Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of brn001
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Russia in the Neolithic era

brn001
5474 BCE - 5312 BCE
Female
Neolithic Kuenga River 1, Russia
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

brn001

Date Range

5474 BCE - 5312 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

A-a1*

Cultural Period

Neolithic Kuenga River 1, Russia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Siberian Federal District. Trans-Baikal. Kuenga River. Izvestkovaja-1 site
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

brn001 5474 BCE - 5312 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Neolithic era along the Kuenga River in Siberia, Russia, represents a fascinating period marked by the transition of human societies from predominantly mobile hunter-gatherer groups to more settled lifestyles with rudimentary forms of agriculture and animal domestication. This transition did not occur uniformly or simultaneously across all regions, and the specific cultural attributes of the Neolithic Kuenga River community reflect the unique environmental and social conditions of this area.

Geography and Environment

The Kuenga River is situated in the Zabaykalsky Krai region of Siberia, known for its harsh climate with long, cold winters and short summers. This region's rich taiga ecosystems provided a diverse range of flora and fauna, supporting a hunter-gatherer lifestyle. The riverine environment offered an abundance of fish, while the surrounding forests and plains were home to game such as deer, elk, and smaller mammals.

Subsistence and Lifestyle

The Siberian Hunter-Gatherers of the Kuenga River during the Neolithic era primarily relied on hunting, fishing, and gathering. Their diet was likely rich in protein and diverse due to the variety of available resources. Seasonal movements were common, with groups traveling to follow migrating herds or to exploit specific seasonal resources, although some semi-permanent settlements may have existed.

With the progression from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic period, there was an incremental adoption of domesticated plants and animals, although this process was slower and more complex in Siberia compared to other regions. The harsh Siberian climate limited the scope of agriculture; however, evidence suggests the introduction of hardy cereal grasses and possibly the domestication of dogs, which would have aided in hunting and sledding.

Tools and Technology

The Neolithic period was marked by significant advancements in tool-making. The Siberian Hunter-Gatherers of the Kuenga River developed specialized tools such as polished stone axes, chisels, and adzes, which were more effective in woodworking and other tasks. Microlithic technology, involving small, sharp stone blades, continued to play a crucial role, especially in hunting implements like arrowheads and spears.

Furthermore, the use of pottery became more widespread during this era. Pottery found in this region often features distinctive styles and patterns, possibly indicating social or clan affiliations. The ceramics likely served functional roles in cooking and food storage but also held cultural significance.

Social Organization and Culture

The social structure of Neolithic groups in the Kuenga River area was likely organized into small, kin-based bands or tribes. Social hierarchies were probably minimal, reflecting egalitarian principles, though some individuals may have emerged as leaders based on their skills or knowledge, particularly in hunting or spiritual matters.

Cultural practices during this time were heavily influenced by animistic beliefs, with a strong emphasis on the spiritual link between people, animals, and the natural environment. Shamans, if present in these communities, would have played a crucial role in mediating these relationships and conducting rituals.

Artistic expressions such as carvings, beadwork, and possibly petroglyphs would have been integral to their culture, serving both aesthetic and communicative purposes. These artworks could indicate social status, clan affiliation, or convey spiritual narratives.

Impact and Legacy

The Neolithic Kuenga River culture represents a critical evolutionary stage in the prehistory of Siberia. By adapting to the challenging climate and diverse ecosystems, these early peoples laid the groundwork for future cultural and technological developments in the region. The gradual shift towards a more settled lifestyle, even if limited in scope, set the stage for subsequent cultural changes among the indigenous peoples of Siberia.

In conclusion, the Neolithic era along the Kuenga River highlights a period of adaptation, innovation, and cultural richness among Siberian Hunter-Gatherers. Despite environmental challenges, these communities thrived by maintaining a deep connection to their natural surroundings, coupled with slow but integral technological and social advancements.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of brn001 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Asians 86.8%
Ancient Africans 5.9%
Neolithic Farmers 5.0%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 2.3%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 92.0%
Northern Asian 66.6%
Siberian 37.6%
Mongolian 29.1%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 17.2%
Chinese 17.2%
Japanese & Korean 8.1%
Japanese 8.1%
Oceania 4.8%
Melanesian 4.8%
Papuan 4.8%
Africa 2.0%
Congolese & Southern East African 1.1%
South East African 1.1%
West African 0.9%
Ghanaian, Liberian, Sierra Leonean 0.8%
America 1.3%
America 1.3%
Native American 1.3%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Russia in the Neolithic era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Negidal
5.2908
2
Nanai
5.6158
3
Ulchi
5.8529
4
Oroqen
6.8234
5
Khamnegan
7.8102
6
Nivkh
8.0355
7
Evenk O
9.4950
8
Yukagir Tundra
9.8376
9
Buryat
9.9195
10
Yukagir
10.2837
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Human population dynamics and Yersinia pestis in ancient northeast Asia

Authors Kılınç GM, Kashuba N, Koptekin D
Abstract

We present genome-wide data from 40 individuals dating to c.16,900 to 550 years ago in northeast Asia. We describe hitherto unknown gene flow and admixture events in the region, revealing a complex population history. While populations east of Lake Baikal remained relatively stable from the Mesolithic to the Bronze Age, those from Yakutia and west of Lake Baikal witnessed major population transformations, from the Late Upper Paleolithic to the Neolithic, and during the Bronze Age, respectively. We further locate the Asian ancestors of Paleo-Inuits, using direct genetic evidence. Last, we report the most northeastern ancient occurrence of the plague-related bacterium, Yersinia pestis Our findings indicate the highly connected and dynamic nature of northeast Asia populations throughout the Holocene.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample brn001 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

brn001,0.02097282,-0.42452738,0.08948698,-0.0209474,-0.07493494,-0.06945944,0.02437546,0.02491556,0.01266594,0.01545744,0.00598696,0.0038552,-0.00324526,0.00400732,-0.01059694,-0.01628926,-0.00707708,0.01181468,0.01923184,0.00988338,0.02379342,-0.02591654,0.0001895,0.0025485,0.01186731
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26