Menu
GWAS Study

Genome-wide meta-analysis of myopia and hyperopia provides evidence for replication of 11 loci.

Simpson CL, Wojciechowski R, Oexle K et al.

25233373 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
20933 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

SC
Simpson CL
WR
Wojciechowski R
OK
Oexle K
MF
Murgia F
PL
Portas L
LX
Li X
VV
Verhoeven VJ
VV
Vitart V
SM
Schache M
HS
Hosseini SM
HP
Hysi PG
RL
Raffel LJ
CM
Cotch MF
CE
Chew E
KB
Klein BE
KR
Klein R
WT
Wong TY
VD
van Duijn CM
MP
Mitchell P
SS
Saw SM
FM
Fossarello M
WJ
Wang JJ
PO
Polašek O
CH
Campbell H
RI
Rudan I
OB
Oostra BA
UA
Uitterlinden AG
HA
Hofman A
RF
Rivadeneira F
AN
Amin N
KL
Karssen LC
VJ
Vingerling JR
DA
Döring A
BT
Bettecken T
BG
Bencic G
GC
Gieger C
WH
Wichmann HE
WJ
Wilson JF
VC
Venturini C
FB
Fleck B
CP
Cumberland PM
RJ
Rahi JS
HC
Hammond CJ
HC
Hayward C
WA
Wright AF
PA
Paterson AD
BP
Baird PN
KC
Klaver CC
RJ
Rotter JI
PM
Pirastu M
MT
Meitinger T
BJ
Bailey-Wilson JE
SD
Stambolian D
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Refractive error (RE) is a complex, multifactorial disorder characterized by a mismatch between the optical power of the eye and its axial length that causes object images to be focused off the retina. The two major subtypes of RE are myopia (nearsightedness) and hyperopia (farsightedness), which represent opposite ends of the distribution of the quantitative measure of spherical refraction. We performed a fixed effects meta-analysis of genome-wide association results of myopia and hyperopia from 9 studies of European-derived populations: AREDS, KORA, FES, OGP-Talana, MESA, RSI, RSII, RSIII and ERF. One genome-wide significant region was observed for myopia, corresponding to a previously identified myopia locus on 8q12 (p = 1.25×10(-8)), which has been reported by Kiefer et al. as significantly associated with myopia age at onset and Verhoeven et al. as significantly associated to mean spherical-equivalent (MSE) refractive error. We observed two genome-wide significant associations with hyperopia. These regions overlapped with loci on 15q14 (minimum p value = 9.11×10(-11)) and 8q12 (minimum p value 1.82×10(-11)) previously reported for MSE and myopia age at onset. We also used an intermarker linkage- disequilibrium-based method for calculating the effective number of tests in targeted regional replication analyses. We analyzed myopia (which represents the closest phenotype in our data to the one used by Kiefer et al.) and showed replication of 10 additional loci associated with myopia previously reported by Kiefer et al. This is the first replication of these loci using myopia as the trait under analysis. "Replication-level" association was also seen between hyperopia and 12 of Kiefer et al.'s published loci. For the loci that show evidence of association to both myopia and hyperopia, the estimated effect of the risk alleles were in opposite directions for the two traits. This suggests that these loci are important contributors to variation of refractive error across the distribution.

7,068 European ancestry cases, 6,844 European ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

20933
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
1,554 European ancestry cases, 892 cases, 1,654 European ancestry controls, 2,921 controls
Replication Participants
European
Ancestry
Italy, Germany, Australia, U.K., Croatia, U.S., Canada
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.