A woman buried in China in the Pleistocene era

Download PDF creates a visual, rasterized copy. Use Print for selectable text and better assistive-technology support.

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Preparing the available report content...

Your report will open automatically.

Skip to main content
Reference library / Sample profile

A woman buried in China in the Pleistocene era

Explore the recorded context, genetic comparisons and research behind this reference sample.

ChinaPaleolithic China

A reference profile describes this sample. It does not establish a personal or family relationship.

AI portrait reconstruction for A woman buried in China in the Pleistocene era
AI-generated artistic reconstruction, not a photograph of the individual.
Record

Sample details

Recorded details and available lineage markers.

Individual

East Asian Paleolithic individual, China

Sample ID: NE20

Date Range

32159 BCE - 31169 BCE

Cultural Period

Paleolithic China

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

B4'5

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Social Role

Gatherer (AI estimate, era-typical)

Geography

Location

Where this individual was discovered

Country China
Locality Amur River Basin
Chronology

Date range

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

East Asian Paleolithic individual, China 32159 BCE - 31169 BCE
Context

Historical context

Background information associated with the reference record.

Region & Environment

Across Paleolithic China, environments were strongly shaped by Pleistocene climate fluctuations. Glacial and interglacial periods altered temperature, rainfall, and vegetation, affecting the distribution of animals and the availability of raw materials such as stone. Over long timespans, human populations would have shifted or reoriented activities in response to these changing ecological conditions.

Historical Context

This era encompasses deep prehistory, including multiple phases of human occupation before the emergence of historically recognizable cultures. The archaeological record documents long-term continuity and change in stone-working traditions, as well as episodic expansions and contractions of populations tied to environmental opportunity and constraint. Because the period is so broad, interpretations often rely on general patterns rather than detailed narratives for every interval.

Populations & Lifeways

Paleolithic lifeways were primarily those of foraging groups, with mobility varying according to seasonality and local resource availability. Hunting large and small animals, processing carcasses, and making and maintaining tools would have been central activities. Crafting and using stone implements for cutting, scraping, and woodworking supported daily tasks such as food preparation and the maintenance of hunting-related technologies.

Archaeology & Material Culture

Stone artifacts are the dominant evidence for Paleolithic China and include a range of flaking and shaping methods adapted to specific tasks. Tool types and production techniques vary by time, region, and the raw materials available. Archaeological sites may preserve activity areas associated with toolmaking and food processing, though organic materials and perishable technologies are usually poorly represented in most contexts.

Culture & Society

In deep prehistory, “culture” is largely observed through recurring technological choices and patterns of tool production. Such patterns imply learned traditions transmitted within groups and across generations. Variation in assemblages suggests adaptation to local resources and different planning horizons—e.g., short stays for immediate procurement versus longer-term use of favorable sites.

Legacy & Transition

The Paleolithic period established long-standing human presence across varied Chinese landscapes and developed technological repertoires for survival through climate volatility. The ending phase (approaching 10,000 BCE) corresponds to broader environmental stabilization, setting conditions in which Mesolithic and then Neolithic lifeways could take shape in later periods.

Analysis

Genetic comparisons

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing statistical similarity to modern reference populations from different regions. The excavation site records where this individual was found, not a fixed modern genetic identity.

Asia 83.0%
Northern Asian 37.0%
Mongolian 37.0%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 31.9%
Indian 31.9%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 14.2%
Indonesian Khmer Thai Myanma 14.2%
Oceania 9.8%
Melanesian 9.8%
Papuan 9.8%
Africa 7.2%
African Hunter-Gatherer 7.2%
African Hunter-Gatherer 7.2%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in China in the Pleistocene era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity. Cross-region similarity can reflect shared ancestry, population movement, continuity, or later admixture.

1
Nepali Indo Aryan O1
9.0560
2
Tharu
9.8213
3
Brahmin Manipuri
9.8537
4
Newar
9.8770
5
Kusunda
10.0203
6
Nyishi
10.0285
7
Nepali Indo Aryan O2
11.4486
8
Onge
12.0797
9
Tharu O2
12.0950
10
Jarawa
12.2548
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
Amur River Basin Mesolithic individual, China Mesolithic China 9243 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China Early Neolithic China 8175 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China Early Neolithic China 7172 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China Neolithic China 5471 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Bronze Age China 1510 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Neolithic individual, China Early Neolithic China 7458 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Neolithic individual, China Early Neolithic China 7456 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 17605 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 12896 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 12371 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Late Paleolithic China 10774 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8782 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8740 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 9442 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian individual, China Mesolithic China 8810 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4448 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4999 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 6375 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4445 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 6690 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 6465 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 4990 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, China Neolithic China 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Paleolithic China 32159 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Palaeolithic individual, China 32159 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Hg individual, China 17605 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Hg individual, China 12896 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Late Paleolithic individual, China 12371 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Late Paleolithic individual, China 10774 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Mesolithic individual, China 9442 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 8810 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Mesolithic individual, China 8782 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Mesolithic individual, China 8740 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 7458 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 7456 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Neolithic individual, China 6690 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 6465 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East En individual, China 6375 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Mn individual, China 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Mn individual, China 4999 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Asia East Ba individual, China 1510 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Amur River Basin Late Paleolithic individual, China 10812 BCE Zhaodong on the northern bank of the Songhua River (Amur River Basin, southwest Heilongjiang Province, Songnen Plain), China View
Amur River Basin N individual, China 4457 BCE Zhaodong on the northern bank of the Songhua River (Amur River Basin, southwest Heilongjiang Province, Songnen Plain), China View
Amur River Basin Late Paleolithic individual, China 12462 BCE Zhaodong on the northern bank of the Songhua River (Amur River Basin, southwest Heilongjiang Province, Songnen Plain), China View
Page 1
Individual Culture/Period Date Location Action
East Asian Paleolithic individual, China Paleolithic China 32159 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Page 1
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

NE20,-0.03108404,-0.2575236,-0.06891718,0.0500104,-0.00757148,-0.0267421,0.00463934,0.0070492,0.02361262,0.00985226,-0.03548008,0.00027502,0.00253008,0.0013622,-0.00686276,-0.00783224,0.00502516,-0.00167862,0.00157212,-0.00042508,0.00304508,0.00824816,0.00263394,0.0040951,0.01377284
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 30% off • Expires Nov 16