A man buried in China in the era

Download PDF creates a visual, rasterized copy. Use Print for selectable text and better assistive-technology support.

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Preparing the available report content...

Your report will open automatically.

Skip to main content
Reference library / Sample profile

A man buried in China in the era

Explore the recorded context, genetic comparisons and research behind this reference sample.

ChinaThe Mesolithic Period

A reference profile describes this sample. It does not establish a personal or family relationship.

AI portrait reconstruction for A man buried in China in the  era
AI-generated artistic reconstruction, not a photograph of the individual.
Record

Sample details

Recorded details and available lineage markers.

Individual

Mesolithic individual, China

Sample ID: NE8

Date Range

9442 BCE - 9248 BCE

Cultural Period

The Mesolithic Period

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

Not available

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Social Role

Hunter (AI estimate, era-typical)

Geography

Location

Where this individual was discovered

Country China
Locality Amur River Basin
Chronology

Date range

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

Mesolithic individual, China 9442 BCE - 9248 BCE
Context

Historical context

Background information associated with the reference record.

Region & Environment

The Mesolithic period is defined by regional hunter-gatherer societies living after the peak of the last glaciation and during early to middle Holocene conditions. Climate change affected vegetation, water availability, and animal distributions, producing shifting resource landscapes across forests, wetlands, and coastal zones.

Historical Context

Rather than a single timeline, the Mesolithic is a periodization used across different regions where farming had not yet become the dominant economic strategy. The transition to more stable climates created new ecological opportunities, while community adaptation patterns differed by geography—coastal groups focused on marine resources, and inland groups used forest and open-ground resources.

Populations & Lifeways

Mesolithic populations were typically mobile or semi-mobile, organizing seasonal movement to exploit year-round resources. Lifeways commonly included hunting and fishing, gathering wild plant foods, and making specialized stone tools suited to local materials and prey. Social organization likely emphasized cooperation in small groups, with knowledge of landscapes passed through tradition.

Archaeology & Material Culture

Archaeological signatures usually include lithic technology—such as prepared stone tool industries—and evidence of butchering and woodworking. Many sites are temporary or short-lived, so preservation can be uneven, but repeated use of landscapes can be inferred from repeated tool-making activities and patterned scatters of artifacts. Organic materials may survive in waterlogged contexts, providing additional evidence for fishing gear and wooden tools, where conditions allow.

Culture & Society

Material culture reflects practical solutions: tool types and production strategies suited to different raw materials and tasks. Variability between regions suggests local traditions and adaptations rather than a single cultural system. Social meaning is harder to reconstruct directly, but burial practices (where known) and the repeated use of specific places can indicate shared customs and landscape familiarity.

Legacy & Transition

The Mesolithic transition leads into Neolithic developments in many regions, where domestication and farming gradually spread. The Mesolithic legacy lies in the ecological knowledge and technological flexibility of hunter-gatherers, which often shaped how communities responded to new opportunities and constraints during the transition to agricultural economies.

Analysis

Genetic comparisons

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing statistical similarity to modern reference populations from different regions. The excavation site records where this individual was found, not a fixed modern genetic identity.

Asia 98.0%
Northern Asian 50.8%
Mongolian 27.5%
Siberian 23.4%
Japanese & Korean 47.2%
Japanese 47.2%
Oceania 0.9%
Melanesian 0.9%
Papuan 0.9%
America 0.6%
America 0.6%
Native American 0.6%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in China in the era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity. Cross-region similarity can reflect shared ancestry, population movement, continuity, or later admixture.

1
Oroqen
2.4695
2
Ulchi
3.5373
3
Nanai
3.5964
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
Amur River Basin Mesolithic individual, China Mesolithic China 9243 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China Early Neolithic China 8175 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China Early Neolithic China 7172 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China Neolithic China 5471 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Bronze Age China 1510 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Neolithic individual, China Early Neolithic China 7458 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Neolithic individual, China Early Neolithic China 7456 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 17605 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 12896 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 12371 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 10774 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8782 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8740 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 9442 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8810 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4448 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4999 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 6375 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4445 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 6690 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 6465 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4990 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Paleolithic China 32159 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Palaeolithic individual, China 32159 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Hg individual, China 17605 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Hg individual, China 12896 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Late Paleolithic individual, China 12371 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Late Paleolithic individual, China 10774 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Mesolithic individual, China 9442 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 8810 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Mesolithic individual, China 8782 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Mesolithic individual, China 8740 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 7458 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 7456 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Neolithic individual, China 6690 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 6465 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 6375 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Mn individual, China 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Mn individual, China 4999 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Ba individual, China 1510 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin Late Paleolithic individual, China 10812 BCE Zhaodong on the northern bank of the Songhua River (Amur River Basin, southwest Heilongjiang Province, Songnen Plain), China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China 4457 BCE Zhaodong on the northern bank of the Songhua River (Amur River Basin, southwest Heilongjiang Province, Songnen Plain), China View
Amur River Basin Late Paleolithic individual, China 12462 BCE Zhaodong on the northern bank of the Songhua River (Amur River Basin, southwest Heilongjiang Province, Songnen Plain), China View
Page 1
Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
Mesolithic individual, Russia 6570 BCE Siberian Federal District. Trans-Baikal. Buryatia. Dzhylinda site, Russia View
Mesolithic individual, China 9442 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Mesolithic individual, China 8782 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Mesolithic individual, China 8740 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Page 1
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

NE8,0.02834382,-0.4356576,0.0749141,-0.0350281,-0.05336834,-0.04107822,0.01086646,0.01426028,0.0064565,0.01322002,-0.01554876,-0.00062422,0.00301412,0.00132396,-0.01199044,-0.0091257,-0.00577692,0.00667036,0.01565836,0.00935284,0.01828976,-0.01933982,-0.00158356,0.00328516,0.00851202
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 30% off • Expires Nov 16