Menu
GWAS Study

Heritability and molecular genetic basis of antisaccade eye tracking error rate: a genome-wide association study.

Vaidyanathan U, Malone SM, Donnelly JM et al.

25387707 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
4469 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

VU
Vaidyanathan U
MS
Malone SM
DJ
Donnelly JM
HM
Hammer MA
MM
Miller MB
MM
McGue M
IW
Iacono WG
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Antisaccade deficits reflect abnormalities in executive function linked to various disorders including schizophrenia, externalizing psychopathology, and neurological conditions. We examined the genetic bases of antisaccade error in a sample of community-based twins and parents (N = 4,469). Biometric models showed that about half of the variance in the antisaccade response was due to genetic factors and half due to nonshared environmental factors. Molecular genetic analyses supported these results, showing that the heritability accounted for by common molecular genetic variants approximated biometric estimates. Genome-wide analyses revealed several SNPs as well as two genes-B3GNT7 and NCL-on Chromosome 2 associated with antisaccade error. SNPs and genes hypothesized to be associated with antisaccade error based on prior work, although generating some suggestive findings for MIR137, GRM8, and CACNG2, could not be confirmed.

4,469 European ancestry twins and their parents

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

4469
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
U.S.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.