Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of An individual buried in South Africa in the Iron Age era
Ancient Individual

An individual buried in South Africa in the Iron Age era

A woman buried in South Africa during the South Africa 2000 Years Before Present

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

doo001
343 BCE - 56 BCE
Not known
South Africa
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

doo001

Date Range

343 BCE - 56 BCE

Cultural Period

South Africa 2000 Years Before Present

Biological Sex

Not known

mtDNA Haplogroup

L0d2a1a

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N/A (Female)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country South Africa
Locality Doonside
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

doo001 343 BCE - 56 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Around 2000 years before present (approximately 1 CE), the region of what is now South Africa was experiencing significant changes and developments, particularly with the arrival and spread of Bantu-speaking peoples. While precise details about this era can be sparse due to limited archaeological records, we can construct a broad understanding based on available evidence and scholarly interpretations.

Indigenous Populations:

Before the arrival of the Bantu-speaking peoples, the region was primarily inhabited by Khoisan groups, which include both the Khoikhoi (often referred to as Khoi) and the San (historically referred to as Bushmen). These are believed to be among the original inhabitants of southern Africa, living there for thousands of years.

  1. Lifestyle and Economy:

    • San: The San people were hunter-gatherers, relying on a deep understanding of their environment for survival. They hunted game, foraged for plants, and used tools made from stone, bone, and wood.
    • Khoikhoi: In contrast, the Khoikhoi were primarily pastoralists, herding cattle, sheep, and goats. This more settled lifestyle allowed them to develop different societal structures compared to their hunter-gatherer counterparts.
  2. Social Structure:

    • Both groups were organized in small, mobile communities with social structures characterized by a high degree of egalitarianism. Decision-making was commonly communal, and leadership was often based on experience and skill rather than inheritance.
  3. Cultural Practices:

    • The Khoisan peoples had rich oral traditions and practiced shamanistic beliefs with a strong emphasis on the spiritual connection between people and nature. Rock art from this era depicts religious rituals, hunting scenes, and daily life, reflecting their cosmological views and cultural heritage.

The Arrival of Bantu-speaking Peoples:

Around this time, Bantu-speaking people began migrating into South Africa from the north. This migration was part of a larger Bantu expansion across sub-Saharan Africa.

  1. Origins and Migration:

    • The Bantu migration is believed to have begun in what is today Cameroon or Nigeria, spreading over centuries through sub-Saharan Africa. By 2000 years BP, they started entering the southern region, bringing with them new technologies and societal structures.
  2. Agriculture and Ironworking:

    • Significantly, the Bantu introduced agriculture and ironworking to the region. They cultivated crops such as millet and sorghum, which were well-suited to various climates in southern Africa.
    • The development and adoption of iron tools and weapons revolutionized local economies and societies, allowing communities to clear land more efficiently, cultivate larger areas, and improve their capabilities in crafting and warfare.
  3. Social and Political Structures:

    • Bantu societies were generally more centralized and hierarchical than the indigenous Khoisan groups, often organized into chiefdoms. The presence of chiefs or kings and organized military units marked a shift in political structures.
    • The Bantu clans followed patrilineal systems, with emphasis on lineage and familial ties for social organization and cultural continuity.
  4. Language and Culture:

    • The introduction of Bantu languages significantly influenced the linguistic landscape, leading to the development of a rich tapestry of languages that are still present in South Africa today.
    • Cultural practices, including music, dance, and spiritual beliefs, also spread with the Bantu, contributing to a diverse cultural mosaic in the region.

Interaction and Integration:

The arrival of the Bantu did not lead to the immediate displacement of the Khoisan people. Instead, there was likely a period of interaction, trade, and sometimes conflict.

  1. Trade and Exchange:

    • The Bantu and Khoisan groups engaged in trade, exchanging goods such as livestock and iron implements. This interaction facilitated cultural exchanges that enriched both societies.
  2. Conflict and Assimilation:

    • Social dynamics included both peaceful interactions and conflicts over resources like land and water. Over time, assimilation and intermarriage occurred, contributing to the complex genetic and cultural heritage of modern South African populations.
  3. Environmental Adaptation:

    • The Bantu settlers adapted their agricultural practices to the diverse climates of southern Africa, leading to regional diversity in crops and farming techniques.

In summary, South Africa 2000 years BP was a region of significant cultural and technological transformation. The indigenous Khoisan peoples coexisted with incoming Bantu-speaking communities, leading to profound changes in the region's demographic, cultural, and socio-economic landscape. These developments set the stage for the rich and complex history of southern Africa, evident in the diverse cultures that exist today.

Chapter V

Genetics

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Africa 100.0%
African Hunter-Gatherer 75.8%
African Hunter-Gatherer 75.8%
West African 14.5%
Ghanaian, Liberian, Sierra Leonean 14.5%
Congolese & Southern East African 9.8%
South East African 9.8%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to An individual buried in South Africa in the Iron Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Fulani Guinea
15.1732
2
Senegal Halpularen
15.7587
3
Fulani Burkina Faso Ziniare
16.2570
4
Kikuyu
17.2815
5
Sandawe
18.3010
6
Baggara Arab Chad B
18.3420
7
Senegal Bedik O
18.3423
8
Bulala
18.5448
9
Chad Daza O
18.6810
10
Gambian
18.8919
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
cha001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1504 CE Champagne Castle, South Africa View
ela001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1419 CE Eland Cave, South Africa View
mfo001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1483 CE Mfongosi, South Africa View
new001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1445 CE Newcastle, South Africa View
doo001 South Africa 2000 Years Before Present 343 BCE Doonside, South Africa View
bab001 South Africa 2000 Years Before Present 163 BCE Ballito Bay B, South Africa View
baa001 South Africa 1900 Years Before Present 38 BCE Ballito Bay A, South Africa View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
doo001 South Africa 2000 Years Before Present 343 BCE Doonside, South Africa View
bab001 South Africa 2000 Years Before Present 163 BCE Ballito Bay B, South Africa View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

Southern African ancient genomes estimate modern human divergence to 350,000 to 260,000 years ago

Authors Schlebusch CM, Malmström H, Günther T, Sjödin P, Coutinho A et al.
Abstract

Southern Africa is consistently placed as a potential region for the evolution of Homo sapiens We present genome sequences, up to 13x coverage, from seven ancient individuals from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The remains of three Stone Age hunter-gatherers (about 2000 years old) were genetically similar to current-day southern San groups, and those of four Iron Age farmers (300 to 500 years old) were genetically similar to present-day Bantu-language speakers. We estimate that all modern-day Khoe-San groups have been influenced by 9 to 30% genetic admixture from East Africans/Eurasians. Using traditional and new approaches, we estimate the first modern human population divergence time to between 350,000 and 260,000 years ago. This estimate increases the deepest divergence among modern humans, coinciding with anatomical developments of archaic humans into modern humans, as represented in the local fossil record.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

doo001,-0.4736284,0.01887288,-0.02442194,0.06392144,0.03752988,-0.0824541,-0.00995406,0.01866962,-0.0301112,0.01855018,-0.0026033,0.00082342,0.00509584,-0.00186686,-3.48E-05,-0.00079714,0.00084798,0.01161672,-0.00402478,-0.000549,0.00357416,0.00145308,-0.0025941,0.0014636,-0.00090254
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 25% off Expires Jul 13