Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of AfontovaGora2
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Russia in the Late Upper Paleolithic era

AfontovaGora2
15001 BCE - 14640 BCE
Male
Afontova Gora 2 Site, Russia
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

AfontovaGora2

Date Range

15001 BCE - 14640 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

Not available

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Q-NGQ11

Cultural Period

Afontova Gora 2 Site, Russia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Afontova Gora
Coordinates 56.0160, 92.8660
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

AfontovaGora2 15001 BCE - 14640 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Afontova Gora 2 is one of the key archaeological sites providing insight into Upper Paleolithic cultures in Siberia, specifically from the late Upper Paleolithic period, around 20,000 to 10,000 years ago. Located near the city of Krasnoyarsk on the Yenisey River in Russia, Afontova Gora 2 is part of a broader complex of sites that have offered a wealth of information about the prehistoric peoples who inhabited this region during the Paleolithic era.

Geographical Context

The Afontova Gora complex is situated on a series of terraces on the left bank of the Yenisey River. The region is characterized by its harsh climate, with cold, snowy winters and relatively short, mild summers. During the late Upper Paleolithic, the climate would have been even more severe due to glacial conditions, making human habitation challenging. The site’s location along the Yenisey River likely provided strategic advantages, offering access to water, transportation routes, and a variety of ecological niches for hunting and gathering.

Archaeological Discoveries

Afontova Gora 2 has yielded a significant number of archaeological artifacts, giving considerable insight into the lifestyle, technology, and culture of its inhabitants. Artifacts discovered at the site include:

  • Stone Tools: A variety of lithic tools were found, including blades, scrapers, and projectile points. These tools suggest advanced methods of tool production and use typical of Upper Paleolithic technology. The presence of microblade technology is particularly noteworthy, indicating a sophisticated approach to tool making.

  • Bone and Antler Implements: The use of organic materials for tool production is evident in the bone and antler artifacts recovered, including needles and points, which suggest clothing production and detailed crafting skills.

  • Art and Ornamentation: Personal adornments such as beads and pendants made from bones and teeth have been uncovered, indicating a complex social structure with symbolic or aesthetic expressions. These items suggest that, beyond survival, aesthetic considerations and perhaps even social status played roles in this society.

  • Animal Remains: Faunal analysis shows remains primarily of large herbivores such as mammoths, bison, and reindeer, indicating that hunting was a significant part of the Afontova Gora 2 economy. The variety of species also implies seasonal hunting strategies and potentially sophisticated methods for processing and using animal products.

Cultural and Social Structure

The inhabitants of Afontova Gora 2 were likely highly adaptable, managing to survive in a demanding environment. Their toolkit suggests they were skilled hunters and gatherers with detailed knowledge of their environment. The societal structure of these groups may have been organized around extended family units or small bands that were semi-nomadic, moving seasonally to exploit different resources.

These groups likely had complex social organization, as indicated by the presence of trade networks suggested by the discovery of non-local materials. Additionally, the crafting of personal ornaments highlights the possible role of individual and group identity, indicating sophisticated cognitive and cultural development.

Significance

The significance of Afontova Gora 2 lies in its contribution to the understanding of Upper Paleolithic cultures in Siberia, a region that previously had been less understood compared to Western Europe. The site provides critical evidence for the migration and adaptation of human groups during the harsh climatic conditions of the late Ice Age and expands the knowledge of early human technological, social, and cultural evolution.

Conclusion

Afontova Gora 2 is a vital archaeological site for understanding the Upper Paleolithic cultures of Siberia. The richness of the artifacts found at this site provides valuable insights into the adaptive strategies, social structures, and cultural expressions of prehistoric humans in a challenging environment. Through continued research and excavation, Afontova Gora 2 continues to reveal the complexities of human life tens of thousands of years ago in Siberia.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

POPULATION GENETICS. Genomic evidence for the Pleistocene and recent population history of Native Americans

Authors Raghavan M, Steinrücken M, Harris K
Abstract

How and when the Americas were populated remains contentious. Using ancient and modern genome-wide data, we found that the ancestors of all present-day Native Americans, including Athabascans and Amerindians, entered the Americas as a single migration wave from Siberia no earlier than 23 thousand years ago (ka) and after no more than an 8000-year isolation period in Beringia. After their arrival to the Americas, ancestral Native Americans diversified into two basal genetic branches around 13 ka, one that is now dispersed across North and South America and the other restricted to North America. Subsequent gene flow resulted in some Native Americans sharing ancestry with present-day East Asians (including Siberians) and, more distantly, Australo-Melanesians. Putative "Paleoamerican" relict populations, including the historical Mexican Pericúes and South American Fuego-Patagonians, are not directly related to modern Australo-Melanesians as suggested by the Paleoamerican Model.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26