Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO110
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Armenia in the Neolithic era

NEO110
5984 BCE - 5742 BCE
Female
Neolithic Armenia
Armenia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO110

Date Range

5984 BCE - 5742 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

T1a

Cultural Period

Neolithic Armenia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Armenia
Locality Aknashen (Armavir Province, Vagharshapat District)
Coordinates 40.1009, 44.2905
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO110 5984 BCE - 5742 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Neolithic period in Armenia, particularly exemplified by sites such as Aknashen, is a fascinating chapter in the tapestry of Ancient Near Eastern civilizations. It marks one of the periods where humanity transitioned from nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyles to more settled agricultural societies, leading to the rise of complex cultures. This era, dating from approximately 6000 to 4500 BCE, is critical in understanding the development of early human societies in the region.

Geographical Context

Armenia is situated at a strategic crossroads between Eastern Anatolia, the South Caucasus, and Northwestern Iran. This positioning makes it a vital area for studying cultural exchanges and technological advancements during the Neolithic. The fertile plains and the presence of major river systems such as the Araxes provided conducive environments for early agricultural practices.

Archaeological Discoveries

The site of Aknashen, along with others like Aratashen, provides rich archaeological insights into early Neolithic life. Excavations have unearthed a variety of artifacts, including pottery, tools, and structural remains that shed light on the lifestyle, economy, and social structure of the time.

  1. Architecture: Evidence suggests that the inhabitants lived in semi-subterranean structures made from mudbrick, indicating a settled lifestyle. These oval-shaped houses often contained several rooms and were used for both domestic living and storage.

  2. Pottery and Artifacts: The presence of pottery is a hallmark of the Neolithic period. In Armenia, pottery was often simple but increasingly showed more complexity in design over time. The tools found, mostly made from obsidian, attest to sophisticated craftsmanship and trade since obsidian is not locally available in all parts of Armenia, indicating long-distance exchange networks.

  3. Subsistence and Agriculture: The agricultural practices in Neolithic Armenia were based on the cultivation of wheat, barley, and legumes, and the domestication of animals such as cattle, sheep, and goats. This transition to agriculture allowed for more stable food supplies and population growth, which subsequently led to more complex societal structures.

Cultural and Social Aspects

The Neolithic era in Armenia was characterized by increasing social complexity, as evidenced by the variety and richness of artifacts found. There seemed to be an emerging social stratification, indicated by the diversity in house sizes and burial practices. Tools and personal ornaments found at various sites suggest a society that valued craftsmanship and had a nuanced understanding of aesthetics.

Technological Advancements

The period saw significant technological advancements, most notably in stone tool technology, particularly in the usage of obsidian to create sharp and durable implements. The development and refinement of pottery techniques also marked an important technological evolution, not just for practical uses but also for ceremonial purposes.

Trade and Interaction

Armenia's location meant that it was well-placed for interactions with neighboring regions. There is evidence to suggest that there was regular exchange not just of goods, but also of ideas. This can be seen in the similarities in pottery styles and tool technologies with those found in regions like Anatolia and the broader Near East.

Religious and Ritualistic Practices

Although less is understood about the specific religious or ritualistic beliefs of Neolithic Armenians, burial practices provide some insight. Burials often accompanied by grave goods suggest a belief in an afterlife or the significance of the deceased's status within the community. Communal activities likely played a significant role in reinforcing group identity and cohesion.

Legacy

The Neolithic culture of Armenia laid down the foundations for subsequent cultural and societal developments. The technological and social advancements of this era contributed to the rise of more complex societies in the Chalcolithic and Bronze Age periods. Moreover, it highlights Armenia's role in the broader context of the Ancient Near East as a hub of cultural and technological innovation.

In conclusion, Neolithic Armenia, as reflected in sites like Aknashen, represents a vital phase in humanity's progression towards civilization. Its exploration helps illuminate the pathways by which early human societies evolved from simple agrarian communities to complex cultural entities, marking a pivotal chapter in the story of human history in the ancient world.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26