A man buried in China in the Mesolithic era

Download PDF creates a visual, rasterized copy. Use Print for selectable text and better assistive-technology support.

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Preparing the available report content...

Your report will open automatically.

Skip to main content
Reference library / Sample profile

A man buried in China in the Mesolithic era

Explore the recorded context, genetic comparisons and research behind this reference sample.

ChinaMesolithic China

A reference profile describes this sample. It does not establish a personal or family relationship.

AI portrait reconstruction for A man buried in China in the Mesolithic era
AI-generated artistic reconstruction, not a photograph of the individual.
Record

Sample details

Recorded details and available lineage markers.

Individual

East Asian individual, China

Sample ID: NE3

Date Range

8782 BCE - 8560 BCE

Cultural Period

Mesolithic China

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

Not available

Y-DNA Haplogroup

C

Social Role

Hunter (AI estimate, era-typical)

Geography

Location

Where this individual was discovered

Country China
Locality Amur River Basin
Chronology

Date range

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

East Asian individual, China 8782 BCE - 8560 BCE
Context

Historical context

Background information associated with the reference record.

Region & Environment

In Mesolithic China, people lived through a period of ecological transition as the late Pleistocene gave way to the Holocene. Across much of northern and northeastern China, landscapes shaped by cold-to-warmer climatic change created shifting resources in river systems, wetlands, and steppe-to-forest mosaics. Access to fish, game, and wild plant foods would have varied by locality and season.

Historical Context

This era predates widespread farming in most regions of China. Instead, communities remained largely foraging-based, with local technological responses to changing climates and animals. As environments stabilized, regional differences in subsistence strategies and toolkits would have become more visible in the archaeological record.

Populations & Lifeways

Populations were likely small and mobile, moving between seasonal resource zones. Lifeways commonly centered on hunting (including big and small game) and fishing, supplemented by gathering wild plants and other edible materials available in surrounding habitats. Social organization would have supported cooperation during hunting and processing of food, though the archaeological record rarely preserves direct evidence of group size or kinship.

Archaeology & Material Culture

Archaeological signatures for Mesolithic China typically emphasize stone tool traditions suited to cutting, scraping, and woodworking, along with evidence of fishing and processing activities where water resources were important. Sites are often found near waterways or landscapes with dependable seasonal resources. Organic materials such as wood and fiber are usually poorly preserved, so stone artifacts and site features (when present) provide the main evidence.

Culture & Society

Material culture reflects practical know-how rather than settled urban life. Repeated use of particular tool types suggests shared technical traditions within and between regions, while variation across sites can indicate local adaptations. Symbolic or ceremonial behavior may have existed, but for this deep prehistory such interpretations must be cautious and are generally limited to rare artifact contexts.

Legacy & Transition

The Mesolithic phase set the stage for later Neolithic developments by demonstrating long-term human occupation of diverse ecologies and flexible subsistence strategies. As Holocene conditions continued and resource systems changed, some regions eventually supported more intensive exploitation and, later, the emergence of farming lifeways in succeeding periods.

Analysis

Genetic comparisons

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing statistical similarity to modern reference populations from different regions. The excavation site records where this individual was found, not a fixed modern genetic identity.

Asia 98.8%
Northern Asian 49.1%
Mongolian 28.7%
Siberian 20.4%
Japanese & Korean 43.2%
Japanese 43.2%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 5.0%
Chinese 5.0%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 1.6%
Central Asian 1.6%
Africa 1.2%
African Hunter-Gatherer 0.8%
African Hunter-Gatherer 0.8%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in China in the Mesolithic era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity. Cross-region similarity can reflect shared ancestry, population movement, continuity, or later admixture.

1
Oroqen
2.1545
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
Amur River Basin Mesolithic individual, China Mesolithic China 9243 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China Early Neolithic China 8175 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China Early Neolithic China 7172 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China Neolithic China 5471 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Bronze Age China 1510 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Neolithic individual, China Early Neolithic China 7458 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Neolithic individual, China Early Neolithic China 7456 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 17605 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 12896 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 12371 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 10774 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8782 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8740 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 9442 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8810 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4448 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4999 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 6375 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4445 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 6690 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 6465 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4990 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Paleolithic China 32159 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Palaeolithic individual, China 32159 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Hg individual, China 17605 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Hg individual, China 12896 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Late Paleolithic individual, China 12371 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Late Paleolithic individual, China 10774 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Mesolithic individual, China 9442 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 8810 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Mesolithic individual, China 8782 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Mesolithic individual, China 8740 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 7458 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 7456 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Neolithic individual, China 6690 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 6465 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 6375 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Mn individual, China 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Mn individual, China 4999 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Ba individual, China 1510 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin Late Paleolithic individual, China 10812 BCE Zhaodong on the northern bank of the Songhua River (Amur River Basin, southwest Heilongjiang Province, Songnen Plain), China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China 4457 BCE Zhaodong on the northern bank of the Songhua River (Amur River Basin, southwest Heilongjiang Province, Songnen Plain), China View
Amur River Basin Late Paleolithic individual, China 12462 BCE Zhaodong on the northern bank of the Songhua River (Amur River Basin, southwest Heilongjiang Province, Songnen Plain), China View
Page 1
Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
Amur River Basin Mesolithic individual, China Mesolithic China 9243 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8782 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8740 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 9442 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8810 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Page 1
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

NE3,0.02885594,-0.43696526,0.0721692,-0.0397376,-0.04894246,-0.03359198,0.00970964,0.01186838,0.0067321,0.0119861,-0.01993358,-0.00157632,0.00380594,0.00093786,-0.01191026,-0.00773,-0.00512656,0.00584336,0.01498474,0.00890014,0.01753724,-0.01792638,-0.0018314,0.00336758,0.00759572
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 30% off • Expires Nov 16