Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I18160
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Armenia in the Late Iron Age era

I18160
680 BCE - 550 BCE
Female
Late Iron Age Armenia
Armenia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I18160

Date Range

680 BCE - 550 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

H13a2b4

Cultural Period

Late Iron Age Armenia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Armenia
Locality Harjis cemetery
Coordinates 39.4344, 46.2250
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I18160 680 BCE - 550 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Late Iron Age in Armenia, a period that roughly spans the 9th to 6th centuries BCE, represents a fascinating chapter in the ancient Near Eastern civilization characterized by the emergence, growth, and transformation of socio-political entities within a complex cultural and geopolitical landscape.

Geographical Context

Armenia during the Late Iron Age occupied a strategic position at the crossroads of several major civilizations, including the Assyrian, Persian, and later the Hellenistic empires. This region is characterized by its mountainous terrain, with the Armenian Highlands providing a natural fortress that shaped its cultural and political history. Fertile valleys like the Ararat Plain and the proximity to significant waterways like the Tigris and Euphrates allowed for prosperous agriculture and trade.

Socio-political Structure

The Late Iron Age in Armenia is most notably marked by the rise of the Kingdom of Urartu, a conglomeration of earlier tribal or regional kingdoms. The Urartians, often contemporaneous and rivals with the Assyrians, forged a powerful state that managed to exert control over a considerable portion of what is now eastern Turkey, northwestern Iran, and the Southern Caucasus region.

Urartu’s political system was a centralized monarchy with a strong hierarchical structure. The king, regarded as a divine or semi-divine figure, wielded considerable power and was responsible for leading military campaigns, overseeing religious ceremonies, and commissioning architectural projects. The government was supported by a sophisticated bureaucracy that included provincial governors and a class of scribes who maintained communication and records in cuneiform script.

Economy and Trade

The economy of Late Iron Age Armenia was primarily agrarian but underpinned by complex trade networks. Agricultural output included grains, grapes, and other staple crops, supplemented by livestock farming. The Urartians were skilled in water management, building extensive irrigation systems and artificial canals to improve agricultural productivity.

Trade was facilitated via the extensive road networks and Urartu’s control of key trade routes. The kingdom exchanged goods such as metals, ceramics, textiles, and wine with neighboring regions, contributing to its wealth and facilitating cultural exchanges. Craftsmanship was highly advanced, and Urartian metalwork, particularly in bronze and iron, was renowned for its intricacy and quality.

Religion and Culture

Urartian religion was polytheistic, with a pantheon of gods headed by the supreme deity, Khaldi. Temples and religious complexes were central to cities and fortified sites, serving as both places of worship and economic centers. Rituals likely involved offerings and possibly sacrificial practices aimed at securing divine favor.

The culture was a fusion of indigenous traditions with influences from neighboring civilizations, notably the Assyrians and Hittites. This is reflected in their art and architecture, characterized by monumental stone structures, decorated pottery, and intricate metalwork. Fortresses and cities were carefully planned with impressive defenses, palaces, and public buildings, often adorned with rich carvings and inscriptions.

Architectural and Artistic Achievements

Urartian architecture was notable for its use of massive stone blocks and sophisticated construction techniques. Fortresses such as Erebuni, Karmir Blur, and Toprakkale exemplify advanced urban planning. These sites feature citadels with massive walls, platforms, and towers, reflecting both military needs and royal prestige.

Artistic achievements included bronze statuettes, jewelry, weaponry, and decorated shields. The Urartians excelled in making cauldrons and helmets adorned with figures of gods, mythical creatures, and geometric patterns.

Decline and Legacy

The decline of Late Iron Age Armenia began in the 7th century BCE, coinciding with the expansion of the Assyrian Empire, internal strife, and climatic changes affecting agriculture. By the early 6th century BCE, the emergence of the Median and then the Persian Empire eclipsed Urartu’s power, assimilating its territory and culture into larger imperial frameworks.

Despite its decline, Late Iron Age Armenia had a lasting impact on the region. It laid foundational aspects of Armenian identity, seen in the continuity of cultural elements and language. Furthermore, the Urartian influence persisted, contributing to the development of subsequent Armenian kingdoms, which melded Urartian legacies with new influences, preserving the region's distinct cultural and historic identity.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I18160 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Neolithic Farmers 54.8%
European Hunter-Gatherers 23.4%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 16.9%
Ancient Asians 4.9%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 82.5%
Northern West Asian 62.9%
Caucasian 32.4%
Mesopotamian 30.5%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 14.5%
Levantine 14.5%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 5.2%
Pakistan 2.9%
Indian 2.3%
Europe 17.5%
Northwestern European 9.6%
Northwestern European 7.6%
Scandinavian 2.0%
Southern European 7.9%
Balkan 7.9%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Armenia in the Late Iron Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Tat Azerbaijan
1.5694
2
Azerbaijani Republic Shaki
2.1144
3
Azerbaijani Dagestan
2.3070
4
Azerbaijani Republic Gabala
2.3581
5
Alevi Dersim
2.5641
6
Kurd Kurmanji Turkey
2.8176
7
Andian A
2.8414
8
Tat Dagestan Nyugdi
2.9017
9
Talysh Azerbaijan
2.9441
10
Udi
2.9944
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

The genetic history of the Southern Arc: A bridge between West Asia and Europe | Science

Authors Lazaridis I, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Acar A
Abstract

The period from the Copper Age to the Bronze Age marked major social and economic transformations in West Eurasia. To better understand these changes and their genetic impacts, we generated genome-wide data from 727 individuals who lived between 5000 and 1000 BCE in southeastern Europe and southwestern Asia.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I18160 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I18160,0.09995782,0.1140478,-0.0482005,-0.0239988,-0.03559508,-9.508E-05,0.00708322,-0.00339614,-0.03856296,-0.01896304,-0.0007014,0.00471284,-0.00702696,0.0009194,0.00730172,-0.00123024,-0.0057669,-0.00064496,0.00032596,-0.00045406,0.00273112,-0.00027452,0.00100626,-0.00081338,0.00081954
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27