

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Turkey
Locality Ulucak Höyük (İzmir, Kemalpaşa)
Coordinates 38.4660, 27.3520
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

ulu117 4000 BCE - 3000 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Early Bronze Age Ulucak Culture represents a pivotal period in the development of ancient Anatolia, present-day Turkey. This culture is part of a broader civilization era that flourished roughly between 3000 and 2000 BCE, although specific dates may vary slightly depending on archaeological findings and interpretations.

Archaeological Overview

Ulucak, first discovered near the modern town of Kemalpaşa in the İzmir Province, plays a crucial role in understanding the transition from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age in Western Anatolia. The site, Ulucak Höyük, is one of the key archaeological sites used to study this culture, providing extensive layers of human occupation indicating continuous development over centuries.

Settlement and Architecture

The Ulucak Culture was characterized by its distinctive settlement patterns. Communities were often established on elevated mounds (höyük), which offered strategic advantages such as defense and visibility across the landscape. The architecture primarily included rectangular, mud-brick dwellings with plastered floors and walls, built around centrally located courtyards. The remains of fortification walls suggest that these communities had a well-developed sense of protection and organization.

Economy and Subsistence

Agriculture formed the backbone of the Ulucak economic system. The cultivation of cereals like wheat and barley, as well as the domestication of animals including sheep, goats, and cattle, were crucial for subsistence. Archaeobotanical records suggest that other plants such as lentils and flax were also grown. This agricultural base was typically supplemented by hunting, allowing for a diverse diet and resilience in the face of environmental changes.

Craftsmanship and Technology

The Early Bronze Age in Anatolia saw significant technological advancements. The Ulucak people were skilled in ceramics, producing ware that was both utilitarian and artistic. Pottery from this period is often characterized by simple forms and decorations, including incised or impressed motifs. The emergence of metalworking, particularly bronze, marks a significant leap in technological capabilities. Although initially limited to small tools and ornaments, it set the foundation for more complex production in later periods.

Trade and Interaction

The Ulucak Culture held a strategic position at the intersection of Europe and Asia, facilitating cultural and material exchange. Evidence suggests interactions with neighboring regions, such as the Aegean and the broader Near East, through trade networks. Such exchanges likely involved pottery, textiles, and possibly metal objects, indicating a degree of complexity and organization in economic activities.

Social Structure and Cultural Practices

While direct evidence of social stratification is limited, the presence of varying grave goods and the complexity of settlements suggest some degree of hierarchical social organization. Burial practices varied, indicating potential differences in social status or roles within the community. Cultural practices likely included communal gatherings and potentially religious or ceremonial activities, though specific details on spirituality and ideology remain speculative due to limited explicit archaeological evidence.

Legacy and Influence

The legacy of the Ulucak Culture is embedded in its contribution to the transition and evolution of societies in Anatolia from the Neolithic towards more complex Bronze Age civilizations. It embodies the adaptation and innovation necessary for developing early urbanization and trade networks, elements that flourished in subsequent Anatolian civilizations.

Conclusion

The Early Bronze Age Ulucak Culture represents a fascinating tapestry of human ingenuity and adaptation. Through their advancements in agriculture, architecture, craftsmanship, and trade, the Ulucak people laid crucial foundations for the development of more complex societies in the region. Their archaeological footprint offers valuable insights into the broader socio-cultural evolutions of the Early Bronze Age in Anatolia, paving the way for the rise of more advanced and influential empires that would later characterize the ancient Near East.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in human mobility patterns in Holocene Southwest Asia and the East Mediterranean

Authors Koptekin D, Yüncü E, Rodríguez-Varela R
Abstract

We present a spatiotemporal picture of human genetic diversity in Anatolia, Iran, Levant, South Caucasus, and the Aegean, a broad region that experienced the earliest Neolithic transition and the emergence of complex hierarchical societies. Combining 35 new ancient shotgun genomes with 382 ancient and 23 present-day published genomes, we found that genetic diversity within each region steadily increased through the Holocene. We further observed that the inferred sources of gene flow shifted in time. In the first half of the Holocene, Southwest Asian and the East Mediterranean populations homogenized among themselves. Starting with the Bronze Age, however, regional populations diverged from each other, most likely driven by gene flow from external sources, which we term "the expanding mobility model." Interestingly, this increase in inter-regional divergence can be captured by outgroup-f3-based genetic distances, but not by the commonly used FST statistic, due to the sensitivity of FST, but not outgroup-f3, to within-population diversity. Finally, we report a temporal trend of increasing male bias in admixture events through the Holocene.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27