A man buried in Estonia in the era

Download PDF creates a visual, rasterized copy. Use Print for selectable text and better assistive-technology support.

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Preparing the available report content...

Your report will open automatically.

Skip to main content
Reference library / Sample profile

A man buried in Estonia in the era

Explore the recorded context, genetic comparisons and research behind this reference sample.

EstoniaThe Neolithic Period

A reference profile describes this sample. It does not establish a personal or family relationship.

AI portrait reconstruction for A man buried in Estonia in the  era
AI-generated artistic reconstruction, not a photograph of the individual.
Record

Sample details

Recorded details and available lineage markers.

Individual

Neolithic individual, Estonia

Sample ID: Kudrukla3

Date Range

3646 BCE - 3376 BCE

Cultural Period

The Neolithic Period

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

Not available

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Social Role

Farmer (AI estimate, era-typical)

Geography

Location

Where this individual was discovered

Country Estonia
Locality Kudruküla. Ida-Viru
Coordinates 59.4500, 28.0800
Chronology

Date range

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

Neolithic individual, Estonia 3646 BCE - 3376 BCE
Context

Historical context

Background information associated with the reference record.

Overview

The Neolithic Period refers to the long transition to food production and more settled lifeways. In many regions, it is characterized by increasing use of domesticated plants and animals, new forms of pottery and stone-working, and the growth of permanent or semi-permanent settlements.

Region & Environment

Neolithic developments occurred in different places and at different speeds, influenced by local climates and ecosystems. Where environments supported reliable rainfall, river valleys, steppe margins, or coastal resources, farming and herding could expand alongside continued hunting and gathering.

Historical Context

The Neolithic is not a single event but a sequence of changes. Communities gradually adopted cultivation practices and managed herds, while exchanging useful materials and knowledge through regional contacts.

Populations & Lifeways

Populations increasingly organized daily life around fields, herding, and domestic production. Settlement patterns often show larger, longer-lasting villages than those typical of earlier foraging societies, with new routines for food processing (grinding, storage, cooking) and for maintaining animals.

Archaeology & Material Culture

Archaeologically, the Neolithic is commonly identified through:

  • Polished or ground stone tools (for woodworking, plant processing, and tasks beyond earlier flaking technologies)
  • Pottery in many regions, useful for cooking and storage
  • Evidence for grinding stones and other food-processing equipment
  • Architectural remains such as house floors and pits, where preserved
  • Faunal and botanical indications of domesticated species

Culture & Society

Social life likely became more structured as households managed land use, storage, and animal husbandry. Greater sedentism and surplus production could support specialist crafts and more complex community networks, though the pace and extent of these changes varied widely.

Legacy & Transition

The Neolithic laid foundations for later agricultural economies and for subsequent phases involving metals and more centralized authorities in some areas. Over time, many regions experienced region-specific transitions rather than uniform “end dates,” blending older traditions with new technologies.

Analysis

Genetic comparisons

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing statistical similarity to modern reference populations from different regions. The excavation site records where this individual was found, not a fixed modern genetic identity.

Europe 91.3%
Northwestern European 56.8%
Finnish 43.4%
Northwestern European 7.9%
Scandinavian 5.5%
Eastern European 34.5%
Eastern European 34.5%
America 7.6%
America 7.6%
Native American 7.6%
Oceania 1.1%
Melanesian 1.1%
Papuan 1.1%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in Estonia in the era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity. Cross-region similarity can reflect shared ancestry, population movement, continuity, or later admixture.

1
Russian Leshukonsky
3.3027
2
Komi A
3.5646
3
Russian Pinezhsky
4.0416
4
Russian Pinega
4.1686
5
Tatar Mishar
4.5071
6
Vepsian
4.7969
7
Russian Krasnoborsky
4.8542
8
Karelian
5.1116
9
Finnish North
5.3372
10
Mordovian
5.3487
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
Proto-Indo-European individual, Estonia Corded Ware Culture, Estonia 2575 BCE Kursi. Jõgeva, Estonia View
Proto-Indo-European individual, Estonia Corded Ware Culture, Estonia 2872 BCE Ardu. Harju, Estonia View
Proto-Indo-European individual, Estonia Corded Ware Culture, Estonia 2872 BCE Ardu. Harju, Estonia View
Proto-Indo-European individual, Estonia Corded Ware Culture, Estonia 2850 BCE Kursi. Jõgeva, Estonia View
Baltic Hunter-Gatherers individual, Estonia Neolithic Comb Ceramic Culture, Estonia 3785 BCE Kudruküla. Ida-Viru, Estonia View
Baltic Hunter-Gatherers individual, Estonia Neolithic Comb Ceramic Culture, Estonia 3646 BCE Kudruküla. Ida-Viru, Estonia View
Baltic Hunter-Gatherers individual, Estonia Neolithic Comb Ceramic Culture, Estonia 3785 BCE Kudruküla (Ida-Viru County, Narva-Jõesuu Municipality, Narva-Jõesuu Town), Estonia View
Baltic Hunter-Gatherers individual, Estonia Neolithic Comb Ceramic Culture, Estonia 3646 BCE Kudruküla (Ida-Viru County, Narva-Jõesuu Municipality, Narva-Jõesuu Town), Estonia View
Corded Ware individual, Estonia 2872 BCE Ardu. Harju, Estonia View
Corded Ware individual, Estonia 2872 BCE Ardu. Harju, Estonia View
Corded Ware individual, Estonia 2850 BCE Kursi. Jõgeva, Estonia View
Neolithic individual, Estonia 3646 BCE Kudruküla. Ida-Viru, Estonia View
Baltic Ln individual, Estonia 2575 BCE Kursi. Jõgeva, Estonia View
Page 1
Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
Neolithic individual, Estonia 3646 BCE Kudruküla. Ida-Viru, Estonia View
Neolithic individual, China 6690 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Page 1
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

Kudrukla3,0.11974216,0.04765464,0.0858165,0.07137502,0.01046876,0.01877204,-0.00382142,-0.00081592,-0.00564554,-0.03311338,0.00857616,-0.0089865,0.0158727,0.00225044,-0.00975966,-0.00964688,-0.0055949,-0.00356468,-0.00554082,-0.00723094,0.00024468,0.00180096,-0.01447002,0.00579544,-0.00298707
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 30% off • Expires Nov 16