Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I1657
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Armenia in the Early Bronze Age era

I1657
3339 BCE - 3012 BCE
Female
Early Bronze Age Armenia
Armenia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I1657

Date Range

3339 BCE - 3012 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

U3a2a

Cultural Period

Early Bronze Age Armenia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Armenia
Locality Talin cemetery
Coordinates 40.3908, 43.8911
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I1657 3339 BCE - 3012 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Early Bronze Age in Armenia, roughly spanning from 3300 to 2000 BCE, represents a significant period in the history of the ancient Near East. This era marks the transition from the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods into a more complex and organized societal structure characterized by advancements in metallurgy, agriculture, architecture, and trade. The cultural and historical significance of this period is demonstrated through archaeological findings, which provide insights into the lifestyles, technologies, and social complexities of Early Bronze Age Armenians.

Geography and Environment

Situated in the Armenian Highlands, modern-day Armenia during the Early Bronze Age was a region rich in natural resources such as obsidian, copper, and fertile lands. It was a crossroads connecting different cultures and civilizations of the Near East, including the civilizations of Mesopotamia, Anatolia, and the Iranian plateau. The rugged terrain and river systems, like the Euphrates and Arax, played a crucial role in shaping the development and interaction of these societies.

Societal Structure

The Early Bronze Age saw the emergence of more complex social hierarchies in Armenia. Societies were likely organized into tribal or clan-based systems with chiefs or leading figures who held significant authority. The construction of fortified settlements, such as those found at Shengavit and Metsamor, suggests a need for defense and possibly reflects growing social stratification and competition over resources.

Economy and Trade

The economy of Early Bronze Age Armenia was predominantly agrarian, with farming and animal husbandry being the mainstay of sustenance. The cultivation of cereals, legumes, and the domestication of animals like sheep, goats, and cattle were integral to their subsistence. The region’s wealth in metal resources, particularly copper, led to significant advancements in metallurgy. Armenian artisans produced tools, weapons, and ornaments, which became valuable trade commodities.

Trade networks were extensive, connecting Armenia with distant regions. These networks facilitated the exchange of goods, ideas, and technologies. Armenian obsidian, known for its high quality, was a sought-after material and has been found at archaeological sites as far as the Levant and Mesopotamia.

Technological and Artistic Developments

The Early Bronze Age in Armenia was notable for its technological advancements, especially in metallurgy. The development of copper smelting led to the creation of bronze through the alloying of copper with tin, revolutionizing tool and weapon manufacturing. This period also saw improvements in pottery, with more sophisticated techniques and designs emerging. Pottery styles often featured intricate geometric patterns and were used for both practical and ceremonial purposes.

Artistically, the Armenians of this period demonstrated significant craftsmanship in jewelry and ornamentation, indicating an appreciation for aesthetic expression and possibly social status. The presence of megalithic structures and petroglyphs also suggests a complex ritual and symbolic culture, with religious or ceremonial significance.

Architecture and Settlements

Settlements during the Early Bronze Age were often strategically located on hills or near water sources, providing both defense and sustenance. These settlements varied in size; some were small villages, while others were larger urban centers. The construction of stone and mud-brick structures, including houses, communal buildings, and defensive walls, indicates advanced architectural practices.

Fortified sites like Shengavit reveal multi-roomed buildings and communal complexes that may have served as administrative or religious centers. The presence of kurgans (burial mounds) and other funerary constructions denotes a developed mortuary practice and suggests beliefs in an afterlife.

Religion and Beliefs

Little is concretely known about the specific religious beliefs of Early Bronze Age Armenians, but archaeological evidence suggests they practiced complex religious and symbolic rituals. Burial practices provide insight into their beliefs, with grave goods accompanying individuals in death, perhaps to ensure a safe passage or status in the afterlife. The placement of artifacts and the construction of kurgans might reflect a spiritual connection with ancestors or deities.

Conclusion

Early Bronze Age Armenia played a vital role in the tapestry of the ancient Near East, serving as a bridge for cultural and technological exchanges. The period was marked by significant advancements in metallurgy, agriculture, trade, and societal organization. Through archaeological findings, we gain insight into a resilient and innovative people who laid the groundwork for subsequent cultures in the region. Their legacy is etched into the landscapes of the Armenian Highlands, offering a glimpse into the life and achievements of this ancient civilization.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I1657 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Neolithic Farmers 69.9%
European Hunter-Gatherers 17.3%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 10.4%
Ancient Asians 2.4%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 85.5%
Northern West Asian 73.4%
Caucasian 30.6%
Mesopotamian 27.1%
Anatolian 10.7%
Cypriot 5.0%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 11.6%
Levantine 8.4%
Arabian 3.1%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 0.5%
Indian 0.5%
Europe 14.5%
Southern European 14.5%
Italian 12.4%
Sardinian 2.1%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Armenia in the Early Bronze Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Georgian Kart
2.0200
2
Andian A
2.2159
3
Ahiska
2.2627
4
Georgian Kakh
2.5492
5
Turkish Erzurum
2.6613
6
Georgian Lechkhumi
2.8922
7
Georgian Northeast
2.9678
8
Abkhasian
3.0892
9
Udi
3.1853
10
Azerbaijani Republic Shaki
3.1932
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

The genetic history of the Southern Arc: A bridge between West Asia and Europe | Science

Authors Lazaridis I, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Acar A
Abstract

The period from the Copper Age to the Bronze Age marked major social and economic transformations in West Eurasia. To better understand these changes and their genetic impacts, we generated genome-wide data from 727 individuals who lived between 5000 and 1000 BCE in southeastern Europe and southwestern Asia.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I1657 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I1657,0.10534646,0.11650888,-0.05565784,-0.04319508,-0.03936048,-0.0096177,0.00719886,-0.00479474,-0.0456867,-0.01895344,-0.00312258,0.00674184,-0.01110824,0.00636838,0.00384524,-0.01474846,0.00361798,-0.00404028,-0.00367258,0.00723788,0.00892994,0.00077374,0.00674542,-0.0063296,-0.00087487
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26