Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I12958
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Mongolia in the Middle Late Bronze Age era

I12958
1615 BCE - 1452 BCE
Female
Middle Bronze Age Munkhkhairkhan 3, Mongolia
Mongolia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I12958

Date Range

1615 BCE - 1452 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

G2a1

Cultural Period

Middle Bronze Age Munkhkhairkhan 3, Mongolia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Mongolia
Locality Khovd. Munkhkhairkhan sum. Ulaan goviin uzuur kurgan 1
Coordinates 47.0690, 91.8300
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I12958 1615 BCE - 1452 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Middle Bronze Age represents a fascinating period in the history of the Eurasian Steppe, particularly in the region now known as modern-day Mongolia. The designation \Munkhkhairkhan 3" typically refers to a specific archaeological site or cultural phase within this era. Understanding the Middle Bronze Age in this context involves examining the intricate interplay of environment, technology, society, and trade that defined the period.

Geography and Environment

Munkhkhairkhan is situated in the rugged and diverse terrain of Mongolia, characterized by vast steppes, mountain ranges, and sparse river systems. This geography played a significant role in shaping the cultures of the Middle Bronze Age. The region's climate during this period was likely variable, with fluctuations between arid and more temperate conditions. Such environmental factors influenced the lifestyle, subsistence patterns, and movements of the Bronze Age communities.

Socio-Cultural Dynamics

Societies during the Middle Bronze Age in Mongolia were typically nomadic or semi-nomadic, relying on pastoralism as their primary means of subsistence. The domestication of horses, which occurred around this time or slightly earlier, was a transformative development, providing increased mobility and facilitating the spread of cultures and ideas across vast distances.

Communities were often organized along tribal lines, with social structures that could be both hierarchical and fluid. These societies displayed intricate kinship patterns and clan networks, which were critical in maintaining social cohesion and cooperation among dispersed groups.

Material Culture and Technology

The material culture of the Middle Bronze Age in the Munkhkhairkhan region is emblematic of broader trends across the Eurasian Steppe. Artifacts from this era reveal a sophisticated understanding of metallurgy, with communities producing bronze tools, weapons, and ornaments. The use of bronze represented a significant technological advancement, allowing for improvements in agricultural practices, warfare, and craftsmanship.

Pottery from this period often exhibits unique stylistic elements, suggesting an aesthetic appreciation as well as functionality. Designs could include geometric patterns or animal motifs, reflecting both local traditions and cross-cultural interactions.

Trade and Interaction

The Middle Bronze Age was a time of significant exchange and interaction across the Eurasian Steppe, facilitated by the region's role as a nexus of cultural and trade pathways. This period saw the movement of goods, technologies, and ideas between distant societies, including those of Central Asia, Mesopotamia, and possibly even regions further afield.

Trade networks likely included the exchange of metals, textiles, livestock, and other commodities, contributing to the prosperity and cultural development of communities within the Munkhkhairkhan area. These interactions fostered a multicultural mosaic, with influences seen in weapon technology, art, and social customs.

Ritual and Belief Systems

Religious and spiritual life in the Middle Bronze Age was closely tied to the natural environment, with rituals and beliefs reflecting a deep connection to the land and its cycles. Archaeological evidence points to the existence of burial mounds (kurgans) and other ceremonial sites, indicating complex funerary practices and a belief in an afterlife or spiritual realm.

Artifacts unearthed from these sites, such as figurines, engraved stones, and other ritual objects, suggest a pantheon of spirits or deities, possibly linked to animal totems or ancestral worship.

Conclusion

Munkhkhairkhan 3, as a representation of the Middle Bronze Age in Mongolia, offers a window into the dynamic and interconnected world of the Eurasian Steppe. This period was marked by technological innovation, vibrant trade, and rich cultural exchanges that would lay the foundations for future developments in the region. Through ongoing archaeological research, we continue to gain deeper insights into the lives of the people who once thrived in this challenging and majestic landscape."

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I12958 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Asians 72.1%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 15.4%
Neolithic Farmers 6.6%
Ancient Native Americans 5.9%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 89.8%
Northern Asian 49.0%
Siberian 40.4%
Mongolian 8.6%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 31.0%
Central Asian 31.0%
Japanese & Korean 7.0%
Japanese 7.0%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 2.8%
Chinese 1.6%
Tibetan 1.2%
America 7.6%
America 7.6%
Native American 7.6%
Europe 2.1%
Eastern European 2.1%
Eastern European 2.1%
Africa 0.6%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Mongolia in the Middle Late Bronze Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Tubalar
6.3069
2
Altaian Kizhi O
6.3518
3
Tatar Siberian
6.6446
4
Tatar Siberian Zabolotniye
6.8903
5
Shor Mountain
7.4743
6
Shor Khakassia
7.4803
7
Shor
7.5952
8
Karakalpak
7.7436
9
Nogai
7.9599
10
Teleut
8.3242
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I12958 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I12958,0.07803616,-0.1918002,0.07633376,0.03462248,-0.02729142,-0.0135625,-0.00445278,-0.00291942,6.69E-05,-0.01290866,0.00997578,-0.004642,0.01277062,-0.02023692,-0.01012734,-0.00949154,-0.011339,0.0019746,0.00485088,0.00379396,-0.00726918,0.00080466,0.0120018,-0.00827766,-0.00056633
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27