Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I20228
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Turkey in the Iron Age era

I20228
750 BCE - 480 BCE
Female
Archaic SubGeometric Turkey
Turkey
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I20228

Date Range

750 BCE - 480 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

T2b7a2

Cultural Period

Archaic SubGeometric Turkey

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Turkey
Locality Değirmendere (Aegean. Muğla. Yatağan)
Coordinates 37.3400, 28.0400
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I20228 750 BCE - 480 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Archaic Sub-Geometric period in ancient Anatolia, often contemporaneous with developments in the wider Ancient Greek world, represents a fascinating and complex archaeological and cultural phase. While traditional Greek Archaic Sub-Geometric styles typically dominated regions in Greece, the application and influence of these styles in ancient Turkey, particularly in areas with significant Greek settlements, offer insights into how cultural exchanges manifested in Anatolia during the early first millennium BCE.

Context and Timeline:

  1. Timeline:

    • The Archaic Sub-Geometric period roughly spans the 9th to the 8th centuries BCE. This era succeeds the Late Bronze Age collapse, which significantly transformed the Mediterranean and Near Eastern cultural landscapes.
  2. Cultural Setting:

    • Following the destruction and decline of the major Bronze Age civilizations, such as the Hittites, the region saw the establishment of new social and political entities, including Greek colonies and indigenous Anatolian cultures, resulting in a complex interplay of influences.

Characteristics:

  1. Ceramics and Pottery:

    • The Archaic Sub-Geometric style in pottery often exhibited more stylized and less intricate designs than previous geometric patterns. These designs typically involved linear motifs, including meanders, chevrons, and swastikas, arranged in bands around vases and amphorae.
    • The pottery of this period in Anatolia often suggests a synthesis of Greek and local styles, reflecting a process of adaptation and adoption in areas such as Ionia and Aeolis, where Greek settlers and indigenous Anatolian peoples interacted closely.
  2. Architecture and Urban Development:

    • Settlements during this period often show signs of urban planning influenced by emerging Greek urbanization.
    • The use of megaron-style buildings, characterized by a rectangular hall with an entrance at one end and flanked by columns, is noted.
  3. Trade and Interaction:

    • The Archaic Sub-Geometric period in Anatolia saw the increase of trade and cultural exchange as Greek colonies established in the region became major centers for commerce and cultural interaction.
    • Artifacts and influences from Phoenician, Neo-Hittite, and other Anatolian cultures are often found alongside Greek artifacts, indicating the vibrant exchange of ideas and goods.
  4. Art and Sculpture:

    • While monumental sculpture typical of the Classical period did not dominate this era, smaller artistic expressions such as figurines, seals, and jewelry show a blend of influences.
    • The artwork often involves simplified human and animal forms, echoing the geometric traditions but also hinting at more naturalistic trends that would develop later.
  5. Religious and Social Structures:

    • Religion continued to play a central role in society, with the pantheon reflecting a blend of Greek deities and local gods.
    • Social structures began to evolve, with the emergence of distinct roles and possibly proto-city-state formations indicative of a move towards more organized political structures.

Influence and Legacy:

  1. Cultural Synthesis:

    • The Archaic Sub-Geometric period in ancient Anatolia is particularly notable for its role in fostering a synthesis of Greek and Anatolian cultures, which laid the groundwork for the more distinct Hellenistic culture that would emerge later.
  2. Innovation and Experimentation:

    • The period is marked not only by adherence to older geometric traditions but also by experimentation and the subtle shifts in artistic expression which would influence the subsequent Orientalizing period in Greek art.
  3. Foundation for the Classical Era:

    • The interplay of cultural influences and the gradual changes in artistic and architectural practices during the Archaic Sub-Geometric era set the stage for the developments of the Archaic and Classical periods in both Greece and Anatolia.

In conclusion, while the Archaic Sub-Geometric period in Turkey may not be as prominently recognized as its Greek counterpart, it nonetheless represents a critical phase of cultural development and adaptation, showcasing the rich tapestry of human interaction and creativity that has characterized the ancient Mediterranean world.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I20228 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Neolithic Farmers 73.1%
European Hunter-Gatherers 18.4%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 6.4%
Ancient Native Americans 2.1%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Europe 50.2%
Southern European 50.2%
Italian 33.1%
Balkan 9.1%
Sardinian 8.1%
Asia 47.6%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 26.9%
Levantine 26.9%
Northern West Asian 20.7%
Mesopotamian 17.3%
Cypriot 2.1%
Anatolian 1.3%
Africa 1.2%
North African 1.2%
North African 1.2%
Oceania 1.0%
Melanesian 1.0%
Papuan 1.0%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Turkey in the Iron Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Romaniote Jew
1.9444
2
Turkish Jew
2.0892
3
Ashkenazi France
2.1426
4
Greek Dodecanese
2.2154
5
Italian Jew
2.2247
6
Greek Dodecanese Rhodes
2.2522
7
Ashkenazi Germany
2.2930
8
Greek Kos
2.3540
9
Cypriot
2.4336
10
Bulgarian Jew
2.6130
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

The genetic history of the Southern Arc: A bridge between West Asia and Europe | Science

Authors Lazaridis I, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Acar A
Abstract

The period from the Copper Age to the Bronze Age marked major social and economic transformations in West Eurasia. To better understand these changes and their genetic impacts, we generated genome-wide data from 727 individuals who lived between 5000 and 1000 BCE in southeastern Europe and southwestern Asia.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I20228 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I20228,0.0979205,0.146244,-0.02712192,-0.05384404,0.00074644,-0.0199615,-0.00251462,-0.00310786,0.00403086,0.01912976,-0.00025856,0.00129288,-0.00240368,-0.00060202,-0.00362552,0.00187386,-0.0025165,-0.00059614,0.00147538,-0.00035796,0.00120986,0.0027849,-0.00575708,-0.00192938,-0.00052025
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27