The genomic origins of the Bronze Age Tarim Basin mummies
Zhang F, Ning C, Scott A et al.
Publication Details
Comprehensive information about this research publication
Abstract
Summary of the research findings
The identity of the earliest inhabitants of Xinjiang, in the heart of Inner Asia, and the languages that they spoke have long been debated and remain contentious1. Here we present genomic data from 5 individuals dating to around 3000-2800 BC from the Dzungarian Basin and 13 individuals dating to around 2100-1700 BC from the Tarim Basin, representing the earliest yet discovered human remains from North and South Xinjiang, respectively. We find that the Early Bronze Age Dzungarian individuals exhibit a predominantly Afanasievo ancestry with an additional local contribution, and the Early-Middle Bronze Age Tarim individuals contain only a local ancestry. The Tarim individuals from the site of Xiaohe further exhibit strong evidence of milk proteins in their dental calculus, indicating a reliance on dairy pastoralism at the site since its founding. Our results do not support previous hypotheses for the origin of the Tarim mummies, who were argued to be Proto-Tocharian-speaking pastoralists descended from the Afanasievo1,2 or to have originated among the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex3 or Inner Asian Mountain Corridor cultures4. Instead, although Tocharian may have been plausibly introduced to the Dzungarian Basin by Afanasievo migrants during the Early Bronze Age, we find that the earliest Tarim Basin cultures appear to have arisen from a genetically isolated local population that adopted neighbouring pastoralist and agriculturalist practices, which allowed them to settle and thrive along the shifting riverine oases of the Taklamakan Desert.
Ancient DNA Samples
18 ancient DNA samples referenced in this publication
| Sample ID | Date/Era | Country | Locality | Sex | mtDNA | Y-DNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AYIM22BY | 2844 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Ayituohan | M | U5a1a1 |
Q1b1 |
| AYIM22BN | 2850 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Ayituohan | F | T2d1a |
|
| G218M5-2 | 2910 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Nileke | M | H15b1 |
R1b1a1a2a2 |
| G218M5-3N | 3008 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Nileke | M | U5a'b |
Q1b1 |
| GMGM1 | 2129 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Beifang | F | C4 |
|
| 11KBM1 | 1874 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Beifang | M | C4 |
R1 |
| L5209 | 2050 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Xiaohe | M | C4 |
R1b1c |
| L5213 | 2050 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Xiaohe | M | R1b1 |
R1b1c |
| L4964 | 2050 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Xiaohe | F | C4 |
|
| L6101 | 1767 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Xiaohe | F | C4 |
|
| L6103 | 1785 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Xiaohe | F | C4 |
|
| L6105 | 2050 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Xiaohe | F | C4 |
|
| L6106 | 2050 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Xiaohe | F | C4 |
|
| XHM100 | 1882 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Xiaohe | F | C4 |
|
| XHM110 | 2050 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Xiaohe | F | C4 |
|
| XHM135 | 1918 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Xiaohe | F | C4 |
|
| XHM75 | 2050 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Xiaohe | F | C4 |
|
| SSGM16 | 2864 BCE | China | Xinjiang. Songshugou | F | H2b |
|
Analysis
Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings
Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.