Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I17363
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Hungary in the Middle Neolithic era

I17363
5305 BCE - 5064 BCE
Male
Middle Neolithic Hungary
Hungary
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I17363

Date Range

5305 BCE - 5064 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

V1a

Y-DNA Haplogroup

F

Cultural Period

Middle Neolithic Hungary

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Hungary
Locality Ebes-Zsong-volgy (Hajdú-Bihar County, Hajdúszoboszló)
Coordinates 47.4792, 21.5031
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I17363 5305 BCE - 5064 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Middle Neolithic period in Hungary, spanning from approximately 5000 to 4500 BCE, represents a fascinating era within the broader European Neolithic, characterized by significant cultural transformation and advancement. During this time, communities in the Carpathian Basin, which includes modern-day Hungary, experienced notable developments in agriculture, settlement patterns, social organization, and material culture, often influenced by interactions with neighboring regions.

Agricultural Practices

Agriculture played a crucial role in Middle Neolithic Hungary, as communities transitioned from a nomadic lifestyle to more settled farming practices. This era witnessed advancements in crop cultivation, with evidence of domesticated wheat, barley, and legumes like peas and lentils being grown. Additionally, animal husbandry became more standardized, with domesticated cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats forming the backbone of the agricultural economy. These practices allowed for a more reliable food supply and supported population growth and the development of larger, more permanent settlements.

Settlement Patterns

Settlements during the Middle Neolithic in Hungary became increasingly sophisticated, with villages typically consisting of clusters of longhouses, reflecting a shift toward more permanent habitation. These longhouses were rectangular, timber-framed structures with wattle-and-daub walls and thatched roofs, often organized in a linear arrangement. Such settlements were usually positioned near rivers and fertile plains, which provided essential resources such as water, arable land, and opportunities for fishing and hunting. The move toward settled village life facilitated the development of complex social structures and inter-community trade networks.

Social Organization

The Middle Neolithic era in Hungary saw a gradual increase in social stratification and complexity. Evidence of differentiated grave goods and burial practices suggests the emergence of social hierarchies. Some individuals were buried with pottery, tools, and ornaments, indicating status or wealth. This period also marks the beginning of more intricate communal activities, such as the construction of large communal buildings or enclosures, which likely played roles in religious or social gatherings, underscoring the increased integration and cooperation within communities.

Material Culture

One of the defining features of Middle Neolithic Hungary is the rich and diverse material culture, particularly pottery. This era is well-known for its highly decorated and finely crafted ceramics, including the Linear Pottery Culture (Linearbandkeramik or LBK) and the subsequent Lengyel culture. These ceramics featured intricate geometric patterns, often incised or painted, and were used in various domestic and ritual contexts. Tools and weapons made from flint, obsidian, and bone were prevalent, showcasing advancements in craftsmanship and the importance of inter-regional trade, as some raw materials were not locally sourced and had to be obtained through trade networks.

Interaction and Trade

The Carpathian Basin's strategic location facilitated interaction and exchange with neighboring regions, influencing Middle Neolithic Hungarian culture. Trade networks extended to the Balkans, Central Europe, and even as far as the Mediterranean, allowing for the exchange of goods, ideas, and technologies. This interaction is evidenced by the presence of non-local materials, such as Spondylus shells and imported stones and metals, in archaeological sites, indicating the integration of Hungary into a wider Neolithic exchange system.

Conclusion

The Middle Neolithic period in Hungary represents a dynamic era of cultural development characterized by agricultural advancements, evolving settlement patterns, complex social structures, and rich material culture. As part of the broader European Neolithic, this period exemplifies the transformative changes that laid the foundations for future societies in the region, driven by innovation, adaptation, and increased interconnectivity with neighboring cultures. Understanding this era provides crucial insights into the early formation of agricultural societies in Europe and the intricate web of cultural interactions that shaped human history in the region.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Social and genetic diversity in first farmers of central Europe

Authors Gelabert P, Bickle P, Hofmann D
Abstract

The Linearbandkeramik (LBK) Neolithic communities were the first to spread farming across large parts of Europe. We report genome-wide data for 250 individuals: 178 individuals from whole-cemetery surveys of the Alföld Linearbankeramik Culture eastern LBK site of Polgár-Ferenci-hát, the western LBK site of Nitra Horné Krškany and the western LBK settlement and massacre site of Asparn-Schletz, as well as 48 LBK individuals from 16 other sites and 24 earlier Körös and Starčevo individuals from 17 more sites. Here we show a systematically higher percentage of western hunter-gatherer ancestry in eastern than in western LBK sites, showing that these two distinct LBK groups had different genetic trajectories. We find evidence for patrilocality, with more structure across sites in the male than in the female lines and a higher rate of within-site relatives for males. At Asparn-Schletz we find almost no relatives, showing that the massacred individuals were from a large population, not a small community.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26