Menu
GWAS Study

Large-scale genome-wide association analysis of bipolar disorder identifies a new susceptibility locus near ODZ4.

Sklar P

21926972 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
63649 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

SP
Sklar P
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

We conducted a combined genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 7,481 individuals with bipolar disorder (cases) and 9,250 controls as part of the Psychiatric GWAS Consortium. Our replication study tested 34 SNPs in 4,496 independent cases with bipolar disorder and 42,422 independent controls and found that 18 of 34 SNPs had P < 0.05, with 31 of 34 SNPs having signals with the same direction of effect (P = 3.8 × 10(-7)). An analysis of all 11,974 bipolar disorder cases and 51,792 controls confirmed genome-wide significant evidence of association for CACNA1C and identified a new intronic variant in ODZ4. We identified a pathway comprised of subunits of calcium channels enriched in bipolar disorder association intervals. Finally, a combined GWAS analysis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder yielded strong association evidence for SNPs in CACNA1C and in the region of NEK4-ITIH1-ITIH3-ITIH4. Our replication results imply that increasing sample sizes in bipolar disorder will confirm many additional loci.

7,481 European ancestry cases, 9,250 European ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

63649
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
4,496 European ancestry cases, 42,422 European ancestry controls
Replication Participants
European
Ancestry
U.S., Canada, Germany, U.K., Norway, Sweden, Australia, Iceland, France
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.