Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of DA31
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Armenia in the Late Bronze Age era

DA31
1400 BCE - 1100 BCE
Male
Late Bronze Age Armenia
Armenia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

DA31

Date Range

1400 BCE - 1100 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

HV0a

Y-DNA Haplogroup

I-BY70891

Cultural Period

Late Bronze Age Armenia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Armenia
Locality Caucasus
Coordinates 40.5203, 44.9308
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

DA31 1400 BCE - 1100 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Late Bronze Age in Armenia, approximately spanning from 1600 to 1200 BCE, represents a significant period in the development of the region within the context of Ancient Near Eastern civilizations. This era is characterized by advances in metallurgy, trade, social organization, and culture, forming a critical bridge between the earlier cultural and technological advances of the Bronze Age and the subsequent developments in the Iron Age.

Geographical Context

Armenia during the Late Bronze Age was situated in the South Caucasus, a region characterized by its rugged terrain with mountains, valleys, and high plateaus. This geography influenced the settlement patterns, economic practices, and cultural developments of its inhabitants. The region's strategic location between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, and lying along the crossroads of trade routes connecting the Mesopotamian civilizations, the Anatolian plateau, and the Iranian plateau, made it a significant area for cultural and commercial exchange.

Cultural and Societal Aspects

Armenia during this period was not a politically unified state but rather a collection of small principalities and tribal entities. These groups were organized around family units or clans, and societal structure was likely hierarchical, with leaders or chieftains wielding significant authority.

Architecture and Settlement Patterns: Settlements from this era often consisted of fortresses and large, fortified complexes constructed on hilltops or strategically defensible locations. These sites served both as administrative centers and as protection against external threats or local conflicts. The architecture shows advanced techniques, including stone construction and complex defensive walls.

Trade and Economy: The Late Bronze Age marked an era of increased trade and interaction with neighboring regions. Armenia was known for its production and export of high-quality metal goods, particularly those made from copper, bronze, and later iron. The region’s natural resources, such as its rich deposits of metal ores, were significant in fostering a thriving metallurgical economy. Trade items likely included tools, weapons, jewelry, and possibly agricultural products like wine and grain.

Technological and Artistic Developments

Armenia's contributions to metallurgy during the Late Bronze Age are particularly noteworthy. The refinement of bronze-working techniques allowed for the production of intricate and durable tools and weapons. There was also a gradual transition towards iron production, setting the stage for the subsequent Iron Age developments.

Art and Craftsmanship: The era saw advances in pottery, with the production of well-fired ceramics featuring complex designs. Artefacts such as carved stone and metalwork reflect a high degree of craftsmanship and artistic expression. These items often illustrated symbols or motifs significant to the local belief systems, which might be tied to the natural world and the pantheon of deities worshipped at the time.

Religion and Beliefs

Religious practices in Late Bronze Age Armenia involved the worship of multiple deities, likely reflecting the region's Indo-European influences. Religious sites and artifacts, such as temple structures and votive offerings, provide evidence of complex spiritual activities. Rituals possibly included offerings or sacrifices intended to gain favor from the gods, particularly in agricultural contexts or before long journeys.

Interactions and Influences

Throughout the Late Bronze Age, Armenia was influenced by and interacted with neighboring powerful civilizations, such as the Hittites, Assyrians, and the Urartians, who were rising to prominence towards the end of this period. These interactions facilitated cultural exchanges, evident in shared architectural styles, linguistic borrowings, and the adoption of certain administrative systems.

Collapse and Transition

The end of the Late Bronze Age in Armenia, around 1200 BCE, was marked by a series of transformations that were part of a larger regional phenomenon often referred to as the Bronze Age Collapse. This transition was characterized by the decline of established societies and the movement of peoples, leading to significant changes in the political and social landscapes. This period set the stage for the emergence of new cultural and political entities, such as the Urartian Kingdom, which dominated the region in the subsequent Iron Age.

In summary, Late Bronze Age Armenia was a time of significant cultural development, increased trade and interaction with neighboring regions, and technological advancements that prefigured the transformations of the Iron Age. Despite the challenges of political fragmentation and eventual transitions, the era laid important foundations for the cultural identity and historical trajectory of the Armenian people.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of DA31 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Neolithic Farmers 50.8%
European Hunter-Gatherers 25.2%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 18.1%
Ancient Asians 5.9%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 91.6%
Northern West Asian 75.6%
Caucasian 48.6%
Mesopotamian 19.9%
Anatolian 6.3%
Cypriot 0.8%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 9.3%
Indian 6.6%
Pakistan 2.7%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 6.7%
Levantine 6.7%
Europe 7.2%
Northwestern European 7.2%
Northwestern European 5.5%
English 1.7%
America 1.2%
America 1.2%
Native American 1.2%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in Armenia in the Late Bronze Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Azerbaijani Dagestan
1.3788
2
Tat Azerbaijan
1.7264
3
Tat Dagestan Dzhalgan
1.9040
4
Kumyk
2.2526
5
Tat Dagestan Nyugdi
2.5802
6
Azerbaijani Republic Gabala
2.6367
7
Avar O
2.9372
8
Azerbaijani Republic Shaki
2.9953
9
Ingushian
3.1256
10
Karata
3.3268
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

137 ancient human genomes from across the Eurasian steppes

Authors Damgaard PB, Marchi N, Rasmussen S
Abstract

For thousands of years the Eurasian steppes have been a centre of human migrations and cultural change. Here we sequence the genomes of 137 ancient humans (about 1× average coverage), covering a period of 4,000 years, to understand the population history of the Eurasian steppes after the Bronze Age migrations. We find that the genetics of the Scythian groups that dominated the Eurasian steppes throughout the Iron Age were highly structured, with diverse origins comprising Late Bronze Age herders, European farmers and southern Siberian hunter-gatherers. Later, Scythians admixed with the eastern steppe nomads who formed the Xiongnu confederations, and moved westward in about the second or third century BC, forming the Hun traditions in the fourth-fifth century AD, and carrying with them plague that was basal to the Justinian plague. These nomads were further admixed with East Asian groups during several short-term khanates in the Medieval period. These historical events transformed the Eurasian steppes from being inhabited by Indo-European speakers of largely West Eurasian ancestry to the mostly Turkic-speaking groups of the present day, who are primarily of East Asian ancestry.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample DA31 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

DA31,0.09979948,0.10011432,-0.0403657,-0.01646942,-0.03673226,-0.00108504,0.00682522,-0.00613718,-0.04192488,-0.02465172,-0.00186444,0.0050366,-0.00814882,0.00016826,0.00970484,-9.614E-05,-0.00283618,-0.00136098,-0.0011983,0.00158294,0.0046952,0.00083216,0.00291516,0.0018413,0.00049417
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26