Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of ukr162
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Ukraine in the Neolithic era

ukr162
4784 BCE - 4552 BCE
Male
Yasinovatka Culture
Ukraine
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

ukr162

Date Range

4784 BCE - 4552 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

U4b1b1

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Cultural Period

Yasinovatka Culture

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Ukraine
Locality Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality)
Coordinates 48.1213, 35.0902
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

ukr162 4784 BCE - 4552 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Yasinovatka culture, a lesser-known yet distinct archaeological culture of Eastern Europe, emerged during a transformative era known as the Eneolithic period or the Copper Age, bridging the Neolithic and the Bronze Age. This period, roughly spanning from the late 4th to the early 3rd millennium BCE, was characterized by the gradual adoption of metalworking alongside established Neolithic practices. The Yasinovatka culture primarily flourished in the steppes and forest-steppe zones of present-day Ukraine and southwestern parts of Russia, particularly along the Dnieper River basin.

Geographic and Environmental Context

The Yasinovatka culture inhabited a region that provides a mix of steppe and forested areas, creating a unique ecological niche. These environments allowed for a balanced adaptation that included both agricultural and pastoral elements in their lifestyle. The river systems, especially the Dnieper, were crucial, offering routes for trade, communication, and resources like fish and water.

Societal Structure

The Yasinovatka community, like many of its contemporaries in the Eneolithic period, likely had a semi-sedentary lifestyle. Small to medium-sized settlements, often comprising pit-houses—semi-subterranean structures insulated against the harsh winters—were typical. The social structure was probably kin-based and egalitarian, with extended families living in close proximity. Evidence from burial practices suggests some level of social differentiation, though not as pronounced as in later Bronze Age cultures.

Economy and Subsistence

The subsistence economy of the Yasinovatka culture was mixed, combining hunting, gathering, agriculture, and animal husbandry. They cultivated crops like barley and wheat and domesticated animals such as cattle, sheep, and goats. Hunting supplemented their diet with wild game, including deer and wild boar.

Their strategic location along major river routes facilitated trade and interaction with neighboring cultures, allowing the exchange of goods, ideas, and technologies, including metalworking skills that started to influence their tool-making practices.

Technological and Artistic Developments

One of the defining features of the Yasinovatka culture was the nascent use of metallurgy, predominantly in the form of copper. Tools and ornaments from this period show a blend of stone and copper, symbolizing a transitional phase in technological evolution.

Pottery from this culture often featured decorations with cord impressions and geometric patterns, reflecting both utilitarian purposes and artistic expression. These ceramics, crucial for storage and cooking, offer significant insight into the everyday lives of the Yasinovatka people.

Spiritual and Burial Practices

The Yasinovatka culture had a rich spiritual life, as evidenced by their burial customs. Graves were often part of larger burial grounds or kurgans, which raised mounds of earth above them. Some burials included grave goods such as pottery, weapons, and ornaments made of bone, stone, or copper, indicating beliefs in an afterlife or reverence for ancestors.

The presence of anthropomorphic and zoomorphic figurines suggests a spiritual belief system that included the veneration of deities or spirits associated with nature and fertility. Ritual practices may have played a significant role in community cohesion and cultural continuity.

Cultural Interactions and Legacy

The Yasinovatka culture’s interactions with neighboring tribes and groups, such as the Tripolye–Cucuteni to the west and the later Pit–Comb Ware cultures to the north, were vital for cultural dissemination and technological advancement. These interactions enabled the exchange of ideas and commodities, through which the Yasinovatka people contributed to the broader narrative of prehistoric European cultures.

Over time, the influence of the Yasinovatka culture waned as populations migrated and environmental changes prompted cultural shifts, leading to the emergence of new cultural entities. However, their legacy persists in the archaeological record, offering a window into the formative processes that shaped early European societies.

Conclusion

The Yasinovatka culture represents a critical period in the prehistoric timeline of Eastern Europe, marked by innovation, adaptation, and cultural exchange. While not as extensively documented or monumental as some contemporaneous cultures, the Yasinovatka people contributed to the technological and social foundations that would eventually lead to more complex societal organizations in the Bronze Age. Their study aids in understanding the dynamics of cultural development and interaction on the prehistoric European landscape.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe

Authors Mattila TM, Svensson EM, Juras A
Abstract

The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27